Hi Everybody,
I have a new SIP UA, what (related to RFC3261 -> 10.2.4) needs the same Concact header in the incoming "200 OK", what was sent out.
I have found this thread about the topic:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-March/016164.html
Can sy help me to implement this ?? Do sy have a working example, how can I avoid the NAT problem ?
I use nathelper and SER 0.9.4..
Thanks, Mihaly
Mihaly Zachar wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I have a new SIP UA, what (related to RFC3261 -> 10.2.4) needs the same Concact header in the incoming "200 OK", what was sent out.
I have found this thread about the topic:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-March/016164.html
Can sy help me to implement this ?? Do sy have a working example, how can I avoid the NAT problem ?
I use nathelper and SER 0.9.4..
use fix_nated_register() instead of fix_nated_contact()
regards klaus
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Mihaly Zachar wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I have a new SIP UA, what (related to RFC3261 -> 10.2.4) needs the same Concact header in the incoming "200 OK", what was sent out.
I have found this thread about the topic:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-March/016164.html
Can sy help me to implement this ?? Do sy have a working example, how can I avoid the NAT problem ?
I use nathelper and SER 0.9.4..
use fix_nated_register() instead of fix_nated_contact()
Thanks for the quick answer...
I have tried that, but unfortunately I checked a wrong database :(((
It works well now!!
Thanks, Misi