18 Jan
2008
18 Jan
'08
4:40 p.m.
Hi,
I have the followning natted contact in my location table:
mysql> select * from location where uid ='tw(a)sip.touk.pl'.pl';
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| contact | flags |
received |
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| sip:tw@192.168.7.2 | 1 |
sip:80.53.110.142:61066;dstip=192.168.129.74;dstport=5060
|
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
when I invoke lookup_contacts the ruri has local address
192.168.7.2instead of public one.
Is this correct behaviour?
Please point me is this should work as I think.
Thank You for any help
Tomasz
18 Jan
18 Jan
7:58 p.m.
it is correct, it will have received as next hop address where to send the
message to.
sam.
2008/1/18, Tomasz Zieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
I have the followning natted contact in my location table:
mysql> select * from location where uid ='tw(a)sip.touk.pl'.pl';
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| contact | flags |
received |
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| sip:tw@192.168.7.2 | 1 | sip:80.53.110.142:61066;dstip=
192.168.129.74;dstport=5060 |
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
when I invoke lookup_contacts the ruri has local address 192.168.7.2instead of public
one.
Is this correct behaviour?
Please point me is this should work as I think.
Thank You for any help
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
19 Jan
19 Jan
12:50 a.m.
Hi,
You mean that the ruri will be set with the local IP but the message next
hop destination will be set to the sip:80.53.110.142:61066 or to
destip:destport?
The same destination which is for instance set with the usage of attr2dest
function?
-tomasz
On Jan 18, 2008 6:58 PM, samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com> wrote:
it is correct, it will have received as next hop address where to send the
message to.
sam.
2008/1/18, Tomasz Zieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)gmail.com >:
Hi,
I have the followning natted contact in my location table:
mysql> select * from location where uid =' tw(a)sip.touk.pl'#39;;
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| contact | flags |
received |
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| sip:tw@192.168.7.2 | 1 | sip:80.53.110.142:61066;dstip=192.168.129.74;dstport=5060
|
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
when I invoke lookup_contacts the ruri has local address 192.168.7.2instead of public
one.
Is this correct behaviour?
Please point me is this should work as I think.
Thank You for any help
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
21 Jan
21 Jan
11:18 a.m.
The req-URI will contain the value of location's contact field and the
received will be placed in an internal structure as destination so the SIP
message is sent there.
I am not sure about the attr2dest function but I guess both functions
(lookup and att2dest) affects the same destination field. Someone with more
internal knowledge would have to assure this.
Regards,
Samuel.
2008/1/18, Tomasz Zieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
You mean that the ruri will be set with the local IP but the message next
hop destination will be set to the sip:80.53.110.142:61066 or to
destip:destport?
The same destination which is for instance set with the usage of attr2dest
function?
-tomasz
On Jan 18, 2008 6:58 PM, samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com > wrote:
it is correct, it will have received as next hop address where to send
the message to.
sam.
2008/1/18, Tomasz Zieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)gmail.com >:
Hi,
I have the followning natted contact in my location table:
mysql> select * from location where uid =' tw(a)sip.touk.pl'#39;;
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| contact | flags |
received |
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| sip:tw@192.168.7.2 | 1 | sip:80.53.110.142:61066;dstip=192.168.129.74;dstport=5060
|
+--------------------+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
when I invoke lookup_contacts the ruri has local address 192.168.7.2instead of public
one.
Is this correct behaviour?
Please point me is this should work as I think.
Thank You for any help
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6180
days inactive
6183
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
samuel -
Tomasz Zieleniewski