Right.... minimising cost is priority #1... and in this particular case the cheapest route
is NOT used.
----- Original Message ----
From: Andreas Sikkema <h323(a)ramdyne.nl>
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:20:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] LCR Routing.... Choosing Best Route
On Mar 28, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
However, when you get routes from multiple carriers,
they don't
always bill on the same prefix boundaries. In my example above, LCR/
Carierroute would match against Carrier1 for anything starting with
1650. HOWEVER, since 165 is also applicable (165 means 1650, 1651
and so on), and in this example cheaper, you should route 165 over
Carrier 2.
What do people do in this case?
It's called LCR for a reason, so I think minimizing cost should be
priority 1. Once price has stopped being the differentiator other
factors could be taken into account. Maybe price and other costs have
to aggregated?
--
Andreas Sikkema
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping