I am working on a VoLTE/IMS scenario to transfer text messages as SMS over IP (+g.3gpp.smsip feature) between UE's. This is a high-level view of the message flows between the endpoints (not showing CSCFs):
UE1 IP-SM-GW
|---- MESSAGE (SUBMIT) --------------->|
|<------------------- 202 ACCEPTED ----|
| |
|<-------- MESSAGE (SUBMIT_REPORT) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
|
UE2 |
| |
|<-------------- MESSAGE (DELIVER) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
The messages does get transferred from UE1 to UE2 successfully. Since this is GSM-style SMS, the OA (originating address) and DA (destination address) are specified using telephone numbers, not sip addresses. This is not a problem for the DA, since it is specified in the SUBMIT TPDU from the originating handset, but when the IP-SM-GW sends the DELIVER TPDU it needs to specify the OA so that the recipient knows who sent the SMS, and this was not provided in the MESSAGE with the SMS-SUBMIT.
According to 3GPP TS 24.341 (http://www.qtc.jp/3GPP/Specs/24341-b20.pdf):
"The IP-SM-GW will have to use an address of the SM-over-IP sender that the SC can process (i.e. an E.164 number). This address will come from a tel URI in a P-Asserted-Identity header (as defined in RFC 3325 [13]) placed in the SIP MESSAGE request by the P-CSCF or S-CSCF."
Looking at the MESSAGE request sent from the S-CSCF to the IP-SM-GW, it looks like neither the P-CSCF nor the S-CSCF is providing the tel address in a P-Asserted-Identity header:
MESSAGE tel:+3108012345680 SIP/2.0
Route: sip:defaultapp@tas.core.ims1.test;lr, sip:iscmark@scscf.core.ims1.test:6060;lr;s=1;h=0;d=0;a=7369703a303031303330 31323334353637383940696d732e6d6e633030332e6d63633030312e336770706e6574776f72 6b2e6f7267
P-Served-User: sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org;sescase=orig;regstat e=reg
f: sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org;tag=2703358633
CSeq: 555874977 MESSAGE
i: 2703358625_2324045032@2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:EB88:150:0:0:0:22]:6060;branch=z9hG4bKb857.bd3345ba81ec10b1d11639d 9c7414606.0;i=a
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP [2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9];branch=z9hG4bKb857.be53cc1c583b9c5f9dc ebf3306f2b7c1.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201]:8906;rport=8013;branch=z9hG4bK355262 2488
Max-Forwards: 68
P-Access-Network-Info: 3GPP-E-UTRAN-FDD; utran-cell-id-3gpp=0010300030000001
c: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Allow: MESSAGE
d: no-fork
User-Agent: Xiaomi_Redmi 3S_Android6.0.1_9
l: 27
P-Charging-Vector: icid-value=49565300000000511100004B01000000; icid-generated-at=2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9
P-Asserted-Identity: sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org
P-Visited-Network-ID: core.ims1.test
Message Body
GSM A-I/F RP - RP-DATA (MS to Network)
Message Type RP-DATA (MS to Network)
RP-Message Reference
RP-Message Reference: 0x05 (5)
RP-Originator Address
RP-Destination Address - (3108012345680)
RP-User Data
Length: 14
TPDU (not displayed)
GSM SMS TPDU (GSM 03.40) SMS-SUBMIT
0... .... = TP-RP: TP Reply Path parameter is not set in this SMS SUBMIT/DELIVER
.0.. .... = TP-UDHI: The TP UD field contains only the short message
..1. .... = TP-SRR: A status report is requested
...0 0... = TP-VPF: TP-VP field not present (0)
.... .0.. = TP-RD: Instruct SC to accept duplicates
.... ..01 = TP-MTI: SMS-SUBMIT (1)
TP-MR: 92
TP-Destination-Address - (8000)
TP-PID: 0
TP-DCS: 0
TP-User-Data-Length: (5) depends on Data-Coding-Scheme
TP-User-Data
SMS text: HELLO
Is this something that in configurable at the P-CSCF or the S-CSCF, or would it require now development?
Thanks,
Ron
Hi Ron,
You can't change it on the Proxy-CSCF, but on the HSS. According to 3GPP Specs, the first identity associated to an IMPI is the "default-identity", which is typically used by the phone and asserted by the Proxy-CSCF.
Thanks, Carsten
Am Mi., 21. Nov. 2018, 00:31 hat Ron McLeod ron.kamailio@mcleodnet.com geschrieben:
I am working on a VoLTE/IMS scenario to transfer text messages as SMS over IP (+g.3gpp.smsip feature) between UE’s. This is a high-level view of the message flows between the endpoints (not showing CSCFs):
UE1 IP-SM-GW
|---- MESSAGE (SUBMIT) --------------->|
|<------------------- 202 ACCEPTED ----|
| |
|<-------- MESSAGE (SUBMIT_REPORT) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
|
UE2 |
| |
|<-------------- MESSAGE (DELIVER) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
The messages does get transferred from UE1 to UE2 successfully. Since this is GSM-style SMS, the OA (originating address) and DA (destination address) are specified using telephone numbers, not sip addresses. This is not a problem for the DA, since it is specified in the SUBMIT TPDU from the originating handset, but when the IP-SM-GW sends the DELIVER TPDU it needs to specify the OA so that the recipient knows who sent the SMS, and this was not provided in the MESSAGE with the SMS-SUBMIT.
According to 3GPP TS 24.341 (http://www.qtc.jp/3GPP/Specs/24341-b20.pdf):
"The IP-SM-GW will have to use an address of the SM-over-IP sender that the SC can process (i.e. an E.164 number). This address will come from a tel URI in a P-Asserted-Identity header (as defined in RFC 3325 [13]) placed in the SIP MESSAGE request by the P-CSCF or S-CSCF."
Looking at the MESSAGE request sent from the S-CSCF to the IP-SM-GW, it looks like neither the P-CSCF nor the S-CSCF is providing the tel address in a P-Asserted-Identity header:
MESSAGE tel:+3108012345680 SIP/2.0
Route: sip:defaultapp@tas.core.ims1.test;lr, sip:iscmark@scscf.core.ims1.test :6060;lr;s=1;h=0;d=0;a=7369703a30303130333031323334353637383940696d732e6d6e633030332e6d63633030312e336770706e6574776f726b2e6f7267
P-Served-User: <sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org
;sescase=orig;regstate=reg
f: sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org;tag=2703358633
CSeq: 555874977 MESSAGE
i: 2703358625_2324045032@2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:EB88:150:0:0:0:22]:6060;branch=z9hG4bKb857.bd3345ba81ec10b1d11639d9c7414606.0;i=a
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP [2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9];branch=z9hG4bKb857.be53cc1c583b9c5f9dcebf3306f2b7c1.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201]:8906;rport=8013;branch=z9hG4bK3552622488
Max-Forwards: 68
P-Access-Network-Info: 3GPP-E-UTRAN-FDD; utran-cell-id-3gpp=0010300030000001
c: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Allow: MESSAGE
d: no-fork
User-Agent: Xiaomi_Redmi 3S_Android6.0.1_9
l: 27
P-Charging-Vector: icid-value=49565300000000511100004B01000000; icid-generated-at=2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9
P-Asserted-Identity: < sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
P-Visited-Network-ID: core.ims1.test
Message Body
GSM A-I/F RP - RP-DATA (MS to Network) Message Type RP-DATA (MS to Network) RP-Message Reference RP-Message Reference: 0x05 (5) RP-Originator Address RP-Destination Address - (3108012345680) RP-User Data Length: 14 TPDU (not displayed) GSM SMS TPDU (GSM 03.40) SMS-SUBMIT 0... .... = TP-RP: TP Reply Path parameter is not set in this
SMS SUBMIT/DELIVER
.0.. .... = TP-UDHI: The TP UD field contains only the short
message
..1. .... = TP-SRR: A status report is requested ...0 0... = TP-VPF: TP-VP field not present (0) .... .0.. = TP-RD: Instruct SC to accept duplicates .... ..01 = TP-MTI: SMS-SUBMIT (1) TP-MR: 92 TP-Destination-Address - (8000) TP-PID: 0 TP-DCS: 0 TP-User-Data-Length: (5) depends on Data-Coding-Scheme TP-User-Data SMS text: HELLO
Is this something that in configurable at the P-CSCF or the S-CSCF, or would it require now development?
Thanks,
Ron
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Carsten – thanks for the reply.
I am not trying to change it – the tel identity (and other public identities) is already defined in the profile stored in the HSS; I want the S-CSCF to insert P-Preferred-Identity headers for the IMPU’s associated with the UE, which it already knows since it downloaded the profile directly from the HSS.
The P-CSCF and the handset itself may know these public identities as well if it would have SUBSCRIBEd for registration events from the S-CSCF, but in practice, I do not see the handset providing anything other than the IMPI, and the Kamailio-based P-CSCF with my current configuration does not insert any P-Asserted-Identity headers.
TS 24.341 does suggest that either the P-CSCF or the S-CSCF could insert the header(s), and in the examples provided in Annex B.5 of the same document show the additional P-Asserted-Identity header being added by the S-CSCF before forwarding the request to the IP-SM-GW:
UE to P-CSCF
MESSAGE sip:sc.home1.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [5555::aaa:bbb:ccc:ddd]:1357;comp=sigcomp; branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: sip:pcscf1.visited1.net:7531;lr;comp=sigcomp, sip:orig@scscf1.home1.net;lr
P-Preferred-Identity: "John Doe" sip:user1_public1@home1.net
From: sip:user1_public1@home1.net; tag=171828
Call-ID: cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333
Cseq: 666 MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Content-Length: (...)
P-CSCF to S-CSCF
MESSAGE sip:sc.home1.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pcscf1.visited1.net;branch=z9hG4bK240f341, SIP/2.0/UDP
[5555::aaa:bbb:ccc:ddd]:1357;comp=sigcomp; branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 69
Route: sip:orig@scscf1.home1.net;lr
P-Asserted-Identity: "John Doe" sip:user1_public1@home1.net
From: sip:user1_public1@home1.net; tag=171828
To: sip:sc.home1.net
Call-ID: cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333
Cseq: 666 MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Content-Length: (...)
S-CSCF to IP-SM-GW
MESSAGE sip:sc.home1.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP scscf1.home1.net;branch=z9hG4bK344a651, SIP/2.0/UDP
pcscf1.visited1.net;branch=z9hG4bK240f341, SIP/2.0/UDP
[5555::aaa:bbb:ccc:ddd]:1357;comp=sigcomp; branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 68
Route: sip:ipsmgw.home1.net;lr, sip:cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333@scscf1.home1.net;lr
P-Asserted-Identity: "John Doe" sip:user1_public1@home1.net
P-Asserted-Identity: tel:+12125551111
From: sip:user1_public1@home1.net; tag=171828
To: sip:sc.home1.net
Call-ID: cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333
Cseq: 666 MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Content-Length: (...)
Ron
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bock Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:35 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] IMS: SMS over IP - how to get the originator's tel address?
Hi Ron,
You can't change it on the Proxy-CSCF, but on the HSS. According to 3GPP Specs, the first identity associated to an IMPI is the "default-identity", which is typically used by the phone and asserted by the Proxy-CSCF.
Thanks,
Carsten
Am Mi., 21. Nov. 2018, 00:31 hat Ron McLeod ron.kamailio@mcleodnet.com geschrieben:
I am working on a VoLTE/IMS scenario to transfer text messages as SMS over IP (+g.3gpp.smsip feature) between UE’s. This is a high-level view of the message flows between the endpoints (not showing CSCFs):
UE1 IP-SM-GW
|---- MESSAGE (SUBMIT) --------------->|
|<------------------- 202 ACCEPTED ----|
| |
|<-------- MESSAGE (SUBMIT_REPORT) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
|
UE2 |
| |
|<-------------- MESSAGE (DELIVER) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
The messages does get transferred from UE1 to UE2 successfully. Since this is GSM-style SMS, the OA (originating address) and DA (destination address) are specified using telephone numbers, not sip addresses. This is not a problem for the DA, since it is specified in the SUBMIT TPDU from the originating handset, but when the IP-SM-GW sends the DELIVER TPDU it needs to specify the OA so that the recipient knows who sent the SMS, and this was not provided in the MESSAGE with the SMS-SUBMIT.
According to 3GPP TS 24.341 (http://www.qtc.jp/3GPP/Specs/24341-b20.pdf):
"The IP-SM-GW will have to use an address of the SM-over-IP sender that the SC can process (i.e. an E.164 number). This address will come from a tel URI in a P-Asserted-Identity header (as defined in RFC 3325 [13]) placed in the SIP MESSAGE request by the P-CSCF or S-CSCF."
Looking at the MESSAGE request sent from the S-CSCF to the IP-SM-GW, it looks like neither the P-CSCF nor the S-CSCF is providing the tel address in a P-Asserted-Identity header:
MESSAGE tel:+3108012345680 SIP/2.0
Route: sip:defaultapp@tas.core.ims1.test;lr, sip:iscmark@scscf.core.ims1.test:6060;lr;s=1;h=0;d=0;a=7369703a30303130333031323334353637383940696d732e6d6e633030332e6d63633030312e336770706e6574776f726b2e6f7267
P-Served-User: <sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org mailto:sip%3A001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org >;sescase=orig;regstate=reg
f: <sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org mailto:sip%3A001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org >;tag=2703358633
CSeq: 555874977 MESSAGE
i: 2703358625_2324045032@2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:EB88:150:0:0:0:22]:6060;branch=z9hG4bKb857.bd3345ba81ec10b1d11639d9c7414606.0;i=a
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP [2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9];branch=z9hG4bKb857.be53cc1c583b9c5f9dcebf3306f2b7c1.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201]:8906;rport=8013;branch=z9hG4bK3552622488
Max-Forwards: 68
P-Access-Network-Info: 3GPP-E-UTRAN-FDD; utran-cell-id-3gpp=0010300030000001
c: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Allow: MESSAGE
d: no-fork
User-Agent: Xiaomi_Redmi 3S_Android6.0.1_9
l: 27
P-Charging-Vector: icid-value=49565300000000511100004B01000000; icid-generated-at=2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9
P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org mailto:sip%3A001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org >
P-Visited-Network-ID: core.ims1.test
Message Body
GSM A-I/F RP - RP-DATA (MS to Network)
Message Type RP-DATA (MS to Network)
RP-Message Reference
RP-Message Reference: 0x05 (5)
RP-Originator Address
RP-Destination Address - (3108012345680)
RP-User Data
Length: 14
TPDU (not displayed)
GSM SMS TPDU (GSM 03.40) SMS-SUBMIT
0... .... = TP-RP: TP Reply Path parameter is not set in this SMS SUBMIT/DELIVER
.0.. .... = TP-UDHI: The TP UD field contains only the short message
..1. .... = TP-SRR: A status report is requested
...0 0... = TP-VPF: TP-VP field not present (0)
.... .0.. = TP-RD: Instruct SC to accept duplicates
.... ..01 = TP-MTI: SMS-SUBMIT (1)
TP-MR: 92
TP-Destination-Address - (8000)
TP-PID: 0
TP-DCS: 0
TP-User-Data-Length: (5) depends on Data-Coding-Scheme
TP-User-Data
SMS text: HELLO
Is this something that in configurable at the P-CSCF or the S-CSCF, or would it require now development?
Thanks,
Ron
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Ron,
You should check the response to the "200 OK" to a "REGISTER". It should contain one or more "P-Associated-Identities", with the first one being the default one. If no associated identity matches, the Proxy-CSCF will add the default one as P-Asserted-Identity.
Thanks, Carsten --
Carsten Bock CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH Millerntorplatz 1 20359 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Office +49 40 5247593-40 Fax +49 40 5247593-99
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
Am Mi., 21. Nov. 2018 um 21:01 Uhr schrieb Ron McLeod < ron.kamailio@mcleodnet.com>:
Carsten – thanks for the reply.
I am not trying to change it – the *tel* identity (and other public identities) is already defined in the profile stored in the HSS; I want the S-CSCF to insert P-Preferred-Identity headers for the IMPU’s associated with the UE, which it already knows since it downloaded the profile directly from the HSS.
The P-CSCF and the handset itself *may* know these public identities as well if it would have SUBSCRIBEd for registration events from the S-CSCF, but in practice, I do not see the handset providing anything other than the IMPI, and the Kamailio-based P-CSCF with my current configuration does not insert any P-Asserted-Identity headers.
TS 24.341 does suggest that either the P-CSCF or the S-CSCF could insert the header(s), and in the examples provided in Annex B.5 of the same document show the additional P-Asserted-Identity header being added by the S-CSCF before forwarding the request to the IP-SM-GW:
*UE to P-CSCF*
MESSAGE sip:sc.home1.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [5555::aaa:bbb:ccc:ddd]:1357;comp=sigcomp; branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: sip:pcscf1.visited1.net:7531;lr;comp=sigcomp, < sip:orig@scscf1.home1.net;lr>
P-Preferred-Identity: "John Doe" sip:user1_public1@home1.net
From: sip:user1_public1@home1.net; tag=171828
Call-ID: cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333
Cseq: 666 MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Content-Length: (...)
*P-CSCF to S-CSCF*
MESSAGE sip:sc.home1.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pcscf1.visited1.net;branch=z9hG4bK240f341, SIP/2.0/UDP
[5555::aaa:bbb:ccc:ddd]:1357;comp=sigcomp; branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 69
Route: sip:orig@scscf1.home1.net;lr
P-Asserted-Identity: "John Doe" sip:user1_public1@home1.net
From: sip:user1_public1@home1.net; tag=171828
To: sip:sc.home1.net
Call-ID: cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333
Cseq: 666 MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Content-Length: (...)
*S-CSCF to IP-SM-GW*
MESSAGE sip:sc.home1.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP scscf1.home1.net;branch=z9hG4bK344a651, SIP/2.0/UDP
pcscf1.visited1.net;branch=z9hG4bK240f341, SIP/2.0/UDP
[5555::aaa:bbb:ccc:ddd]:1357;comp=sigcomp; branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 68
Route: sip:ipsmgw.home1.net;lr, < sip:cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333@scscf1.home1.net;lr>
P-Asserted-Identity: "John Doe" sip:user1_public1@home1.net
P-Asserted-Identity: tel:+12125551111
From: sip:user1_public1@home1.net; tag=171828
To: sip:sc.home1.net
Call-ID: cb03a0s09a2sdfglkj490333
Cseq: 666 MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Content-Length: (...)
Ron
*From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] *On Behalf Of *Carsten Bock *Sent:* Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:35 AM *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] IMS: SMS over IP - how to get the originator's tel address?
Hi Ron,
You can't change it on the Proxy-CSCF, but on the HSS. According to 3GPP Specs, the first identity associated to an IMPI is the "default-identity", which is typically used by the phone and asserted by the Proxy-CSCF.
Thanks,
Carsten
Am Mi., 21. Nov. 2018, 00:31 hat Ron McLeod ron.kamailio@mcleodnet.com geschrieben:
I am working on a VoLTE/IMS scenario to transfer text messages as SMS over IP (+g.3gpp.smsip feature) between UE’s. This is a high-level view of the message flows between the endpoints (not showing CSCFs):
UE1 IP-SM-GW
|---- MESSAGE (SUBMIT) --------------->|
|<------------------- 202 ACCEPTED ----|
| |
|<-------- MESSAGE (SUBMIT_REPORT) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
|
UE2 |
| |
|<-------------- MESSAGE (DELIVER) ----|
|---- 200 OK ------------------------->|
The messages does get transferred from UE1 to UE2 successfully. Since this is GSM-style SMS, the OA (originating address) and DA (destination address) are specified using telephone numbers, not sip addresses. This is not a problem for the DA, since it is specified in the SUBMIT TPDU from the originating handset, but when the IP-SM-GW sends the DELIVER TPDU it needs to specify the OA so that the recipient knows who sent the SMS, and this was not provided in the MESSAGE with the SMS-SUBMIT.
According to 3GPP TS 24.341 (http://www.qtc.jp/3GPP/Specs/24341-b20.pdf):
"The IP-SM-GW will have to use an address of the SM-over-IP sender that the SC can process (i.e. an E.164 number). This address will come from a tel URI in a P-Asserted-Identity header (as defined in RFC 3325 [13]) placed in the SIP MESSAGE request by the P-CSCF or S-CSCF."
Looking at the MESSAGE request sent from the S-CSCF to the IP-SM-GW, it looks like neither the P-CSCF nor the S-CSCF is providing the tel address in a P-Asserted-Identity header:
MESSAGE tel:+3108012345680 SIP/2.0
Route: sip:defaultapp@tas.core.ims1.test;lr, sip:iscmark@scscf.core.ims1.test :6060;lr;s=1;h=0;d=0;a=7369703a30303130333031323334353637383940696d732e6d6e633030332e6d63633030312e336770706e6574776f726b2e6f7267
P-Served-User: <sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org
;sescase=orig;regstate=reg
f: sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org;tag=2703358633
CSeq: 555874977 MESSAGE
i: 2703358625_2324045032@2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:EB88:150:0:0:0:22]:6060;branch=z9hG4bKb857.bd3345ba81ec10b1d11639d9c7414606.0;i=a
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP [2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9];branch=z9hG4bKb857.be53cc1c583b9c5f9dcebf3306f2b7c1.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP [2001:470:eb88:b021:27f:9507:589d:c201]:8906;rport=8013;branch=z9hG4bK3552622488
Max-Forwards: 68
P-Access-Network-Info: 3GPP-E-UTRAN-FDD; utran-cell-id-3gpp=0010300030000001
c: application/vnd.3gpp.sms
Allow: MESSAGE
d: no-fork
User-Agent: Xiaomi_Redmi 3S_Android6.0.1_9
l: 27
P-Charging-Vector: icid-value=49565300000000511100004B01000000; icid-generated-at=2001:470:EB88:150:5054:FF:FE44:BFC9
P-Asserted-Identity: < sip:001030123456789@ims.mnc003.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org>
P-Visited-Network-ID: core.ims1.test
Message Body
GSM A-I/F RP - RP-DATA (MS to Network) Message Type RP-DATA (MS to Network) RP-Message Reference RP-Message Reference: 0x05 (5) RP-Originator Address RP-Destination Address - (3108012345680) RP-User Data Length: 14 TPDU (not displayed) GSM SMS TPDU (GSM 03.40) SMS-SUBMIT 0... .... = TP-RP: TP Reply Path parameter is not set in this
SMS SUBMIT/DELIVER
.0.. .... = TP-UDHI: The TP UD field contains only the short
message
..1. .... = TP-SRR: A status report is requested ...0 0... = TP-VPF: TP-VP field not present (0) .... .0.. = TP-RD: Instruct SC to accept duplicates .... ..01 = TP-MTI: SMS-SUBMIT (1) TP-MR: 92 TP-Destination-Address - (8000) TP-PID: 0 TP-DCS: 0 TP-User-Data-Length: (5) depends on Data-Coding-Scheme TP-User-Data SMS text: HELLO
Is this something that in configurable at the P-CSCF or the S-CSCF, or would it require now development?
Thanks,
Ron
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users