24 May
2019
24 May
'19
10:02 a.m.
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
*isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of available
contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding *setbflag("17",
$T_branch_idx);* there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17", $T_branch_idx))
{* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true* (for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK packet
that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since it's
the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
24 May
24 May
11:13 a.m.
I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a transaction? If so, you'd need to
use *setflag*/*isflagset*
Cheers.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець <volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
*isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of
available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding
*setbflag("17",
$T_branch_idx);* there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17",
$T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true*
(for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK packet
that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since
it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
12:10 p.m.
Hello Sergiu,
We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have
different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which
can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly
*setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different branches
independently.
Thank you!
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> пише:
I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a
transaction? If so, you'd need
to use *setflag*/*isflagset*
Cheers.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
*isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of
available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding
*setbflag("17",
$T_branch_idx);* there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17",
$T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true*
(for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK
packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since
it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2:45 p.m.
Then.. I don't know, lol
But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions
(depending on whether positive or negative reply) must be playing a role
here.
Good luck.
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець, <volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Sergiu,
We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have
different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which
can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly
*setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different
branches independently.
Thank you!
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> пише:
I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a
transaction? If so, you'd need
to use *setflag*/*isflagset*
Cheers.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
*isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of
available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding
*setbflag("17",
$T_branch_idx);* there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17",
$T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true*
(for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK
packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since
it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:06 p.m.
Branches are a creature of transactions. It follows that “branch flags” are
transaction-persistent flags at the branch level, rather than scoped to the transaction as
a whole.
ACKs constitute a separate transaction.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On May 24, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Then.. I don't know, lol
But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions (depending on whether
positive or negative reply) must be playing a role here.
Good luck.
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець,
<volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Sergiu,
We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have different
properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which can be different for
different contacts. If I understood correctly setbflag and isbflagset can set and check
flags for different branches independently.
Thank you!
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> пише:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a
transaction? If so, you'd need to use setflag/isflagset
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир
Іванець <volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions isbflagset and
isbflagset so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of available contacts and
then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding setbflag("17", $T_branch_idx);
there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added if (isbflagset("17", $T_branch_idx)) { and
additional logic. isbflagset results in true (for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK packet that gets in
route[NATMANAGE]. isbflagset results in false.
So my question is: shouldn't isbflagset be true for ACK too since it's the same
branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
28 May
28 May
12:43 p.m.
Hello Alex,
Thank you for the clarification. Now I understand this behavior.
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 22:07 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> пише:
Branches are a creature of transactions. It follows
that “branch flags”
are transaction-persistent flags at the branch level, rather than scoped to
the transaction as a whole.
ACKs constitute a separate transaction.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On May 24, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Then.. I don't know, lol
But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions
(depending on whether positive or negative reply) must be playing a role
here.
Good luck.
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець, <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Sergiu,
We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have
different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which
can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly
*setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different
branches independently.
Thank you!
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> пише:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a
transaction? If so, you'd need
to use *setflag*/*isflagset*
Cheers.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
*isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of
available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding
*setbflag("17",
$T_branch_idx);* there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17",
$T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true*
(for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK
packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since
it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
7 Jun
7 Jun
11:04 a.m.
Hello again,
I've just noticed that if new branch is created after using *t_suspend* and
*t_continue*, branch flag can not be used. Not sure if it can not be set or
checked. Doues anyone know about potential problems with such configuration?
Thanks!
вт, 28 трав. 2019 о 19:43 Володимир Іванець <volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> пише:
Hello Alex,
Thank you for the clarification. Now I understand this behavior.
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 22:07 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> пише:
Branches are a creature of transactions. It
follows that “branch flags”
are transaction-persistent flags at the branch level, rather than scoped to
the transaction as a whole.
ACKs constitute a separate transaction.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On May 24, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Then.. I don't know, lol
But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions
(depending on whether positive or negative reply) must be playing a role
here.
Good luck.
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець, <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Sergiu,
We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have
different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which
can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly
*setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different
branches independently.
Thank you!
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> пише:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a
transaction? If so, you'd
need to use *setflag*/*isflagset*
Cheers.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
> *isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
>
> Here is what I do:
> 1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of
> available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding
*setbflag("17",
> $T_branch_idx);* there.
> 2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17",
> $T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in
> *true* (for same INVITE).
> 3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK
> packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
>
> So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since
> it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
1837
days inactive
1851
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alex Balashov -
Sergiu Pojoga -
Володимир Іванець