7 Nov
2005
7 Nov
'05
12:14 p.m.
hi,
i run an SER which supports multiple realms. all works fine,
authentication, calls etc. except one thing:
we are in the rare sitiuation of having the same number-block in two
different cities. i have aliases for my users (username is areacode
+number) which is only the number (without area-code) to support
dialing without area-code. but in the case with the two same blocks
in different area-codes the alias handling gets a bit confused:
# serctl alias show 88999998
<sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311264
<sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311264
so i have two aliases for the same number. any of the numbers is in
different SIP_DOMAINS, namely 04712.sip... and 04711.sip..., but even
when i state the SIP_DOMAIN to use for the lookup stuff i get:
# SIP_DOMAIN=04712.sip.domain.de serctl alias show 88999998
<sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311207
<sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311207
and of course the other way round with 04711. the realm/domain is
stored within the alias, so there are two records:
88999998 04711.sip.domain.de sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de ...
88999998 04712.sip.domain.de sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de ...
with different domains. now, what happens is: when a user from the
04711 area-code calls another user (for him in that same area), he/
she might end up reaching a user with the 04712 area-code. even
though the INVITE messages and all state, that the particular (any)
user is from the 04711 domain, or 04712 for that matter ...
i also tried to name the alias 88999998(a)04712.sip... and so on, but
then, it doesn't even find an alias at all.
what did i miss?
oh, and yes, both realms are defined via an alias-directive in
SER.cfg so he treats both as local (or at least it should).
any hint would be appreciated.
brgds,
g. feiner
7 Nov
7 Nov
2:21 p.m.
I'm not sure exactly how the aliases table handles domains if you put them in
directly, but I can tell you that serctl cannot handle domains properly with
the alias table. Something in the way it passes $SERUSER@$SERDOMAIN to the
ul_add function of the fifo.... not sure, but it never actually adds a domain
in the domain column whether you have SIP_DOMAIN set or if you use the form
serctl add blah@domain sip:address
Neither one populates the domain column of the aliases table with anything,
so, though I haven't looked at the fifo code, I'm of the opinion that
multi-domain handling for aliases isn't quite there yet with the rest of the
code.
Have you checked the aliases table to see if domains are getting entere into
the domain column?
N.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:14:12 +0100, Gerd Feiner wrote
hi,
i run an SER which supports multiple realms. all works fine,
authentication, calls etc. except one thing:
we are in the rare sitiuation of having the same number-block in two
different cities. i have aliases for my users (username is
areacode +number) which is only the number (without area-code) to
support dialing without area-code. but in the case with the two
same blocks in different area-codes the alias handling gets a bit confused:
# serctl alias show 88999998
<sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311264
<sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311264
so i have two aliases for the same number. any of the numbers is in
different SIP_DOMAINS, namely 04712.sip... and 04711.sip..., but
even when i state the SIP_DOMAIN to use for the lookup stuff i get:
# SIP_DOMAIN=04712.sip.domain.de serctl alias show 88999998
<sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311207
<sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311207
and of course the other way round with 04711. the realm/domain is
stored within the alias, so there are two records:
88999998 04711.sip.domain.de sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de
... 88999998 04712.sip.domain.de
sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de ...
with different domains. now, what happens is: when a user from the
04711 area-code calls another user (for him in that same area), he/
she might end up reaching a user with the 04712 area-code. even
though the INVITE messages and all state, that the particular (any)
user is from the 04711 domain, or 04712 for that matter ...
i also tried to name the alias 88999998(a)04712.sip... and so on, but
then, it doesn't even find an alias at all.
what did i miss?
oh, and yes, both realms are defined via an alias-directive in
SER.cfg so he treats both as local (or at least it should).
any hint would be appreciated.
brgds,
g. feiner
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
4:55 p.m.
hi,
Am 07.11.2005 um 20:21 schrieb sip:
I'm not sure exactly how the aliases table handles
domains if you
put them in
directly, but I can tell you that serctl cannot handle domains
properly with
the alias table. Something in the way it passes $SERUSER@$SERDOMAIN
to the
ul_add function of the fifo.... not sure, but it never actually
adds a domain
in the domain column whether you have SIP_DOMAIN set or if you use
the form
serctl add blah@domain sip:address
this is what i found out. yes.
Neither one populates the domain column of the aliases table with
anything,
so, though I haven't looked at the fifo code, I'm of the opinion that
multi-domain handling for aliases isn't quite there yet with the
rest of the
code.
Have you checked the aliases table to see if domains are getting
entere into
the domain column?
no, i don't put entries in the subscriber table with serctl/serweb,
we created our own webinterface which is why i actually _have_ the
sip-domain in the alias table. don't know, if anybody ever came
across this issue, but i think it will not be too unlikely in the
future to have the same number-block in different areas.
maybe this is something the developers should look into.
brgds,
gerd
N.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:14:12 +0100, Gerd Feiner wrote
hi,
i run an SER which supports multiple realms. all works fine,
authentication, calls etc. except one thing:
we are in the rare sitiuation of having the same number-block in two
different cities. i have aliases for my users (username is
areacode +number) which is only the number (without area-code) to
support dialing without area-code. but in the case with the two
same blocks in different area-codes the alias handling gets a bit
confused:
# serctl alias show 88999998
<sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311264
<sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311264
so i have two aliases for the same number. any of the numbers is in
different SIP_DOMAINS, namely 04712.sip... and 04711.sip..., but
even when i state the SIP_DOMAIN to use for the lookup stuff i get:
# SIP_DOMAIN=04712.sip.domain.de serctl alias show 88999998
<sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311207
<sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de>;q=1;expires=459311207
and of course the other way round with 04711. the realm/domain is
stored within the alias, so there are two records:
88999998 04711.sip.domain.de sip:0471188999998@04711.sip.domain.de
... 88999998 04712.sip.domain.de
sip:0471288999998@04712.sip.domain.de ...
with different domains. now, what happens is: when a user from the
04711 area-code calls another user (for him in that same area), he/
she might end up reaching a user with the 04712 area-code. even
though the INVITE messages and all state, that the particular (any)
user is from the 04711 domain, or 04712 for that matter ...
i also tried to name the alias 88999998(a)04712.sip... and so on, but
then, it doesn't even find an alias at all.
what did i miss?
oh, and yes, both realms are defined via an alias-directive in
SER.cfg so he treats both as local (or at least it should).
any hint would be appreciated.
brgds,
g. feiner
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6796
days inactive
6796
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Gerd Feiner -
sip