7 Oct
2015
7 Oct
'15
8 p.m.
On 07.10.2015 16:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
in the event route for uac_req_send() is practically during handling the
reply for what was sent before. Also, the uac_req_send() sends something
out of the processed sip message, so typically functions won't work
because they will be applied to the processed sip message.
Maybe try setting the avp with the timeout value (see tm parameters),
might work, I haven't checked -- report the results, would be good to know.
Unfortunately solution with fr_timer_avp also doesn't work. Only set
globally fr_timer works. Well... there is always a solution. Thanks anyway.
Cheers,
Daniel
Regards,
Paweł
7 Oct
7 Oct
8:56 p.m.
New subject: uac_req_send and reply timeout
On 07/10/15 19:00, Paweł Sternal wrote:
On 07.10.2015 16:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
OK, good to know using avps makes no difference. If you need different
timeout interval for the nomal transactions, then you can use a function
for them and let the fr_timer for the ones by uac_req_send().
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
Hello,
in the event route for uac_req_send() is practically during handling the
reply for what was sent before. Also, the uac_req_send() sends something
out of the processed sip message, so typically functions won't work
because they will be applied to the processed sip message.
Maybe try setting the avp with the timeout value (see tm parameters),
might work, I haven't checked -- report the results, would be good to
know.
Unfortunately solution with fr_timer_avp also doesn't work. Only set
globally fr_timer works. Well... there is always a solution. Thanks
anyway.
3363
days inactive
3363
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Paweł Sternal