30 Jan
2007
30 Jan
'07
4:01 p.m.
I'm testing the presence module on 0.10.99-dev in CVS.
When using the newest X-lite client I am getting the following error
messages in /var/log/messages
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30891]: INFO: rls_mod.c:155: reading RLS data from
database
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30879]: INFO: subscribe.c:286: Unsupported event package
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30879]: ERROR: subscribe.c:590: Error while checking
message
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30879]: INFO: subscribe.c:603: handle_subscription
about to send_reply and return -2
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC
support (0, 256)
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: WARN: rl_subscription.c:398: destroying
subscription from callback due to 420 response on NOTIFY
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: TRACE: rl_subscription.c:400: RLS:
subscription destroyed!!!
In X-lite I get this error message:
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Match!" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Send to TU: TU:
DialogUsageManager size=0 NOTIFY sip:tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.112.135.70;branch=z9hG4bK7ed6.d015cec1.0
Max-Forwards: 70
Require: eventlist
Contact: <sip:85.112.135.70:5060>
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=d204727a
From: <sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-1a1f
Call-ID: OTYwMDE1NmQ5MDQwYjFmMTBlZjQ0NTNhZTExNWM4MGM.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type=""application/rlmi+xml"";start=""qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142"";boundary=""RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541"";
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux))
Subscription-State: active;expires=300
Event: presence
Content-Length: 338
--RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset=""UTF-8""
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<list xmlns=""urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi""
uri=""sip:tuser@test-domain.com"" version=""0""
fullState=""true"">
</list>
--RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541--
" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP | "SipMessage::getContents:
multipart/related" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Decrypted message:02815028
" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Got: SipReq: NOTIFY
tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=85.112.135.70:5060 / 10 from(wire)" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Received an unsupported
option tag(s): SipReq: NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.35:34492
tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY contact=85.112.135.70:5060 / 10
from(wire)" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP | "Helper::makeResponse(SipReq:
NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=85.112.135.70:5060 / 10 from(wire) code=420 reason=" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP | "SEND: SipResp: 420
tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY / 10 from(tu)" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.527 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Failed required options
validation NOTIFY sip:tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.112.135.70;branch=z9hG4bK7ed6.d015cec1.0
Max-Forwards: 70
Require: eventlist
Contact: <sip:85.112.135.70:5060>
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=d204727a
From: <sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-1a1f
Call-ID: OTYwMDE1NmQ5MDQwYjFmMTBlZjQ0NTNhZTExNWM4MGM.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type=""application/rlmi+xml"";boundary=""RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541"";start=""qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142""
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux))
Subscription-State: active;expires=300
Event: presence
Content-Length: 334
--RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset=""UTF-8""
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Id: qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<list xmlns=""urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi""
uri=""sip:tuser@test-domain.com"" version=""0""
fullState=""true"">
</list>
-
Does any know know how to solve this problem?
Is there any other clients that works well with the ser presence module?
Kind regards,
Jens-Martin Groenne
30 Jan
30 Jan
4:13 p.m.
According to messages it seems to me, that your client is not able to
handle "list NOTIFY". Such notifications are sent from RLS module, if a
client subscribes to a resource-list URI not to a "simple URI".
This problem could cause that RLS was implemented according to an older
draft version or because client simply doesn't support list
notifications.
Is it working with non-list notifications? I.e. try to subscribe to an
existing user (for example to sip:tuser@test-domain.com) and see if
everything is ok.
Vaclav
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:01:09PM +0100, Jens-Martin Groenne wrote:
I'm testing the presence module on 0.10.99-dev in
CVS.
When using the newest X-lite client I am getting the following error
messages in /var/log/messages
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30891]: INFO: rls_mod.c:155: reading RLS data from
database
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30879]: INFO: subscribe.c:286: Unsupported event package
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30879]: ERROR: subscribe.c:590: Error while checking
message
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30879]: INFO: subscribe.c:603: handle_subscription
about to send_reply and return -2
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC
support (0, 256)
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: WARN: rl_subscription.c:398: destroying
subscription from callback due to 420 response on NOTIFY
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: TRACE: rl_subscription.c:400: RLS:
subscription destroyed!!!
In X-lite I get this error message:
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Match!" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Send to TU: TU:
DialogUsageManager size=0 NOTIFY sip:tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.112.135.70;branch=z9hG4bK7ed6.d015cec1.0
Max-Forwards: 70
Require: eventlist
Contact: <sip:85.112.135.70:5060>
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=d204727a
From: <sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-1a1f
Call-ID: OTYwMDE1NmQ5MDQwYjFmMTBlZjQ0NTNhZTExNWM4MGM.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type=""application/rlmi+xml"";start=""qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142"";boundary=""RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541"";
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux))
Subscription-State: active;expires=300
Event: presence
Content-Length: 338
--RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset=""UTF-8""
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<list xmlns=""urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi""
uri=""sip:tuser@test-domain.com"" version=""0""
fullState=""true"">
</list>
--RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541--
" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP | "SipMessage::getContents:
multipart/related" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Decrypted message:02815028
" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Got: SipReq: NOTIFY
tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=85.112.135.70:5060 / 10 from(wire)" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Received an unsupported
option tag(s): SipReq: NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.35:34492
tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY contact=85.112.135.70:5060 / 10
from(wire)" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP | "Helper::makeResponse(SipReq:
NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=85.112.135.70:5060 / 10 from(wire) code=420 reason=" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.526 | Debug | RESIP | "SEND: SipResp: 420
tid=7ed6.d015cec1.0 cseq=NOTIFY / 10 from(tu)" |
[07-01-30]15:44:45.527 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Failed required options
validation NOTIFY sip:tuser@192.168.1.35:34492 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.112.135.70;branch=z9hG4bK7ed6.d015cec1.0
Max-Forwards: 70
Require: eventlist
Contact: <sip:85.112.135.70:5060>
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=d204727a
From: <sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-1a1f
Call-ID: OTYwMDE1NmQ5MDQwYjFmMTBlZjQ0NTNhZTExNWM4MGM.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type=""application/rlmi+xml"";boundary=""RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541"";start=""qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142""
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux))
Subscription-State: active;expires=300
Event: presence
Content-Length: 334
--RewXdpxR741013657xA447338541
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset=""UTF-8""
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Id: qwW1099041416pPdxX1162343142
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<list xmlns=""urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi""
uri=""sip:tuser@test-domain.com"" version=""0""
fullState=""true"">
</list>
-
Does any know know how to solve this problem?
Is there any other clients that works well with the ser presence module?
Kind regards,
Jens-Martin Groenne
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
31 Jan
31 Jan
12:07 p.m.
Vaclav Kubart wrote:
According to messages it seems to me, that your client
is not able to
handle "list NOTIFY". Such notifications are sent from RLS module, if a
client subscribes to a resource-list URI not to a "simple URI".
This problem could cause that RLS was implemented according to an older
draft version or because client simply doesn't support list
notifications.
Is it working with non-list notifications? I.e. try to subscribe to an
existing user (for example to sip:tuser@test-domain.com) and see if
everything is ok.
Vaclav
Do you know any clients that handles list NOTIFY as they are in SER now?
When i try non-list notification I get the same error:
In /var/log/messages
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: INFO: subscribe.c:603: handle_subscription
about to send_reply and return -2
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30876]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC
support (0, 256)
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30876]: WARN: rl_subscription.c:398: destroying
subscription from callback due to 420 response on NOTIFY
In X-lite debug log:
--RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469--
" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.479 | Debug | RESIP | "SipMessage::getContents:
multipart/related" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.479 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Decrypted message:0280D230
" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Got: SipReq: NOTIFY
tuser@192.168.1.71:54364 tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=192.168.1.1:5060 / 10 from(wire)" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Received an unsupported
option tag(s): SipReq: NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.71:54364
tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY contact=192.168.1.1:5060 / 10 from(wire)" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Debug | RESIP | "Helper::makeResponse(SipReq:
NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.71:54364 tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=192.168.1.1:5060 / 10 from(wire) code=420 reason=" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Debug | RESIP | "SEND: SipResp: 420
tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY / 10 from(tu)" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Failed required options
validation NOTIFY sip:tuser@192.168.1.71:54364 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.1;branch=z9hG4bKd50c.16d08897.0
Max-Forwards: 70
Require: eventlist
Contact: <sip:192.168.1.1:5060>
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=5d062f5d
From: <sip:tuser2@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-db3a
Call-ID: OTk2MjgzNjNiYTUzMzFiNDIxMjRlNzE2MDRhZTBhMzI.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type=""application/rlmi+xml"";boundary=""RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469"";start=""qwW388818348pPdxX2033088910""
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux))
Subscription-State: active;expires=300
Event: presence
Content-Length: 336
--RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset=""UTF-8""
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Id: qwW388818348pPdxX2033088910
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<list xmlns=""urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi""
uri=""sip:tuser2@test-domain.com"" version=""0""
fullState=""true"">
</list>
--RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469--" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.581 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Adding timer:
Timer J tid=d50c.16d08897.0 ms=32000" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.581 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSPORT | "Looked up source for
destination: [ V4 192.168.1.1:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified
received on: Transport: [ V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target domain=unspecified
connectionId=0 ] connectionId=0 ] -> [ V4 192.168.1.71:0 UDP target
domain=unspecified received on: Transport: [ V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target
domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ] connectionId=0 ] sent-by=192.168.1.1
sent-port=0" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.581 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSPORT | "Transmitting to [ V4
192.168.1.1:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified received on: Transport: [
V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]
connectionId=0 ] tlsDomain= via [ V4 192.168.1.71:54364 UDP target
domain=unspecified received on: Transport: [ V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target
domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ] connectionId=0 ]SIP/2.0 420 Bad
Extension
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.1;branch=z9hG4bKd50c.16d08897.0
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=5d062f5d
From: <sip:tuser2@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-db3a
Call-ID: OTk2MjgzNjNiYTUzMzFiNDIxMjRlNzE2MDRhZTBhMzI.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Unsupported: eventlist
Content-Length: 0
Kind regards,
Jens-Martin Groenne
1:36 p.m.
Jens-Martin Groenne wrote:
I'm testing the presence module on 0.10.99-dev in
CVS.
When using the newest X-lite client I am getting the following error
messages in /var/log/messages
It seems X-lite (xten) has some problem with their
presence implementation.
When I use Gaim presence works somewhat better, but not perfect, I get
online / offline status from the presence server, but it does not handle
changes in status on users in the buddy list.
If anyone knows of other good presence / SIMPLE clients please let me know!
Kind regards,
Jens-Martin Groenne
1 Feb
1 Feb
2:36 p.m.
It is still list notification. Could you send me dump of SUBSCRIBE
request which was sent from XLite?
Vaclav
Do you know any clients that handles list NOTIFY as
they are in SER now?
When i try non-list notification I get the same error:
In /var/log/messages
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30885]: INFO: subscribe.c:603: handle_subscription
about to send_reply and return -2
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30876]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC
support (0, 256)
/usr/local/sbin/ser[30876]: WARN: rl_subscription.c:398: destroying
subscription from callback due to 420 response on NOTIFY
In X-lite debug log:
--RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469--
" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.479 | Debug | RESIP | "SipMessage::getContents:
multipart/related" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.479 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Decrypted message:0280D230
" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Got: SipReq: NOTIFY
tuser@192.168.1.71:54364 tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=192.168.1.1:5060 / 10 from(wire)" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Info | RESIP:DUM | "Received an unsupported
option tag(s): SipReq: NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.71:54364
tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY contact=192.168.1.1:5060 / 10 from(wire)" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Debug | RESIP | "Helper::makeResponse(SipReq:
NOTIFY tuser@192.168.1.71:54364 tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY
contact=192.168.1.1:5060 / 10 from(wire) code=420 reason=" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Debug | RESIP | "SEND: SipResp: 420
tid=d50c.16d08897.0 cseq=NOTIFY / 10 from(tu)" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.480 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "Failed required options
validation NOTIFY sip:tuser@192.168.1.71:54364 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.1;branch=z9hG4bKd50c.16d08897.0
Max-Forwards: 70
Require: eventlist
Contact: <sip:192.168.1.1:5060>
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=5d062f5d
From: <sip:tuser2@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-db3a
Call-ID: OTk2MjgzNjNiYTUzMzFiNDIxMjRlNzE2MDRhZTBhMzI.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type=""application/rlmi+xml"";boundary=""RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469"";start=""qwW388818348pPdxX2033088910""
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux))
Subscription-State: active;expires=300
Event: presence
Content-Length: 336
--RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset=""UTF-8""
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Id: qwW388818348pPdxX2033088910
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<list xmlns=""urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi""
uri=""sip:tuser2@test-domain.com"" version=""0""
fullState=""true"">
</list>
--RewXdpxR455586034xA1690507469--" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.581 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Adding timer:
Timer J tid=d50c.16d08897.0 ms=32000" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.581 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSPORT | "Looked up source for
destination: [ V4 192.168.1.1:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified
received on: Transport: [ V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target domain=unspecified
connectionId=0 ] connectionId=0 ] -> [ V4 192.168.1.71:0 UDP target
domain=unspecified received on: Transport: [ V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target
domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ] connectionId=0 ] sent-by=192.168.1.1
sent-port=0" |
[07-01-31]11:58:09.581 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSPORT | "Transmitting to [ V4
192.168.1.1:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified received on: Transport: [
V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]
connectionId=0 ] tlsDomain= via [ V4 192.168.1.71:54364 UDP target
domain=unspecified received on: Transport: [ V4 0.0.0.0:54364 UDP target
domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ] connectionId=0 ]SIP/2.0 420 Bad
Extension
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.1;branch=z9hG4bKd50c.16d08897.0
To: ""Jens""<sip:tuser@test-domain.com>;tag=5d062f5d
From: <sip:tuser2@test-domain.com>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-db3a
Call-ID: OTk2MjgzNjNiYTUzMzFiNDIxMjRlNzE2MDRhZTBhMzI.
CSeq: 10 NOTIFY
Unsupported: eventlist
Content-Length: 0
Kind regards,
Jens-Martin Groenne
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2:40 p.m.
I used EyeBeam and an older XLite - presence was working there... Basic
presence (non-list) was working with large number of clients (kphone,
EyeBeam, Windows Messenger, XLite, pua.pl, ...)
Vaclav
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:36:37PM +0100, Jens-Martin Groenne wrote:
Jens-Martin Groenne wrote:
I'm testing the presence module on 0.10.99-dev
in CVS.
When using the newest X-lite client I am getting the following error
messages in /var/log/messages
It seems X-lite (xten) has some problem with their
presence implementation.
When I use Gaim presence works somewhat better, but not perfect, I get
online / offline status from the presence server, but it does not handle
changes in status on users in the buddy list.
If anyone knows of other good presence / SIMPLE clients please let me know!
Kind regards,
Jens-Martin Groenne
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6319
days inactive
6321
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jens-Martin Groenne -
Vaclav Kubart