Hello
I have a proxy that makes the function of balancer and I have a doubt. This balancing between two proxies that do accounting, if any falls during the course of a call, you lose accounting (record-route). Is that correct?
Is it advisable to have at each proxy server as a slave and balance the ip? Thanks
Regards
Hello,
On 2/5/12 8:31 PM, Anto wrote:
Hello
I have a proxy that makes the function of balancer and I have a doubt. This balancing between two proxies that do accounting, if any falls during the course of a call, you lose accounting (record-route). Is that correct?
Is it advisable to have at each proxy server as a slave and balance the ip? Thanks
you can use hostnames in the record route headers, see rr module readme for the functions giving such option. Then be sure you have alias values set to both proxies' hotnames.
Also, you can do static routing if the traffic comes always through your loadbalancer to the acc proxies and then to an outbound proxy -- this is a matter of your voip platform architecture.
Cheers, Daniel
Hello,
Ok ;-). Thanks !
Best regards Anto
2012/2/8 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com:
Hello,
On 2/5/12 8:31 PM, Anto wrote:
Hello
I have a proxy that makes the function of balancer and I have a doubt. This balancing between two proxies that do accounting, if any falls during the course of a call, you lose accounting (record-route). Is that correct?
Is it advisable to have at each proxy server as a slave and balance the ip? Thanks
you can use hostnames in the record route headers, see rr module readme for the functions giving such option. Then be sure you have alias values set to both proxies' hotnames.
Also, you can do static routing if the traffic comes always through your loadbalancer to the acc proxies and then to an outbound proxy -- this is a matter of your voip platform architecture.
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
-
Anto -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla