Hello to everybody,
I have openser 1.1 installed on a machine which has an ADSL internet connection.
My question is: as the ip address is a public IP (80.xxxx...), do I need any module for nat tunneling? (mediaproxy or nathelper...) I mean, if all the UAs are connected to internet via ADSL (different providers), do I need to set NAT modules?
Thanks Alex
I have openser 1.1 installed on a machine which has an ADSL internet connection.
My question is: as the ip address is a public IP (80.xxxx...), do I need any module for nat tunneling? (mediaproxy or nathelper...) I mean, if all the UAs are connected to internet via ADSL (different providers), do I need to set NAT modules?
yes, you do. I recommend mediaproxy...
On 05/05/2006 11:37 AM, buxalex@libero.it wrote:
Hello to everybody,
I have openser 1.1 installed on a machine which has an ADSL internet connection.
My question is: as the ip address is a public IP (80.xxxx...), do I need any module for nat tunneling? (mediaproxy or nathelper...) I mean, if all the UAs are connected to internet via ADSL (different providers), do I need to set NAT modules?
If all of them are connected from public IP addresses which are not behind NAT, then you do not need nathelper or mediaproxy. But if the users are behind a router which connect to ADSL, then it is very likely that they are behind a NAT as well. Both nat traversal modules from openser include functions to detect whether a client is behind nat or not.
Cheers, Daniel
Thanks Alex
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi, I wanna know how to use OpenSER with redundancy and scaling.
Example:
the user 1000 can register in ser A.com and in ser b.com. and the users that have a 1000 as contact can see the PA in the 2 case, ( 1000@a.com and 1000@b.com) but don´t send the subscriber to 2 users.
is this posible ? best regards
Javier
On Monday 08 May 2006 03:18, Javier Ramirez wrote:
Perhaps you should look into DNS SRV records for your domain, so that all requests routed to proxy.com will routed to openser1.proxy.com, openser2.proxy.com, and openser3.proxy.com based on a weighting system.
With a clustered database backend, such as MySQL cluster, you have gained redundancy.
Can anyone else comment on possible problems with using one database for many OpenSER instances, all sharing the same tables, etc.?
---Mike
Hi, I wanna know how to use OpenSER with redundancy and scaling.
Example:
the user 1000 can register in ser A.com and in ser b.com. and the users that have a 1000 as contact can see the PA in the 2 case, ( 1000@a.com and 1000@b.com) but don´t send the subscriber to 2 users.
is this posible ? best regards
Javier
-
buxalex＠libero.it -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Henri Keski-Sikkilä -
Javier Ramirez -
Mike Williams