15 Jun
2007
15 Jun
'07
4:16 a.m.
Hi,
I would like to block messages for particular UAs because some of my phones behave in such
a manner that they do not respond to MESSAGE message.
I would like to make I filter basing on the ruri.
How can I compare ruri namepart with a particular value??
will something like this work
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
There would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers and there is no
MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field the offline messages are not dumped to
the UA.
Cheers
Thanks in advanced
Tomasz
15 Jun
15 Jun
4:45 a.m.
Hi Tomasz,
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-)
There would be nice to have such functionality that
when UA registers
and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
Vaclav
Cheers
Thanks in advanced
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5:13 a.m.
On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart wrote:
if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more elegant
way
Michal
Hi Tomasz,
Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-) There would be
nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
18 Jun
18 Jun
3:08 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] How to block m_dump() for some users
Thanks :),
How are the regular expression evaluated in ser.cfg??
Are they evaluated from right to left??
For instance if I have: if( A && B)
is it like this that B is evaluated first and if B evaluates to logical FALSE A is not
evaluated at all??
Cheers
Tomasz
On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart
wrote:
if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more elegant
way
Michal
Hi Tomasz,
Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-) There
would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
3:23 a.m.
I guess, that expressions are evaluated from left to right, but I'm not
sure...
Vaclav
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:08:56AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks :),
How are the regular expression evaluated in ser.cfg??
Are they evaluated from right to left??
For instance if I have: if( A && B)
is it like this that B is evaluated first and if B evaluates to logical FALSE A is not
evaluated at all??
Cheers
Tomasz
On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart
wrote:
if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more elegant
way
Michal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Hi Tomasz,
Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-) There
would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
3:20 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] How to block m_dump() for some users
Hi,
Michal when I check the condition for Allow header I get the following:
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: Unable to resolve select 'Allow' at level 2
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: BUG: route.c:358: Unable to resolve select
Cheers
Tomasz
On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart
wrote:
if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more elegant
way
Michal
Hi Tomasz,
Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-) There
would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
10:35 a.m.
Hi Tomasz,
its strange, I'll check when I get some time for it.
Do you use 2.0.rcX or HEAD?
Anyway, you can temporarilly use @hf_value from textops for the same
purpose...
Expressions are evalueated form left to right, so
if (A && B) - if A is false, B is not evaluated at all...
Michal
On Po, 2007-06-18 at 09:20 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Michal when I check the condition for Allow header I get the following:
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: Unable to resolve select 'Allow' at level 2
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: BUG: route.c:358: Unable to resolve select
Cheers
Tomasz
> On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > > if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
> >
> > something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-)
>
> Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")
>
> > > There would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
> > > and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
> > > the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
> >
> > You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
> > triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
> > expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
>
> if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more
elegant way
>
> Michal
>
6341
days inactive
6345
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Michal Matyska -
tzieleniewski -
Vaclav Kubart