27 Jul
2006
27 Jul
'06
1:21 a.m.
Hi,
I am trying to implement Third-Party registration in
IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF. Here is what
I want to do:
UAC
.....................................................................................S-CSCF
(Openser)
REGISTER
----------------------------------->
200 OK
<--------------------------------------
This part is working fine.
Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to Application
Server (AS) and needs to get the response. But, this
response should NOT be sent to UAC.
S-CSCF
...........................................................................
AS
REGISTER
------------------------------------->
Response
([1-6]xx
<-----------------------------------------
I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old headers
from the first REGISTER received from UAC and
creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf). Also,
I just removed the old "via" header, and Openser
automatically added new Via header with openser ip
address.
However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF forwards
this response to UAC even though Via header does NOT
contain the UAC IP address. Why is that? How to
stop relaying the any response received from AS to
UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new REGISTER
request from OpenSER?
Thanks,
Vivek
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
27 Jul
27 Jul
8:56 a.m.
What about t_replicate?
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
Behalf Of Vivek Bhat
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:22 AM
To: users(a)openser.org
Subject: [Users] Query on Registration
Hi,
I am trying to implement Third-Party registration in
IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF. Here is what
I want to do:
UAC
........................................................................
..
...........S-CSCF
(Openser)
REGISTER
----------------------------------->
200 OK
<--------------------------------------
This part is working fine.
Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to Application
Server (AS) and needs to get the response. But, this
response should NOT be sent to UAC.
S-CSCF
........................................................................
..
.
AS
REGISTER
------------------------------------->
Response
([1-6]xx
<-----------------------------------------
I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old headers
from the first REGISTER received from UAC and
creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf). Also,
I just removed the old "via" header, and Openser
automatically added new Via header with openser ip
address.
However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF forwards
this response to UAC even though Via header does NOT
contain the UAC IP address. Why is that? How to
stop relaying the any response received from AS to
UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new REGISTER
request from OpenSER?
Thanks,
Vivek
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
9:40 a.m.
You can also try to do it outside the config, using the UNIX/FIFO
interface and the t_uac "function".
just my 2 cents..
SAmuel.
2006/7/27, Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com <Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com>om>:
What about t_replicate?
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
Behalf Of Vivek Bhat
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:22 AM
To: users(a)openser.org
Subject: [Users] Query on Registration
Hi,
I am trying to implement Third-Party registration in
IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF. Here is what
I want to do:
UAC
........................................................................
..
...........S-CSCF
(Openser)
REGISTER
----------------------------------->
200 OK
<--------------------------------------
This part is working fine.
Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to Application
Server (AS) and needs to get the response. But, this
response should NOT be sent to UAC.
S-CSCF
........................................................................
..
.
AS
REGISTER
------------------------------------->
Response
([1-6]xx
<-----------------------------------------
I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old headers
from the first REGISTER received from UAC and
creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf). Also,
I just removed the old "via" header, and Openser
automatically added new Via header with openser ip
address.
However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF forwards
this response to UAC even though Via header does NOT
contain the UAC IP address. Why is that? How to
stop relaying the any response received from AS to
UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new REGISTER
request from OpenSER?
Thanks,
Vivek
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
8:42 p.m.
Thanks Ohad, Samuel. t_replicate worked fine.
However, I faced one another problem.
If the Via header from UAC contains "rport" parameter,
then, removing Via header before calling t_replicate()
still adds the rport parameter with the value in the
newly added Via from Openser. Also, it doesn't add
"\r\n" to the new Via header, thereby, the next header
field concatanates with the Via header as below:
Here is the REGISTER received from openser using
t_replicate() function:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received from 172.16.13.100:5061 (UDP) the following
SIP message
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
REGISTER sip:172..16.13.91:5070 SIP/2.0^M
To: Binh<sip:4082221001@172..16.13.91>^M
From: SER_4082221001
<sip:4082221001@172.16.13.100:5061>;tag=1153994489
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.16.13.100:5061;branch=z9hG4bK7be.87b21eb4.0^M
;rport=6527Contact:
<sip:4082221001@172.16.13.100:5061>^M
Expires: 3600^M
Max-Forwards: 69^M
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER,
NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO^M
User-Agent: Open SER User Agent
Content-Length: 0^M
CSeq: 1000 REGISTER^M
Call-ID: 1153994489^M
^M
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
--------------------------------------
Note that Original "Via" is removed using remove_hf()
function before calling t_replicate. But, still
"rport" parameter is appended to the new "Via" header.
Also, the next header "Contact" is concatanated with
Via.
Please advice how to avoid "rport" being appended?
Thanks,
Vivek
--- samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com> wrote:
........................................................................
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
You can also try to do it outside the config, using
the UNIX/FIFO
interface and the t_uac "function".
just my 2 cents..
SAmuel.
2006/7/27, Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com
<Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com>om>:
........................................................................
What about t_replicate?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces(a)openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
> Behalf Of Vivek Bhat
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:22 AM
> To: users(a)openser.org
> Subject: [Users] Query on Registration
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement Third-Party
registration in
> IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF.
Here is
what
I want to
do:
UAC
..
> ...........S-CSCF
> (Openser)
>
> REGISTER
>
> ----------------------------------->
>
> 200 OK
>
> <--------------------------------------
>
> This part is working fine.
>
> Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to
Application
> Server (AS) and needs to get the response.
But,
this
response
should NOT be sent to UAC.
S-CSCF
..
> .
> AS
>
> REGISTER
>
> ------------------------------------->
>
> Response
> ([1-6]xx
>
> <-----------------------------------------
>
> I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old
headers
> from the first REGISTER received from UAC
and
> creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf).
Also,
> I just removed the old "via"
header, and Openser
> automatically added new Via header with openser
ip
> address.
>
> However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF
forwards
> this response to UAC even though Via header
does
NOT
> contain the UAC IP address. Why is that?
How
to
> stop relaying the any response received
from
AS to
> UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new
REGISTER
> request from OpenSER?
>
> Thanks,
> Vivek
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
>
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
28 Jul
28 Jul
11:40 a.m.
Hello,
I do not think it is needed to remove the Via header for replication of
REGISTER. Is there a special purpose for it?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 07/27/06 21:42, Vivek Bhat wrote:
Thanks Ohad, Samuel. t_replicate worked fine.
However, I faced one another problem.
If the Via header from UAC contains "rport" parameter,
then, removing Via header before calling t_replicate()
still adds the rport parameter with the value in the
newly added Via from Openser. Also, it doesn't add
"\r\n" to the new Via header, thereby, the next header
field concatanates with the Via header as below:
Here is the REGISTER received from openser using
t_replicate() function:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received from 172.16.13.100:5061 (UDP) the following
SIP message
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
REGISTER sip:172..16.13.91:5070 SIP/2.0^M
To: Binh<sip:4082221001@172..16.13.91>^M
From: SER_4082221001
<sip:4082221001@172.16.13.100:5061>;tag=1153994489
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.16.13.100:5061;branch=z9hG4bK7be.87b21eb4.0^M
;rport=6527Contact:
<sip:4082221001@172.16.13.100:5061>^M
Expires: 3600^M
Max-Forwards: 69^M
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER,
NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO^M
User-Agent: Open SER User Agent
Content-Length: 0^M
CSeq: 1000 REGISTER^M
Call-ID: 1153994489^M
^M
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
--------------------------------------
Note that Original "Via" is removed using remove_hf()
function before calling t_replicate. But, still
"rport" parameter is appended to the new "Via" header.
Also, the next header "Contact" is concatanated with
Via.
Please advice how to avoid "rport" being appended?
Thanks,
Vivek
--- samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com> wrote:
........................................................................
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
You can also try to do it outside the config,
using
the UNIX/FIFO
interface and the t_uac "function".
just my 2 cents..
SAmuel.
2006/7/27, Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com
<Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com>om>:
........................................................................
What about t_replicate?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces(a)openser.org
>
[mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
> Behalf Of Vivek Bhat
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:22 AM
> To: users(a)openser.org
> Subject: [Users] Query on Registration
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement Third-Party
>
registration in
> IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF. Here
is
>
what
>> I want to do:
>>
>> UAC
>>
>> ..
> ...........S-CSCF
> (Openser)
>
> REGISTER
>
> ----------------------------------->
>
> 200 OK
>
> <--------------------------------------
>
> This part is working fine.
>
> Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to
>
Application
> Server (AS) and needs to get the response.
But,
>
this
>> response should NOT be sent to UAC.
>>
>> S-CSCF
>>
>> ..
> .
> AS
>
> REGISTER
>
> ------------------------------------->
>
> Response
> ([1-6]xx
>
> <-----------------------------------------
>
> I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old
>
headers
> from the first REGISTER received from UAC
and
> creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf).
>
Also,
> I just removed the old "via"
header, and Openser
> automatically added new Via header with openser
>
ip
> address.
>
> However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF
>
forwards
> this response to UAC even though Via header
does
>
NOT
> contain the UAC IP address. Why is that?
How
>
to
> stop relaying the any response received
from
>
AS to
> UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new
>
REGISTER
> request from OpenSER?
>
> Thanks,
> Vivek
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>
protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
>
>
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
6502
days inactive
6504
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Ohad.Levy＠infineon.com -
samuel -
Vivek Bhat