Hello list, has anybody else tried using SIREMIS 2.0 for administrating LCR tables

in kamailio 3.1.0? I am not happy with the form / input boxes that are presented in the web browser, because some fields are not as expected..... Following points are - from my point of view - incorrect: 1) table "LCR_Gateway_List": the fields 'URI-scheme', 'Transport' and 'Strip' are represented by checkboxes. However, in reality these fields are defined with smallint(3) types and e.g. transport is representing values from NULL...4 - not boolean! 2) table "LCR_Target_List": the field priority is represented by a checkbox, too. However, also this field is not boolean. Priorities are

represented by numbers, starting with '0' = highest priority a.s.o. Can anybody check if this "problem" is a real one, or only present on my PC? I have tested with IE and Firefox - the result is still the

regards, Klaus _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Hello, On 11/8/10 11:29 AM, Lee Archer wrote: the project has an svn repository hosted on sourceforge.net, but it still has the sources of 1.0.x. it will be fixed in the near future Re-download the tar ball from the web, it has now the fixes for lcr and siremis own-user management: http://siremis.asipto.com/pub/downloads/siremis/siremis-2.0.0.tgz Cheers, Daniel Regards -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

When editing an LCR gateway values of 0 aren't populated in the Edit page but with LCR the value for Flags are mandatory in the web interface. Is this an issue?

Regards Lee *From:* sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *X- x -X *Sent:* 08 November 2010 15:02 *To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla; sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table editing?? This is good to know that things those few things have been fixed. I only learned it from this email. Shouldn't the fixes info be transmitted like with a patched version ( siremis 2.0.1 ) or something. Anyway good jobs guyz, dont take me as a thankless user. Cheers -- On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, On 11/8/10 11:29 AM, Lee Archer wrote: Hi, does Siremis have some sort of SVN where the latest branch with updates can be downloaded or do we need to wait until you release the fixed version? the project has an svn repository hosted on sourceforge.net <http://sourceforge.net>, but it still has the sources of 1.0.x. it will be fixed in the near future Re-download the tar ball from the web, it has now the fixes for lcr and siremis own-user management: http://siremis.asipto.com/pub/downloads/siremis/siremis-2.0.0.tgz Cheers, Daniel Regards Lee -----Original Message----- From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org> [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org>] On Behalf Of Elena-Ramona Modroiu Sent: 05 November 2010 09:40 To: Klaus Feichtinger Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table editing?? Hi, thanks for reporting. It will be fixed soon. Regards, Ramona On 11/04/2010 02:16 PM, Klaus Feichtinger wrote: Hello list, has anybody else tried using SIREMIS 2.0 for administrating LCR tables in kamailio 3.1.0? I am not happy with the form / input boxes that are presented in the web browser, because some fields are not as expected..... Following points are - from my point of view - incorrect: 1) table "LCR_Gateway_List": the fields 'URI-scheme', 'Transport' and 'Strip' are represented by checkboxes. However, in reality these fields are defined with smallint(3) types and e.g. transport is representing values from NULL...4 - not boolean! 2) table "LCR_Target_List": the field priority is represented by a checkbox, too. However, also this field is not boolean. Priorities are represented by numbers, starting with '0' = highest priority a.s.o. Can anybody check if this "problem" is a real one, or only present on my PC? I have tested with IE and Firefox - the result is still the same. regards, Klaus _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users