22 Jun
2005
22 Jun
'05
1 a.m.
Ok, just to recap - cos Im getting a little bit confused ;)
I have two choices(?)
1. Somehow invoke sipsak to configure permanent addresses with a
particular q value.
2. Develop a FIFO method to change q value.
Am I correct in thinking directly modifying the usrloc table in the
database is out of the question because the changes cant be updated
except by SER itself in which case a reboot would required - Correct?
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable for per user
configurable sequential forking?
Have others tried to implement similar functionality or is it usually
a generic site wide sequential forking policy?
Many thanks for the opinions and help so far.
Aisling.
---- Original Message ----
From: jh(a)tutpro.com
To: greger(a)teigre.com
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:54 +0300
check
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to
whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional
privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly
prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information
electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this
communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
Greger V. Teigre writes:
> :-D Yes, that is true. But I didn't know that you could change
q-value in
FIFO?
if that is not possible, then you can always use sipsak to install
"permanent" registrations with a given q value. sipsak has an
additional advantage over fifo in that you can apply permissions to sipsak registration, but not to fifo
registration.
-- juha
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
only for the
person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
> 
22 Jun
22 Jun
1:30 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
You could definitely query the current bindings with sipsak, check the q value
in some script language and the re-insert the binding with the fixed q value
(if required). But that really sounds cumbersome to me...
Nils
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 23:00, Aisling O'Driscoll wrote:
Ok, just to recap - cos Im getting a little bit
confused ;)
I have two choices(?)
1. Somehow invoke sipsak to configure permanent addresses with a
particular q value.
2. Develop a FIFO method to change q value.
Am I correct in thinking directly modifying the usrloc table in the
database is out of the question because the changes cant be updated
except by SER itself in which case a reboot would required - Correct?
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable for per user
configurable sequential forking?
Have others tried to implement similar functionality or is it usually
a generic site wide sequential forking policy?
Many thanks for the opinions and help so far.
Aisling.
---- Original Message ----
From: jh(a)tutpro.com
To: greger(a)teigre.com
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:54 +0300
check
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only
for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by
legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error
please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any
unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited.
The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information
electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained
in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as
transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Greger V. Teigre writes:
> :-D Yes, that is true. But I didn't know that you could change
q-value in
FIFO?
if that is not possible, then you can always use sipsak to install
"permanent" registrations with a given q value. sipsak has an
additional advantage over fifo in that you can apply permissions to sipsak registration, but not to fifo
registration.
-- juha
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt. 
8:42 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Aisling O'Driscoll wrote:
Ok, just to recap - cos Im getting a little bit
confused ;)
I have two choices(?)
1. Somehow invoke sipsak to configure permanent addresses with a
particular q value.
2. Develop a FIFO method to change q value.
Yes. Except that I don't know if anybody verified that q value cannot be
changed with today's FIFO. I just asked the question...
Am I correct in thinking directly modifying the usrloc
table in the
database is out of the question because the changes cant be updated
except by SER itself in which case a reboot would required - Correct?
Correct. "SER itself" is here either serctl, sipsak or FIFO.
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable
for per user
configurable sequential forking?
I don't know about that. There is definitely a q-value based functionality
there.
Have others tried to implement similar functionality
or is it usually
a generic site wide sequential forking policy?
I think using CPL could be an option. Have you looked at CPL and the cpl
module?
g-)
Many thanks for the opinions and help so far.
Aisling.
---- Original Message ----
From: jh(a)tutpro.com
To: greger(a)teigre.com
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:54 +0300
check
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt. Greger V. Teigre writes:
> :-D Yes, that is true. But I didn't know that you could change
q-value in
FIFO?
if that is not possible, then you can always use sipsak to install
"permanent" registrations with a given q value. sipsak has an
additional advantage over fifo in that you can apply permissions to sipsak registration, but not to fifo
registration.
-- juha
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
only for the
person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
>
2:46 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers]CPL - Portal for forking call to preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Hello,
Many thanks for the ideas so far.
I looked at CPL Greger and I think that provides a very simple solution
to this - a simple Call forward on no answer script.
I have an included an example that I came across below. If a user wants
to modify the order of the devices a call should be sent to, then I
simply have to retrieve the information from the user via the web
interface and provision a new cpl script. I think this solves the
problem - Does anyone foresee any problems with this or think it has
disadvantages?
I do have two minor questions if I am to go ahead with this direction
though:
1) If a particular user already has a cpl script e.g. a call screening
script uploaded to the database and they then upload this forward on no
answer script, will it overwrite the original script? i.e. can there
only be one cpl script per user?
2)How can a cpl script be "undone" or deleted? Must it be overwritten or
is there a way of simply removing it(without using mysql commands)?
Example CPL: Call Forward on No Answer
<?xml version="1.0">
<cpl>
<subaction id="phone2">
<location url="sip:2000@phone2">
<proxy />
</location>
</subaction>
<incoming>
<location url="sip:2000@phone1">
<proxy timeout="8">
<noanswer>
<sub ref="phone2"/>
</noanswer>
</proxy>
</location>
</incoming>
</cpl>
Many Thanks,
Aisling.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: 22 June 2005 05:42
To: Aisling O'Driscoll; jh(a)tutpro.com
Cc: samuel.osorio(a)nl.thalesgroup.com; ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie;
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Aisling O'Driscoll wrote:
Ok, just to recap - cos Im getting a little bit
confused ;)
I have two choices(?)
1. Somehow invoke sipsak to configure permanent addresses with a
particular q value.
2. Develop a FIFO method to change q value.
Yes. Except that I don't know if anybody verified that q value cannot be
changed with today's FIFO. I just asked the question...
Am I correct in thinking directly modifying the usrloc
table in the
database is out of the question because the changes cant be updated
except by SER itself in which case a reboot would required - Correct?
Correct. "SER itself" is here either serctl, sipsak or FIFO.
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable
for per user
configurable sequential forking?
I don't know about that. There is definitely a q-value based
functionality
there.
Have others tried to implement similar functionality
or is it usually
a generic site wide sequential forking policy?
I think using CPL could be an option. Have you looked at CPL and the cpl
module?
g-)
Many thanks for the opinions and help so far.
Aisling.
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only
for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by
legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in
error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any
unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly
prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any
information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the
information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete
record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in
its receipt.
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to
whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional
privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly
prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information
electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this
communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
---- Original Message ----
From: jh(a)tutpro.com
To: greger(a)teigre.com
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:54 +0300
check
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt. Greger V. Teigre writes:
> :-D Yes, that is true. But I didn't know that you could change
q-value in
FIFO?
if that is not possible, then you can always use sipsak to install
"permanent" registrations with a given q value. sipsak has an
additional advantage over fifo in that you can apply permissions to sipsak registration, but not to fifo
registration.
-- juha
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
only for the
person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
> 
10:31 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Aisling O'Driscoll writes:
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable
for per user
configurable sequential forking?
it is suitable, once you have first somehow got the contacts into
destination set. sipsak is one possibility for doing so.
-- juha
7084
days inactive
7085
days old
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Aisling -
Aisling O'Driscoll
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Juha Heinanen -
Nils Ohlmeier