Hi,
I have testing openser 1.2.0 with seas module and wesip.
If I send an INVITE message with a Route header, the SIP servlet receives the INVITE with the full Route Header, and when I proxy it the Route is the same, but I expected that the top most Route header has been removed. Who is in charge to do it? openser or wesip? I first thought it might be openser through loose_route(), but it seems not to be the case.
The openser cfg file is similar to the example given in wesip tutorial:
route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); exit; };
xlog("L_INFO", "$rm: ci=$ci ft=$ft tt=$tt cseq=$cs ruri:$ru received from: $si:$sp \n");
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
if (loose_route()) { xlog("L_INFO", "RR enforced\n"); append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); };
if (uri==myself) { xlog("L_INFO", "uri == myself"); if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); exit; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { xlog("L_INFO", "outbound alias\n"); append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; }; xlog("L_INFO", "usrloc applied\n"); append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); }; route(1); }
route[1] { if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ t_reply("500","Application Server error"); } }
route[2] { xlog ("L_INFO", "$rm: cseq:$cs $ru: RELAYING (PROXY) to $du (flags: $mF) ...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit;
}
This the log from wesip:
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasMessageEvent [SeasRouter]- New message received, from 10.161.14.10:6025 to 10.161.14.10:7000 over UDP 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasTransactionEvent [SeasRouter]- hash_index = 60870,label=1842040723 flags=0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- peerAddress = 10.161.14.10/6025 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- About to process INVITE sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipConnector [ExpressMChannel[76]]- createProcessor: Reusing existing processor 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO SipProcessor [ExpressMChannel[76]]- An incoming message is being assigned 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- Done processing INVITE sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- <<<<<<<<< Request Received <<<<<<<<< INVITE sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:6025;branch=z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 Contact: sip:10.161.14.10:6025;transport=UDP Max-Forwards: 14 From: sip:user1@mot.net;tag=6661 To: sip:user2@mot.net Supported: 100rel Route: sip:10.161.14.10:7000;lr=on,sip:10.161.14.10:6025;lr=on Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 337
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasHashTable [SipProcessor[3]]- Inserting hashIdx:60870 label:1842040723 into hashTable 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- Transaction [ z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101] is new Transaction?? --> true 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG EngineSipMapper [SipProcessor[3]]- Request from 10.161.14.10 mapped to: ConvergedEngine[Standalone].StandardHttpHost[localhost] 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedEngineValve [SipProcessor[3]]- Invoking Host:localhost 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHostValve [SipProcessor[3]]- SipSession not found for requestINVITE, trying match against Rules 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHost [SipProcessor[3]]- Mapped request to:/sampleservlet 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedContextValve [SipProcessor[3]]- new session created :1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- Creating Express message channel 10.161.14.10/7000 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- setting spiral=false 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipRequest [SipProcessor[3]]- >>>>>>>>> Sending Request >>>>>>>>> INVITE sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 14 From: sip:user1@mot.net;tag=83FBA2EBC5A9EE4615D194DECA1EE955 To: sip:user2@mot.net Supported: 100rel Route: sip:10.161.14.10:7000;lr=on,sip:10.161.14.10:6025;lr=on CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 Contact: sip:10.161.14.10:7000;transport=udp P-AS-Hint: B2BUA Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:7000;branch=z9hG4bK2137041384 Content-Length: 337
Thanks in advance
Hello,
openser via loose_route() will remove top most Route header if it is added by the proxy (matches local IP addresses and aliases).
Cheers, Daniel
On 04/27/07 15:54, Jose Antonio Garvayo wrote:
Hi,
I have testing openser 1.2.0 with seas module and wesip.
If I send an INVITE message with a Route header, the SIP servlet receives the INVITE with the full Route Header, and when I proxy it the Route is the same, but I expected that the top most Route header has been removed. Who is in charge to do it? openser or wesip? I first thought it might be openser through loose_route(), but it seems not to be the case.
The openser cfg file is similar to the example given in wesip tutorial:
route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); exit; };
xlog("L_INFO", "$rm: ci=$ci ft=$ft tt=$tt cseq=$cs ruri:$ru
received from: $si:$sp \n");
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); if (loose_route()) { xlog("L_INFO", "RR enforced\n"); append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); }; if (uri==myself) { xlog("L_INFO", "uri == myself"); if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); exit; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { xlog("L_INFO", "outbound alias\n"); append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; }; xlog("L_INFO", "usrloc applied\n"); append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); }; route(1);
}
route[1] { if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ t_reply("500","Application Server error"); } }
route[2] { xlog ("L_INFO", "$rm: cseq:$cs $ru: RELAYING (PROXY) to $du (flags: $mF) ...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit;
}
This the log from wesip:
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasMessageEvent [SeasRouter]- New message received, from 10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025 to 10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000 over UDP 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasTransactionEvent [SeasRouter]- hash_index = 60870,label=1842040723 flags=0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- peerAddress = 10.161.14.10/6025 http://10.161.14.10/6025 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- About to process INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipConnector [ExpressMChannel[76]]- createProcessor: Reusing existing processor 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO SipProcessor [ExpressMChannel[76]]- An incoming message is being assigned 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- Done processing INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- <<<<<<<<< Request Received <<<<<<<<< INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;branch=z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 Contact: <sip:10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;transport=UDP> Max-Forwards: 14 From: <sip:user1@mot.net mailto:sip:user1@mot.net>;tag=6661 To: <sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> Supported: 100rel Route: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;lr=on>,<sip:10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;lr=on> Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 337
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasHashTable [SipProcessor[3]]- Inserting hashIdx:60870 label:1842040723 into hashTable 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- Transaction [ z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101] is new Transaction?? --> true 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG EngineSipMapper [SipProcessor[3]]- Request from 10.161.14.10 http://10.161.14.10 mapped to: ConvergedEngine[Standalone].StandardHttpHost[localhost] 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedEngineValve [SipProcessor[3]]- Invoking Host:localhost 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHostValve [SipProcessor[3]]- SipSession not found for requestINVITE, trying match against Rules 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHost [SipProcessor[3]]- Mapped request to:/sampleservlet 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedContextValve [SipProcessor[3]]- new session created : 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- Creating Express message channel 10.161.14.10/7000 http://10.161.14.10/7000 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- setting spiral=false 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipRequest [SipProcessor[3]]- >>>>>>>>> Sending Request >>>>>>>>> INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 14 From: <sip:user1@mot.net mailto:sip:user1@mot.net>;tag=83FBA2EBC5A9EE4615D194DECA1EE955 To: <sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> Supported: 100rel Route: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;lr=on>,<sip:10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;lr=on> CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 Contact: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;transport=udp> P-AS-Hint: B2BUA Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;branch=z9hG4bK2137041384 Content-Length: 337
Thanks in advance
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
This is not happening when the request is redirected to wesip, using:
route[1] { if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ t_reply("500","Application Server error"); } }
The request printed in the wesip debug logs have the route.
But if I don't redirect the request to wesip and use the following:
route[2] { xlog ("L_INFO", "$rm: cseq:$cs $ru: RELAYING (PROXY) to $du (flags: $mF) ...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit;
}
I see that openser removes the top most Route header.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
On 4/27/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla daniel@voice-system.ro wrote:
Hello,
openser via loose_route() will remove top most Route header if it is added by the proxy (matches local IP addresses and aliases).
Cheers, Daniel
On 04/27/07 15:54, Jose Antonio Garvayo wrote:
Hi,
I have testing openser 1.2.0 with seas module and wesip.
If I send an INVITE message with a Route header, the SIP servlet receives the INVITE with the full Route Header, and when I proxy it the Route is the same, but I expected that the top most Route header has been removed. Who is in charge to do it? openser or wesip? I first thought it might be openser through loose_route(), but it seems not to be the case.
The openser cfg file is similar to the example given in wesip tutorial:
route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); exit; };
xlog("L_INFO", "$rm: ci=$ci ft=$ft tt=$tt cseq=$cs ruri:$ru
received from: $si:$sp \n");
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); if (loose_route()) { xlog("L_INFO", "RR enforced\n"); append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); }; if (uri==myself) { xlog("L_INFO", "uri == myself"); if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); exit; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { xlog("L_INFO", "outbound alias\n"); append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; }; xlog("L_INFO", "usrloc applied\n"); append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); }; route(1);
}
route[1] { if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ t_reply("500","Application Server error"); } }
route[2] { xlog ("L_INFO", "$rm: cseq:$cs $ru: RELAYING (PROXY) to $du (flags: $mF) ...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit;
}
This the log from wesip:
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasMessageEvent [SeasRouter]- New message received, from 10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025 to 10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000 over UDP 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasTransactionEvent [SeasRouter]- hash_index = 60870,label=1842040723 flags=0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- peerAddress = 10.161.14.10/6025 http://10.161.14.10/6025 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- About to process INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipConnector [ExpressMChannel[76]]- createProcessor: Reusing existing processor 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO SipProcessor [ExpressMChannel[76]]- An incoming message is being assigned 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- Done processing INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- <<<<<<<<< Request Received <<<<<<<<< INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;branch=z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 Contact: <sip:10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025 ;transport=UDP Max-Forwards: 14 From: <sip:user1@mot.net mailto:sip:user1@mot.net>;tag=6661 To: <sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> Supported: 100rel Route: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;lr=on>,<sip:10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;lr=on> Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 337
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasHashTable [SipProcessor[3]]- Inserting hashIdx:60870 label:1842040723 into hashTable 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- Transaction [ z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101] is new Transaction?? -->
true
14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG EngineSipMapper [SipProcessor[3]]- Request from 10.161.14.10 http://10.161.14.10 mapped to: ConvergedEngine[Standalone].StandardHttpHost[localhost] 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedEngineValve [SipProcessor[3]]- Invoking Host:localhost 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHostValve [SipProcessor[3]]- SipSession not found for requestINVITE, trying match against Rules 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHost [SipProcessor[3]]- Mapped request to:/sampleservlet 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedContextValve [SipProcessor[3]]- new session created : 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- Creating Express message channel 10.161.14.10/7000 http://10.161.14.10/7000 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- setting spiral=false 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipRequest [SipProcessor[3]]- >>>>>>>>> Sending Request >>>>>>>>> INVITE sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 14 From: <sip:user1@mot.net mailto:sip:user1@mot.net>;tag=83FBA2EBC5A9EE4615D194DECA1EE955 To: <sip:user2@mot.net mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> Supported: 100rel Route: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;lr=on>,<sip:10.161.14.10:6025 http://10.161.14.10:6025;lr=on> CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 Contact: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000 ;transport=udp P-AS-Hint: B2BUA Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:7000 http://10.161.14.10:7000;branch=z9hG4bK2137041384 Content-Length: 337
Thanks in advance
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
everything you see is right. WeSIP get the messages as was receved by openser, while after t_relay() you see it as the one sent by openser (with route header removed). Communication between openser and wesip is not SIP, it is a custom protocol.
Cheers, Daniel
On 04/29/07 21:41, Jose Antonio Garvayo wrote:
Hello,
This is not happening when the request is redirected to wesip, using:
route[1] { if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ t_reply("500","Application Server error"); } }
The request printed in the wesip debug logs have the route.
But if I don't redirect the request to wesip and use the following:
route[2] { xlog ("L_INFO", "$rm: cseq:$cs $ru: RELAYING (PROXY) to $du (flags: $mF) ...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit;
}
I see that openser removes the top most Route header.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
On 4/27/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <daniel@voice-system.ro mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hello, openser via loose_route() will remove top most Route header if it is added by the proxy (matches local IP addresses and aliases). Cheers, Daniel On 04/27/07 15:54, Jose Antonio Garvayo wrote: > Hi, > > I have testing openser 1.2.0 with seas module and wesip. > > If I send an INVITE message with a Route header, the SIP servlet > receives the INVITE with the full Route Header, and when I proxy it > the Route is the same, but I expected that the top most Route header > has been removed. Who is in charge to do it? openser or wesip? I first > thought it might be openser through loose_route(), but it seems not to > be the case. > > The openser cfg file is similar to the example given in wesip tutorial: > > route{ > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); > exit; > }; > if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { > sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); > exit; > }; > > xlog("L_INFO", "$rm: ci=$ci ft=$ft tt=$tt cseq=$cs ruri:$ru > received from: $si:$sp \n"); > > if (!method=="REGISTER") > record_route(); > > if (loose_route()) { > xlog("L_INFO", "RR enforced\n"); > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); > route(1); > }; > > if (uri==myself) { > xlog("L_INFO", "uri == myself"); > if (method=="REGISTER") { > save("location"); > exit; > }; > lookup("aliases"); > if (!uri==myself) { > xlog("L_INFO", "outbound alias\n"); > append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); > route(1); > }; > if (!lookup("location")) { > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); > exit; > }; > xlog("L_INFO", "usrloc applied\n"); > append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); > }; > route(1); > } > > route[1] { > if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ > t_reply("500","Application Server error"); > } > } > > route[2] { > xlog ("L_INFO", "$rm: cseq:$cs $ru: RELAYING (PROXY) to $du > (flags: $mF) ...\n"); > if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > }; > exit; > > } > > This the log from wesip: > > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasMessageEvent [SeasRouter]- New message > received, from 10.161.14.10:6025 <http://10.161.14.10:6025> <http://10.161.14.10:6025> to > 10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000> <http://10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000>> over UDP > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasTransactionEvent [SeasRouter]- > hash_index = 60870,label=1842040723 flags=0 > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- > peerAddress = 10.161.14.10/6025 <http://10.161.14.10/6025> <http://10.161.14.10/6025> > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- > About to process INVITE sip:user2@mot.net <mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user2@mot.net <mailto:user2@mot.net>> > SIP/2.0 > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipConnector [ExpressMChannel[76]]- > createProcessor: Reusing existing processor > 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO SipProcessor [ExpressMChannel[76]]- An > incoming message is being assigned > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[76]]- > Done processing INVITE sip:user2@mot.net <mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user2@mot.net <mailto:user2@mot.net>> > SIP/2.0 > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- <<<<<<<<< > Request Received <<<<<<<<< > INVITE sip:user2@mot.net <mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user2@mot.net <mailto:user2@mot.net> > SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:6025 <http://10.161.14.10:6025> > <http://10.161.14.10:6025>;branch= z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 <mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101> > <mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 <mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101>> > Contact: <sip:10.161.14.10:6025 <http://10.161.14.10:6025> <http://10.161.14.10:6025>;transport=UDP> > Max-Forwards: 14 > From: <sip:user1@mot.net <mailto:sip:user1@mot.net> <mailto: sip <mailto:sip>:user1@mot.net <mailto:user1@mot.net>>>;tag=6661 > To: <sip:user2@mot.net <mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user2@mot.net <mailto:user2@mot.net>>> > Supported: 100rel > Route: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000> > <http://10.161.14.10:7000>;lr=on>,<sip: 10.161.14.10:6025 <http://10.161.14.10:6025> > <http://10.161.14.10:6025>;lr=on> > Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10> <mailto: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10>> > CSeq: 1 INVITE > Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 337 > > > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SeasHashTable [SipProcessor[3]]- Inserting > hashIdx:60870 label:1842040723 into hashTable > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipProcessor [SipProcessor[3]]- Transaction > [ z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 <mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101> > <mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101 <mailto:z9hG4bK1-13972359389@10.161.14.101>>] is new Transaction?? --> true > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG EngineSipMapper [SipProcessor[3]]- Request > from 10.161.14.10 <http://10.161.14.10> <http://10.161.14.10> mapped to: > ConvergedEngine[Standalone].StandardHttpHost[localhost] > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedEngineValve [SipProcessor[3]]- > Invoking Host:localhost > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHostValve [SipProcessor[3]]- > SipSession not found for requestINVITE, trying match against Rules > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedHost [SipProcessor[3]]- Mapped > request to:/sampleservlet > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ConvergedContextValve [SipProcessor[3]]- new > session created : 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10> > <mailto: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10>> > 14:43:37 27abr2007 INFO ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- > Creating Express message channel 10.161.14.10/7000 <http://10.161.14.10/7000> > <http://10.161.14.10/7000> > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[3]]- > setting spiral=false > 14:43:37 27abr2007 DEBUG SipRequest [SipProcessor[3]]- >>>>>>>>> > Sending Request >>>>>>>>> > INVITE sip:user2@mot.net <mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user2@mot.net <mailto:user2@mot.net> > SIP/2.0 > Max-Forwards: 14 > From: <sip:user1@mot.net <mailto:sip:user1@mot.net> > <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user1@mot.net <mailto:user1@mot.net>>>;tag=83FBA2EBC5A9EE4615D194DECA1EE955 > To: <sip:user2@mot.net <mailto:sip:user2@mot.net> <mailto:sip <mailto:sip>:user2@mot.net <mailto:user2@mot.net>>> > Supported: 100rel > Route: <sip: 10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000> > <http://10.161.14.10:7000>;lr=on>,<sip:10.161.14.10:6025 <http://10.161.14.10:6025> > < http://10.161.14.10:6025>;lr=on> > CSeq: 1 INVITE > Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,UPDATE,MESSAGE,PRACK,REFER > Content-Type: application/sdp > Call-ID: 1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10> <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10 <mailto:1-13972359389@10.161.14.10>> > Contact: <sip:10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000> < http://10.161.14.10:7000>;transport=udp> > P-AS-Hint: B2BUA > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000> > <http://10.161.14.10:7000 <http://10.161.14.10:7000>>;branch=z9hG4bK2137041384 > Content-Length: 337 > > > > > Thanks in advance > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >