Please copy the list.
It depends on what you want to achieve.
Blind forwarding is to me the following:
- Check if this is a local user (myself)
- Check if this is an alias (lookup("aliases"))
- Check if the AOR is registered (lookup("location"))
- Check if the user has blind call forwarding
- If no, relay to looked up location
- If yes, rewrite ruri. (Then what you do depends on your setup
complexity, either you forward to PSTN, so just rewrite to GW and relay,
or you allow recursive forwarding. Then you need to either relay to
yourself or call a route that runs the above described process. Or
simpler, you can do as you do by duplicating the lookups, now with the
new ruri. Then you allow only one step of forwarding, not recursive.)
g-)
Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com wrote:
I think so, because we need to check is r-uri (to which call get
forwarded) is registered or not.
I am newbie if anything wrong please suggests me.
Thanks in anticipation
Kamal Mann
** **
*From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:19 PM
*To:* Mann, Kamal
*Cc:* serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
*Subject:* Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
You do lookup("aliases") and lookup("location") AFTER you have
changed
the uri through avp_pushto from usr_preferences.
Is this really what you want?
g-)
Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com <mailto:Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com> wrote:
Hi All
I want to setup Blind call forwarding. Like if a uri - mann(a)iptel.org
<mailto:mann@iptel.org>
is not registered with SER but this user had already configured in ser
database table usr_prefrences that his call should be forwarde to
another uri kamal(a)iptel.org <mailto:kamal@iptel.org>. For that my usr_prefrence
table is like
USR_PREFRENCES table
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
+
---------------+
| uuid | username | domain | attribute | value | type
|
modified |
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
+
----------------+
| | bhaskar | debian | callfwd | kamal(a)iptel.org
<mailto:kamal@iptel.org>
| 0 | 20060926165852 |
| | mann |
iptel.org | callfwd | sip:kamal@iptel.org
<mailto:sip:kamal@iptel.org> | 0
|
20060926150443 |
| | prateek |
iptel.org | callfwd | kamal(a)iptel.org
<mailto:kamal@iptel.org> | 0
|
20060926170701 |
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
+
----------------+
Is this entry is correct?? Is there any flaw in my ser.cfg??
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Kamal Mann
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Blair [mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:26 PM
To: Mann, Kamal
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
Does your config file relay REFER messages? It needs to in order to
perform the transfer.
Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com <mailto:Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com> wrote:
Hi all
Please help out
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Mann, Kamal
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:46 PM
*To:* 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>'
*Subject:* RE: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
Hi all
I am implementing Blind call forwarding with 0.9.6 SER version. But
with current configuration it's not working. Please help on same.
I am enclosing small part of usr_prefrences table & my ser.cfg.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers