Paul. Hello. Sorry to interrupt you. I'm still stuck with the mediaproxy resource problem. I've installed the patch from the pyhton.org but the problem seems to persist. I'm thinking maybe the problem is related with the way i treat a NAT'd call. I hope that you can help me with some questions. I have a mix NAT'd solution, the mayority of my endpoint have STUN enabled, so if this first solution fails, the mediaproxy is enabled for those calls. Regarding to the mediaproxy : What i do is to check if the caller is NAT'd if so, the mediaproxy is enabled. When a endpoint with a public ip call to a NAT'd endpoint i do the same check but in the on_reply_route. Is this ok?. How you handle a call when a endpoint in the public internet call to another in the public internet too? Do you use mediaproxy in that case?. I'm attaching my ser.cfg to check if there is any problem with it.
I really appreciate any help
Regards, Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Miércoles, 16 de Marzo de 2005 10:22 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
That's what I have. I'm not sure what the setflag(1) is for, but then again, I cannot see the entire ser.cfg.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:20:41 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Hello Paul. I have the next lines for ending media session:
if (loose_route()) { if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; t_relay(); break; };
Is this ok?. I got the idea from a ser.cfg file in the
forum. I'm not so
sure if this is correct. Can someone help me here?
Thanks again!
Regards, Ricardo
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Martes, 15 de Marzo de 2005 21:03 Para: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
Yes that could help, but if you're experiencing pleny of
"idle" RTP
connections then you are probably not ending your media
sessions with
end_media_session().
Regards, Paul
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:33:19 -0600, Alberto Cruz acruz@tekbrain.com wrote:
If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may be this
could help you:
http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new
mediaproxy version.
1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a
increasing amount of
RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's
happening. Is this
something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session,
i'm still confuse
with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the
cause of the
increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way
to debug the
mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's
going on? Any
help would be appreciated. Thanks Ricardo.- -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx
[mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para:
Ricardo Martinez CC:
serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy
consuming RAM
resources. I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you
showed in your
first email. So AFAIK, that is OK. Regards, Paul On
Fri, 11 Mar 2005
16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote: Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem.
What about the
tear down of the sessions? Thanks! Regards, Ricardo.- -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx
[mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para:
Ricardo Martinez CC:
serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy
consuming RAM
resources. Ricardo, I think the release notes on
mediaproxy-1.2 say that
some resource leaks have been fixed. Perhaps you can
try version 1.2
Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400,
Ricardo Martinez
rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote: Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER
sip-proxy with the
mediaproxy running. Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is
increasing. It seems like
for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources
used in RAM. You
can look this in the next lines : PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS
SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4 19:22 0 mediaproxy.py Can someone tell me if this is a bug of
mediaproxy or maybe a
missconfiguration in my ser.cfg? I want to ask a question
regarding to tear
down sessions with mediaproxy also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if
(method=="BYE" ||
method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido -->
terminando la
sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); };
t_relay(); break;
}; Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to
determine which
ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You
can see for example
this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to
be active even
before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination
IP's in the output
of the session.py) Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
--- hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k
inactive 0'02"
Unknown Audio 0/0/0 Can someone tell me what's happening?
I'm runnig : [root
mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0
Thanks in advance.
Regards, Ricardo M.
_______________________________________________ Serusers
mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers
mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Ricardo Martinez