Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is? Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on a machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT Router is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do?
UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0 .15)
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org; serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN" interface - 192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
though
the SDP is rewritten properly.
My test setup is like this:
UA1(192.168.1.10) -- SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
- success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
- fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
- success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
- fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Folks,
Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP proxy itself can be downloaded from:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
-Maxim P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease please apply the following patch:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Maxim,
UA1 is the Nortel Networks SIP Client. I did not put it behind a NAT so as to avoid any issues. But I followed your suggestion and swapped it for another ATA186. It seems to work fine now. Made about 20 calls and all had fine audio. Any ideas why other UAs can have problems even though they are not behind a NAT??
From my observations of the rtpproxy output, I notice that when the call is
successfull I see these two lines: addr1 filled in addr2 filled in
But when there is no audio I only see: addr1 filled in
By the way we mainly use ATA186s on our network but there are a handul of others that should coexist if we were to deply the RTPProxy.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is? Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on a machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT
Router
is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do?
UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0
.15)
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org; serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN" interface - 192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
though
the SDP is rewritten properly.
My test setup is like this:
UA1(192.168.1.10) --
SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
- success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
- fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
- success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
- fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Folks,
Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP proxy itself can be downloaded from:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
-Maxim P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease please apply the following patch:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Try to disable VAD (aka silence surpression or compression) in Nortel if it supports that, it might help.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
UA1 is the Nortel Networks SIP Client. I did not put it behind a NAT so as to avoid any issues. But I followed your suggestion and swapped it for another ATA186. It seems to work fine now. Made about 20 calls and all had fine audio. Any ideas why other UAs can have problems even though they are not behind a NAT??
From my observations of the rtpproxy output, I notice that when the call is
successfull I see these two lines: addr1 filled in addr2 filled in
But when there is no audio I only see: addr1 filled in
By the way we mainly use ATA186s on our network but there are a handul of others that should coexist if we were to deply the RTPProxy.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is? Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on a machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT
Router
is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do?
UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0
.15)
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org; serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN" interface - 192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
though
the SDP is rewritten properly.
My test setup is like this:
UA1(192.168.1.10) --
SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
- success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
- fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
- success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
- fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Folks,
Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP proxy itself can be downloaded from:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
-Maxim P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease please apply the following patch:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Maxim,
The Nortel Client does not support silence suppression. You can take a look at the ngrep traces I sent and you will see that both UAs are transmitting audio to the RTPProxy, but it does not relay it to their destinations.
Regards, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 7:37 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Try to disable VAD (aka silence surpression or compression) in Nortel if it supports that, it might help.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
UA1 is the Nortel Networks SIP Client. I did not put it behind a NAT so
as
to avoid any issues. But I followed your suggestion and swapped it for another ATA186. It seems to work fine now. Made about 20 calls and all
had
fine audio. Any ideas why other UAs can have problems even though they
are
not behind a NAT??
From my observations of the rtpproxy output, I notice that when the call
is
successfull I see these two lines: addr1 filled in addr2 filled in
But when there is no audio I only see: addr1 filled in
By the way we mainly use ATA186s on our network but there are a handul
of
others that should coexist if we were to deply the RTPProxy.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is? Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on a machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT
Router
is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do?
UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0
.15)
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org; serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN"
interface -
192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
though
the SDP is rewritten properly.
My test setup is like this:
UA1(192.168.1.10) --
SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
- success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
- fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
- success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
- fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
>Folks, > >Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would >be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, >because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP >proxy itself can be downloaded from: > >https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/ > >Any feedback is greatly appreciated. > >-Maxim >P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease >please apply the following patch: > >https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers@lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >
-
>_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers@lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Use tcpdump or Ethereal to see what happenes is always a good idea.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co To: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: [Serdev] Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Hi Maxim,
UA1 is the Nortel Networks SIP Client. I did not put it behind a NAT so
as
to avoid any issues. But I followed your suggestion and swapped it for another ATA186. It seems to work fine now. Made about 20 calls and all
had
fine audio. Any ideas why other UAs can have problems even though they
are
not behind a NAT??
From my observations of the rtpproxy output, I notice that when the call
is
successfull I see these two lines: addr1 filled in addr2 filled in
But when there is no audio I only see: addr1 filled in
By the way we mainly use ATA186s on our network but there are a handul of others that should coexist if we were to deply the RTPProxy.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is? Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on
a
machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT
Router
is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do?
UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0
.15)
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org; serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN"
interface -
192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
Hi Maxim,
I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
though
the SDP is rewritten properly.
My test setup is like this:
UA1(192.168.1.10) --
SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
- success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
- fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
- success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
- fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Ricardo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Cc: serdev@lists.iptel.org Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
Folks,
Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP proxy itself can be downloaded from:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
-Maxim P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease please apply the following patch:
https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serdev mailing list serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-
Maxim Sobolev -
Ricardo Villa -
Younger Wang