10 Jun
2004
10 Jun
'04
6:42 a.m.
Hi all,
I've a problem with radius attribute Sip-Method. And this comes from a
difference between SER values for attributes and the
Draft-schulzrinne-sipping-radius-accounting-00.txt ones.
In the draft, attributes are defined this way :
0 INVITE
1 BYE
2 REGISTER
3 CANCEL
4 OPTIONS
5 ACK
6 SUBSCRIBE
7 NOTIFY
And you, you defined them :
METHOD_UNDEF=0
METHOD_INVITE=1
METHOD_CANCEL=2
METHOD_ACK=4
METHOD_BYE=8
METHOD_OTHER=16
So when I send this attributes to my radius server, the values are not coherent.
Why is it done like this. And what can I do to get some coherency?
Thanks all
Laurent
16 Jun
16 Jun
5:27 a.m.
You are right, the acc module uses internal method numbers instead of
the numbers specified in the draft, we will fix it. Thanks for the
report !
Jan.
On 10-06 12:42, l.gaillard01(a)free.fr wrote:
Hi all,
I've a problem with radius attribute Sip-Method. And this comes from a
difference between SER values for attributes and the
Draft-schulzrinne-sipping-radius-accounting-00.txt ones.
In the draft, attributes are defined this way :
0 INVITE
1 BYE
2 REGISTER
3 CANCEL
4 OPTIONS
5 ACK
6 SUBSCRIBE
7 NOTIFY
And you, you defined them :
METHOD_UNDEF=0
METHOD_INVITE=1
METHOD_CANCEL=2
METHOD_ACK=4
METHOD_BYE=8
METHOD_OTHER=16
So when I send this attributes to my radius server, the values are not coherent.
Why is it done like this. And what can I do to get some coherency?
Thanks all
Laurent
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5:33 a.m.
iana defines these methods:
Methods and Response Codes - per [RFC3261] Section 27.4
--------------------------
Methods Reference
------- ---------
ACK [RFC3261]
BYE [RFC3261]
CANCEL [RFC3261]
INFO [RFC2976]
INVITE [RFC3261]
NOTIFY [RFC3265]
OPTIONS [RFC3261]
PRACK [RFC3262]
REGISTER [RFC3261]
SUBSCRIBE [RFC3265]
UPDATE [RFC3311]
MESSAGE [RFC3428]
REFER [RFC3515]
so perhaps all of them should be include.
-- juha
6:17 a.m.
Yes, but IANA does not specify the code for them (at least I did not
find it). The only document I was able to find was the already expired
draft-schulzrinne-sipping-radius-accounting-00
Is there anything more up to date ?
Jan.
On 16-06 12:33, Juha Heinanen wrote:
iana defines these methods:
Methods and Response Codes - per [RFC3261] Section 27.4
--------------------------
Methods Reference
------- ---------
ACK [RFC3261]
BYE [RFC3261]
CANCEL [RFC3261]
INFO [RFC2976]
INVITE [RFC3261]
NOTIFY [RFC3265]
OPTIONS [RFC3261]
PRACK [RFC3262]
REGISTER [RFC3261]
SUBSCRIBE [RFC3265]
UPDATE [RFC3311]
MESSAGE [RFC3428]
REFER [RFC3515]
so perhaps all of them should be include.
-- juha
6:33 a.m.
Jan Janak writes:
Yes, but IANA does not specify the code for them (at
least I did not
find it). The only document I was able to find was the already expired
draft-schulzrinne-sipping-radius-accounting-00.
Is there anything more up to date ?
i don't think so. we would just need to invent codes for the rest or
just ignore schulzrinne compliance and keep existing codes as they and
add the new ones (my vote).
-- juha
7322
days inactive
7328
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jan Janak -
Juha Heinanen -
l.gaillard01＠free.fr