21 Jan
2009
21 Jan
'09
9 p.m.
Hi All
I was finally able to setup carrierroute on Solaris :). I am using
carrierroute in db mode and I did setup two entries with rewritehost in
carrierroute and two entries in route_tree with one route being default.
I am still very new to carrierroute as a sample start I do have two
astersisk servers that will act as pstn_gw and I want to split the
traffic in half between both servers.
Can anyone please provide sample instructions on what to put into the
route{} statement in this scenario and any main ideas about route_tree
and carrierroute ?
Thanks.
22 Jan
22 Jan
4:34 p.m.
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
I was finally able to setup carrierroute on Solaris
:). I am using
carrierroute in db mode and I did setup two entries with rewritehost in
carrierroute and two entries in route_tree with one route being default.
I am still very new to carrierroute as a sample start I do have two
astersisk servers that will act as pstn_gw and I want to split the
traffic in half between both servers.
Can anyone please provide sample instructions on what to put into the
route{} statement in this scenario and any main ideas about route_tree
and carrierroute ?
Hi Ali,
a simple configuration example can be found in the docs, "Example 1.17.
Configuration example - Routing to default tree". Example database content
can be found as well, its also explained there. If you set the server
loglevel to INFO, cr will give many informations about the routing rules it
loaded, and also the routing process.
Cheers,
Henning
23 Jan
23 Jan
1:42 p.m.
Hi All
I did try out that example 1.44.
I am getting this error:
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:pv_parse_spec: bad parameters
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] INFO:carrierroute:carrier_fixup: carrier tree
default has id 3
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:pv_parse_spec: bad parameters
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:pv_parse_spec: bad parameters
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:carrierroute:avp_name_fixup: Malformed or
non AVP definition <crc32>
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:carrierroute:route_fixup: cannot fixup
parameter 6
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:fix_actions: fixing failed (code=-1)
at cfg line 445
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] CRITICAL:core:fix_expr: fix_actions error
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:main: failed to fix configuration
with err code -1
Using this script:
if(!cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id", "crc32")){
sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
} else {
# In case of failure, re-route the request
t_on_failure("1");
# Relay the request to the gateway
t_relay();
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de]
Sent: 2009-01-22 13:35
To: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Cc: Ali Jawad
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Carrieroute help
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
I was finally able to setup carrierroute on Solaris
:). I am using
carrierroute in db mode and I did setup two entries with rewritehost
in carrierroute and two entries in route_tree with one route being
default.
I am still very new to carrierroute as a sample start I do have two
astersisk servers that will act as pstn_gw and I want to split the
traffic in half between both servers.
Can anyone please provide sample instructions on what to put into the
route{} statement in this scenario and any main ideas about route_tree
and carrierroute ?
Hi Ali,
a simple configuration example can be found in the docs, "Example 1.17.
Configuration example - Routing to default tree". Example database
content can be found as well, its also explained there. If you set the
server loglevel to INFO, cr will give many informations about the
routing rules it loaded, and also the routing process.
Cheers,
Henning
2:29 p.m.
As an update I did fix the error by using
cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")
instead of
cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id", "crc32")
I got one entry in route_tree with id 1 and name default
I got another entry in carrierroute table with id 1, domain =
default,prefix=00
I am using
if(!cr_route("default", "00", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")){
sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
}
I am always getting 403: Note allowed.
Well I only want to match based on prefix..no rU or otherwise
needed..somethign I missed here ?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Ali Jawad
Sent: 2009-01-23 10:42
To: Henning Westerholt; users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Carrieroute help
Hi All
I did try out that example 1.44.
I am getting this error:
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:pv_parse_spec: bad parameters Jan 23
08:40:21 [25307] INFO:carrierroute:carrier_fixup: carrier tree default
has id 3 Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:pv_parse_spec: bad
parameters Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:pv_parse_spec: bad
parameters Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:carrierroute:avp_name_fixup:
Malformed or non AVP definition <crc32> Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307]
ERROR:carrierroute:route_fixup: cannot fixup parameter 6 Jan 23 08:40:21
[25307] ERROR:core:fix_actions: fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg line 445
Jan 23 08:40:21 [25307] CRITICAL:core:fix_expr: fix_actions error Jan 23
08:40:21 [25307] ERROR:core:main: failed to fix configuration with err
code -1
Using this script:
if(!cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id", "crc32")){
sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
} else {
# In case of failure, re-route the request
t_on_failure("1");
# Relay the request to the gateway
t_relay();
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de]
Sent: 2009-01-22 13:35
To: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Cc: Ali Jawad
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Carrieroute help
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
I was finally able to setup carrierroute on Solaris
:). I am using
carrierroute in db mode and I did setup two entries with rewritehost
in carrierroute and two entries in route_tree with one route being
default.
I am still very new to carrierroute as a sample start I do have two
astersisk servers that will act as pstn_gw and I want to split the
traffic in half between both servers.
Can anyone please provide sample instructions on what to put into the
route{} statement in this scenario and any main ideas about route_tree
and carrierroute ?
Hi Ali,
a simple configuration example can be found in the docs, "Example 1.17.
Configuration example - Routing to default tree". Example database
content can be found as well, its also explained there. If you set the
server loglevel to INFO, cr will give many informations about the
routing rules it loaded, and also the routing process.
Cheers,
Henning
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
3:17 p.m.
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
As an update I did fix the error by using
cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")
instead of
cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id", "crc32")
I got one entry in route_tree with id 1 and name default
I got another entry in carrierroute table with id 1, domain =
default,prefix=00
I am using
if(!cr_route("default", "00", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")){
sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
}
I am always getting 403: Note allowed.
Well I only want to match based on prefix..no rU or otherwise
needed..somethign I missed here ?
Hi Ali,
the first '$ru' is for the prefix match, the second for the rewrite user, as
described in the docs. :-) You should get a error in the logs, that gives
more informations why the routing did not complete.
Cheers,
Henning
3:47 p.m.
Hi
Thanks for the update this is what I found
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:core:grep_sock_info: checking if port 443
matches port 443
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching
in carrier default, id 1
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: tree
default, domain default : 0
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] ERROR:carrierroute:cr_do_route: desired routing
domain doesn't exist, prefix 009613041705, carrier 1, domain 1
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de]
Sent: 2009-01-23 12:18
To: Ali Jawad
Cc: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Carrieroute help
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
As an update I did fix the error by using
cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id") instead of
cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id", "crc32")
I got one entry in route_tree with id 1 and name default I got another
entry in carrierroute table with id 1, domain =
default,prefix=00
I am using
if(!cr_route("default", "00", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")){
sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
}
I am always getting 403: Note allowed.
Well I only want to match based on prefix..no rU or otherwise
needed..somethign I missed here ?
Hi Ali,
the first '$ru' is for the prefix match, the second for the rewrite
user, as described in the docs. :-) You should get a error in the logs,
that gives more informations why the routing did not complete.
Cheers,
Henning
5:14 p.m.
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the update this is what I found
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:core:grep_sock_info: checking if port 443
matches port 443
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching
in carrier default, id 1
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: tree
default, domain default : 0
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] ERROR:carrierroute:cr_do_route: desired routing
domain doesn't exist, prefix 009613041705, carrier 1, domain 1
Hi Ali,
you get this error when the target you specified in the config is not found in
the routing tree. Do you've a domain 'default' in your database table?
Cheers,
Henning
5:25 p.m.
Hi
I was able to overcome this after I re-read the config and I got a more
clear idea about how to route_tree relates to carrierroute...now I am
getting this error
INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: rewrite_uri_recursor doesn't complete,
uri 009613041705, carrier 5, domain 0
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de]
Sent: 2009-01-23 14:14
To: Ali Jawad
Cc: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Carrieroute help
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the update this is what I found
Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:core:grep_sock_info: checking if port 443
matches port 443 Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404]
DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching in carrier default,
id 1 Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id:
tree default, domain default : 0 Jan 23 10:43:42 [25404]
ERROR:carrierroute:cr_do_route: desired routing domain doesn't exist,
prefix 009613041705, carrier 1, domain 1
Hi Ali,
you get this error when the target you specified in the config is not
found in the routing tree. Do you've a domain 'default' in your database
table?
Cheers,
Henning
5582
days inactive
5584
days old
7 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Ali Jawad -
Henning Westerholt