Hi there, I'm facing an issue regarding with replies coming to kamailio that aren't processes inside of onreply_route block.
Anyone here can help me understand why these replies (1XX) aren't entering on onreply_route bock? is there any situation already identified on Kamailio that can originate this behavior?
The Kamailio version used is 5.0.1.
Thank you Regards
Hi there, I found the root cause of the problem reported on my last email.
The reason for this problem, was that i had a wrong on #!endif tag, i wrote #!enif instead of #!endif and the kamailio during the restart didn't give an error, because i have anothers #!ifdef/#!endif tag.
Regards
2017-11-03 11:21 GMT+00:00 José Seabra joseseabra4@gmail.com:
Hi there, I'm facing an issue regarding with replies coming to kamailio that aren't processes inside of onreply_route block.
Anyone here can help me understand why these replies (1XX) aren't entering on onreply_route bock? is there any situation already identified on Kamailio that can originate this behavior?
The Kamailio version used is 5.0.1.
Thank you Regards
-- José Seabra
Hello,
in such case there should be a warning log messages printed at startup if the ifdefs number is different than endif ... if it was not written, then I have to check why ...
Cheers, Daniel
On 03.11.17 14:54, José Seabra wrote:
Hi there, I found the root cause of the problem reported on my last email.
The reason for this problem, was that i had a wrong on #!endif tag, i wrote #!enif instead of #!endif and the kamailio during the restart didn't give an error, because i have anothers #!ifdef/#!endif tag.
Regards
2017-11-03 11:21 GMT+00:00 José Seabra <joseseabra4@gmail.com mailto:joseseabra4@gmail.com>:
Hi there, I'm facing an issue regarding with replies coming to kamailio that aren't processes inside of onreply_route block. Anyone here can help me understand why these replies (1XX) aren't entering on onreply_route bock? is there any situation already identified on Kamailio that can originate this behavior? The Kamailio version used is 5.0.1. Thank you Regards -- José Seabra-- Cumprimentos José Seabra
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Daniel, That warning was written, it was my mistake, i didn't have noticed the warning msg because of lot activity on logging regarding to number of calls being processed.
Sorry for the noise :)
Thank you.
Best regards
2017-11-03 14:24 GMT+00:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com:
Hello,
in such case there should be a warning log messages printed at startup if the ifdefs number is different than endif ... if it was not written, then I have to check why ... Cheers, Daniel
On 03.11.17 14:54, José Seabra wrote:
Hi there, I found the root cause of the problem reported on my last email.
The reason for this problem, was that i had a wrong on #!endif tag, i wrote #!enif instead of #!endif and the kamailio during the restart didn't give an error, because i have anothers #!ifdef/#!endif tag.
Regards
2017-11-03 11:21 GMT+00:00 José Seabra joseseabra4@gmail.com:
Hi there, I'm facing an issue regarding with replies coming to kamailio that aren't processes inside of onreply_route block.
Anyone here can help me understand why these replies (1XX) aren't entering on onreply_route bock? is there any situation already identified on Kamailio that can originate this behavior?
The Kamailio version used is 5.0.1.
Thank you Regards
-- José Seabra
-- Cumprimentos José Seabra
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 13-15, 2017, in Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
José Seabra