26 Sep
2005
26 Sep
'05
5:03 p.m.
Hey All,
I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting
core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a
progressive memory leak.
So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks
ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS
head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
Thanks,
Darren Nay
26 Sep
26 Sep
5:37 p.m.
Darren,
If you're using SER with paying customers (or at least important
customers) then I'd recommend using the SER-0.9.x stable branch.
The primary reason is that the CVS HEAD is unstable and likely has
undiscovered bugs.
Regards,
Paul
On 9/26/05, Darren Nay <dnay(a)ionosphere.net> wrote:
Hey All,
I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting
core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a
progressive memory leak.
So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks
ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS
head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
Thanks,
Darren Nay
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:04 p.m.
Sorry, I didn't explain well enough.
I am using the SER 0.9.x stable branch. " cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router"
but it's version 0.9.5-pre1 .. However, on the website there is version
0.9.4 in a tarball for download.
Is 0.9.5-pre1 stable, or should I use the 0.9.4 downloadable tarball?
Darren
On 9/26/05 10:37 AM, "Paul Hazlett" <javarockx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Darren,
If you're using SER with paying customers (or at least important
customers) then I'd recommend using the SER-0.9.x stable branch.
The primary reason is that the CVS HEAD is unstable and likely has
undiscovered bugs.
Regards,
Paul
On 9/26/05, Darren Nay <dnay(a)ionosphere.net> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting
> core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a
> progressive memory leak.
>
> So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks
> ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS
> head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
>
> So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
>
> Thanks,
> Darren Nay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
27 Sep
27 Sep
1:58 p.m.
You should use 0.9.4 from the tarball. 0.9.5-pre1 will be released as
0.9.5 once we fix some remaining bugs.
Jan.
On 26-09-2005 11:04, Darren Nay wrote:
Sorry, I didn't explain well enough.
I am using the SER 0.9.x stable branch. " cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router"
but it's version 0.9.5-pre1 .. However, on the website there is version
0.9.4 in a tarball for download.
Is 0.9.5-pre1 stable, or should I use the 0.9.4 downloadable tarball?
Darren
On 9/26/05 10:37 AM, "Paul Hazlett" <javarockx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Darren,
If you're using SER with paying customers (or at least important
customers) then I'd recommend using the SER-0.9.x stable branch.
The primary reason is that the CVS HEAD is unstable and likely has
undiscovered bugs.
Regards,
Paul
On 9/26/05, Darren Nay <dnay(a)ionosphere.net> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting
> core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a
> progressive memory leak.
>
> So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks
> ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS
> head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
>
> So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
>
> Thanks,
> Darren Nay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7002
days inactive
7003
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Darren Nay -
Jan Janak -
Paul Hazlett