Hi Juha,
Thanks for the reply. I undertsand now. However if I want to implement sequential forking i.e. by adding a failure route etc, won't this do sequential forking for every user?....Is there a way of making this user profile specific?
Many Thanks, Aisling.
---- Original Message ---- From: jh@tutpro.com To: ashling.odriscoll@cit.ie Subject: RE: [Serusers] Parallel Forking Query Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:37:42 +0300
Aisling O'Driscoll writes:
I want to set up SER such that some users have their imcoming
calls
forked to all their devices and others have their incoming calls processed as normal....Is this possible??
if a user has several contacts registered for an aor with the same q value, then it is "normal" for a proxy to parallel fork to all those contacts.
-- juha
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
Aisling O'Driscoll writes:
Thanks for the reply. I undertsand now. However if I want to implement sequential forking i.e. by adding a failure route etc, won't this do sequential forking for every user?....Is there a way of making this user profile specific?
again, all depends on the q values. it would be a way to big hack to start forking sequentially equal q values for some users.
-- juha