8 Mar
2016
8 Mar
'16
8:08 a.m.
my program structure is
LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS
KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server
KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here
when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE by
TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by UDP.
when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP:
INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP
KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
and LinPhone recive that INVITE.
*my question is:*
LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER.
FS send INVITE:
INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP
and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,* but KA_EDGE send the INVITE to
A' TCP connnection*
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?
8 Mar
8 Mar
8:17 a.m.
kamailio version is 4.2.1
2016-03-08 15:08 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
my program structure is
LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS
KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server
KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here
when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE by
TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by UDP.
when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP:
INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP
KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
and LinPhone recive that INVITE.
*my question is:*
LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER.
FS send INVITE:
INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP
and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,* but KA_EDGE send the INVITE
to A' TCP connnection*
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?
9 Mar
9 Mar
2:48 a.m.
Someone had this problem? Or It's a bug that has been resolved
2016-03-08 15:17 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
kamailio version is 4.2.1
2016-03-08 15:08 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
my program structure is
LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS
KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server
KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here
when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE by
TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by UDP.
when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP:
INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP
KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
and LinPhone recive that INVITE.
*my question is:*
LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER.
FS send INVITE:
INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP
and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,* but KA_EDGE send the INVITE
to A' TCP connnection*
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?
7:49 a.m.
Are you using Path with received parameter on KA Edge?
Are bot Linphone behind the same NAT router?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/03/16 08:08, 张顺通 wrote:
my program structure is
LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS
KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server
KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here
when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE
by TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by
UDP.
when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP:
INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP
KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
and LinPhone recive that INVITE.
*my question is:*
LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER.
FS send INVITE:
INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP
and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,*but KA_EDGE send the INVITE
to A' TCP connnection*
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
3:05 p.m.
Yes，Use Path in DB. like <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Linphone behind the same NAT router.
2016-03-09 14:49 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Are you using Path with received parameter on KA
Edge?
Are bot Linphone behind the same NAT router?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/03/16 08:08, 张顺通 wrote:
my program structure is
LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS
KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server
KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here
when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE by
TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by UDP.
when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP:
INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP
KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
and LinPhone recive that INVITE.
*my question is:*
LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER.
FS send INVITE:
INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP
and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,* but KA_EDGE send the INVITE
to A' TCP connnection*
INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:37 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
14 Mar
14 Mar
4:05 a.m.
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob> --> <sip:
10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can solve
the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>nl>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
11:26 a.m.
Adding received information to Path helps to identify properly the
connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal
IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11
<http://10.10.10.11>;lr;ob>
--> <sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can
solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl
<mailto:d.tryba@pocos.nl>>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
<http://10.10.232.29>;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
1:06 p.m.
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Adding received information to Path helps to identify
properly the
connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob> --> <sip:
10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can solve
the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>nl>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通
wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2:42 p.m.
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding received is important
in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for
devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be
many layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same local ip/port for
devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Adding received information to Path helps to identify properly the
connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same
NAT, practically they show the same source IP when they send
traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and
internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace
add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11
<http://10.10.10.11>;lr;ob>
--> <sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change
can solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl
<mailto:d.tryba@pocos.nl>>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
<http://10.10.232.29>;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge
server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
15 Mar
15 Mar
3:36 a.m.
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to REGISTER,
Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP 30.9.2.1:50691
;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while use
this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in DB(contact
field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right nat
ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746, it send to another
nat ip and port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding
received is important
in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for
devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be many
layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < <miconda(a)gmail.com>
miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Adding received information to Path helps to
identify properly the
connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob> --> <sip:
10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can solve
the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba < <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>
d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>gt;:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通
wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
9:08 a.m.
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which includes the REGISTER,
replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to
REGISTER, Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP
30.9.2.1:50691;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while
use this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in
DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right
nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746
<http://42.1.7.1:33746>, it send to another nat ip and port(other
Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding received is
important in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique
for devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because
there can be many layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same
local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Adding received information to Path helps to identify
properly the connection to be used. Because both devices are
behind the same NAT, practically they show the same source IP
when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP
and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace
add_path() to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1)
in KA_REGISTER server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11
<http://10.10.10.11>;lr;ob>
-->
<sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this
change can solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl
<mailto:d.tryba@pocos.nl>>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
<http://10.10.232.29>;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received
options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio
edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
21 Mar
21 Mar
3:50 a.m.
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which
includes the REGISTER,
replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to REGISTER,
Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP 30.9.2.1:50691
;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while use
this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in
DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right
nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746, it send to
another nat ip and port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < <miconda(a)gmail.com>
miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why
adding received is important
in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for
devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be many
layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Adding received information to Path helps to
identify properly the
connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob> --> <sip:
10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can
solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba < <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>
d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>gt;:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通
wrote:
> Yes，Use Path in DB. like <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
;lr;ob>
> KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
9:45 a.m.
Quickly looked at the file and I see several calls there. All of them
are exposing the issue? Or can you give the call-id of the call that
didn't work fine? I don't want to lose time looking at all the calls,
knowing one that is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which includes the
REGISTER, replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to
REGISTER, Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP
30.9.2.1:50691;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone
while use this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in
DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have
right nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746
<http://42.1.7.1:33746>, it send to another nat ip and port(other
Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding received
is important in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also
unique for devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true,
because there can be many layers of NATs, which can result in
seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
source IP is same, But port is
different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Adding received information to Path helps to identify
properly the connection to be used. Because both devices
are behind the same NAT, practically they show the same
source IP when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public
IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace
add_path() to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1)
in KA_REGISTER server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11
<http://10.10.10.11>;lr;ob>
-->
<sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to
reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this
change can solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba
<d.tryba(a)pocos.nl <mailto:d.tryba@pocos.nl>>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
> Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
<http://10.10.232.29>;lr;ob>
> KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received
options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the
kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
11:34 a.m.
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 16:45 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Quickly looked at the file and I see several calls
there. All of them are
exposing the issue? Or can you give the call-id of the call that didn't
work fine? I don't want to lose time looking at all the calls, knowing one
that is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < <miconda(a)gmail.com>
miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which
includes the REGISTER,
replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to REGISTER,
Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP 30.9.2.1:50691
;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while use
this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in
DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right
nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746, it send to
another nat ip and port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why
adding received is important
in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for
devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be many
layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
<miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Adding received information to Path helps to
identify properly the
connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path()
to add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob>
--> <sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp
>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can
solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba < <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>
d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>gt;:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
> > Yes，Use Path in DB. like <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
> ;lr;ob>
> > KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
>
> Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
> <http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216>
> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
> and
>
>
<http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.path_use_received>
>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
>
> (and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
22 Mar
22 Mar
2:58 p.m.
New subject: Reply:Re: TCP connection select problem
建议使用GRUU，可以回避同一个点登录，多个location 地址。
At 2016-03-21 18:34:41, "张顺通" <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 16:45 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Quickly looked at the file and I see several calls there. All of them are exposing the
issue? Or can you give the call-id of the call that didn't work fine? I don't want
to lose time looking at all the calls, knowing one that is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which includes the REGISTER, replies and the
call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to REGISTER, Server will tell
Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP
30.9.2.1:50691;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while use this Ip and
Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right nat ip and port
like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746, it send to another nat ip and
port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding received is important in this
situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for devices behind a
nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be many layers of NATs, which can
result in seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Adding received information to Path helps to identify properly the connection to be used.
Because both devices are behind the same NAT, practically they show the same source IP
when they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace add_path() to
add_path_received() in edge server.
add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
server.
DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob> -->
<sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can solve the problem?
Thanks for Your Time.
2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>nl>:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
Yes，Use Path in DB. like
<sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29;lr;ob>
KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
and
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
(and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
23 Mar
23 Mar
11:53 a.m.
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 18:34 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 16:45 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Quickly looked at the file and I see several
calls there. All of them are
exposing the issue? Or can you give the call-id of the call that didn't
work fine? I don't want to lose time looking at all the calls, knowing one
that is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < <miconda(a)gmail.com>
miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which
includes the REGISTER,
replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to REGISTER,
Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP 30.9.2.1:50691
;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while use
this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in
DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right
nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746, it send to
another nat ip and port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why
adding received is
important in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for
devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be many
layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
source IP is same, But port is different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
<miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com>:
> Adding received information to Path helps to identify properly the
> connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
> practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
>
> KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
> I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace
add_path()
> to add_path_received() in edge server.
> add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
> server.
>
> DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob>
> --> <sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=
> sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
>
> This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
> Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can
> solve the problem?
>
> Thanks for Your Time.
>
>
>
> 2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba < <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>
> d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>gt;:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
>> > Yes，Use Path in DB. like <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
>> ;lr;ob>
>> > KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
>>
>> Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
>> <http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216>
>> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
>> and
>>
>>
<http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.path_use_received>
>>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
>>
>> (and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge server).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
12:23 p.m.
Had to go in a trip -- will look at it when I get the first chance.
Daniel
On 23/03/16 11:53, 张顺通 wrote:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 18:34 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com
<mailto:shuntongzhang@gmail.com>>:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 16:45 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Quickly looked at the file and I see several calls there. All
of them are exposing the issue? Or can you give the call-id of
the call that didn't work fine? I don't want to lose time
looking at all the calls, knowing one that is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which includes
the REGISTER, replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200
OK to REGISTER, Server will tell Linphone the Linphone
Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP
30.9.2.1:50691;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port,
Linphone while use this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and
save in DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER
already have right nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746
<http://42.1.7.1:33746>, it send to another nat ip and
port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding
received is important in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of the
cases also unique for devices behind a nat router,
it is not 100% true, because there can be many
layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same
local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
source IP is same, But port is
different。
like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Adding received information to Path helps to
identify properly the connection to be used.
Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
practically they show the same source IP when
they send traffic to server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
> KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and
> internal IP.
> I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
and
> replace add_path() to add_path_received() in
> edge server.
> add modparam("registrar",
"path_use_received",
> 1) in KA_REGISTER server.
>
> DB path
> info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11
<http://10.10.10.11>;lr;ob>
> -->
<sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
>
> This kind of situation very little，It is not
> easy to reappear.
> Can you tell me why this situation happen?
> and Why this change can solve the problem?
>
> Thanks for Your Time.
>
>
>
> 2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba
> <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl <mailto:d.tryba@pocos.nl>>:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800,
> 张顺通 wrote:
> > Yes，Use Path in DB. like
> <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
> <http://10.10.232.29>;lr;ob>
> > KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
>
> Should not be a problem if you use the
> use_received options in
>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
> and
>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
>
> (and actually add the source as received
> on the kamailio edge server).
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
> (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER)
- sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
3:06 p.m.
have a nice trip, :).
2016-03-23 19:23 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Had to go in a trip -- will look at it when I get the
first chance.
Daniel
On 23/03/16 11:53, 张顺通 wrote:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 18:34 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 16:45 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < <miconda(a)gmail.com>
miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Quickly looked at the file and I see several
calls there. All of them
are exposing the issue? Or can you give the call-id of the call that didn't
work fine? I don't want to lose time looking at all the calls, knowing one
that is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
<miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com>:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which
includes the REGISTER,
replies and the call showing the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
sorry，I have not expressed clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In first 200 OK to
REGISTER, Server will tell Linphone the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP 30.9.2.1:50691
;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and port, Linphone while use
this Ip and Port in second REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and port and save in
DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER already have right
nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg to 42.1.7.1:33746, it send to
another nat ip and port(other Linphone's ip and port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
<miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com>:
> Indeed, the ports are different, that's why adding received is
> important in this situation.
>
> While local ip and local port are in most of the cases also unique for
> devices behind a nat router, it is not 100% true, because there can be many
> layers of NATs, which can result in seeing same local ip/port for devices.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
>
> source IP is same, But port is different。
> like INVITE sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
>
>
> 2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> <miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com>:
>
>> Adding received information to Path helps to identify properly the
>> connection to be used. Because both devices are behind the same NAT,
>> practically they show the same source IP when they send traffic to server.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
>>
>> KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP and internal IP.
>> I add modparam("path", "use_received", 1) and replace
add_path()
>> to add_path_received() in edge server.
>> add modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) in
KA_REGISTER
>> server.
>>
>> DB path info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11;lr;ob>
>> --> <sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=
>> sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
>>
>> This kind of situation very little，It is not easy to reappear.
>> Can you tell me why this situation happen? and Why this change can
>> solve the problem?
>>
>> Thanks for Your Time.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba < <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>
>> d.tryba(a)pocos.nl>gt;:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
>>> > Yes，Use Path in DB. like <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
>>> ;lr;ob>
>>> > KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
>>>
>>> Should not be a problem if you use the use_received options in
>>> <http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216>
>>> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
>>> and
>>>
>>>
<http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.path_use_received>
>>>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
>>>
>>> (and actually add the source as received on the kamailio edge
>>> server).
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>>> list
>>> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
31 Mar
31 Mar
6:08 p.m.
Finally, after releasing Kamailio 4.4.0, I got some time to look at the
sip trace you sent me. It is only from port 8000 to outside. I need to
see also the traffic towards the internal network. Seeing only what is
sent out doesn't help, because I need to see what kamailio receives from
internal network to be sent out.
You can use ngrep to capture on many ports and devices, like:
ngrep -d any -qt -O /tmp/sip-trace.pcap -W byline "sip" port 5060 or
port 8000
Send me the new trace with traffic on both sides to be able to
investigate properly.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 23/03/16 15:06, 张顺通 wrote:
have a nice trip, :).
2016-03-23 19:23 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Had to go in a trip -- will look at it when I get the first chance.
Daniel
On 23/03/16 11:53, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 18:34 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com
<mailto:shuntongzhang@gmail.com>>:
Have provided Callid, thanks.
register callid
2bbadd72-d733-434e-bd06-45d9ddb5289b
a7fa5d8f-1e46-4605-9a6e-08751bc75fee
call
626fec11-684b-1234-d0b9-ecf4bbde9ef8
2016-03-21 16:45 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Quickly looked at the file and I see several calls there.
All of them are exposing the issue? Or can you give the
call-id of the call that didn't work fine? I don't want
to lose time looking at all the calls, knowing one that
is wrong is enough...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/03/16 03:50, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
I Send you pcap Separatly.
Sorry, can't send pcap to mail list.
Thanks
2016-03-15 16:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Can you attach a pcap with such situation, which
includes the REGISTER, replies and the call showing
the issue?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/03/16 03:36, 张顺通 wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
sorry，I have not expressed
clearly.
kamailio will recive two REGISTER at a time.In
first 200 OK to REGISTER, Server will tell Linphone
the Linphone Nat Ip and Port.
like this:
Via:SIP/2.0/TCP
30.9.2.1:50691;received=42.1.7.1;alias;branch=z9hG4bK.kmhC2L9Rf;rport=33746
and Linphone will know it's outside nat Ip and
port, Linphone while use this Ip and Port in second
REGISTER.
like this:
REGSITER
Contact:<sip: 42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp>
So kamailio server know Linphone's nated ip and
port and save in DB(contact field).
my question is KA_EDGE receive sip from KA_REGISTER
already have right nat ip and port like
INVITE 123456@42.1.7.1:33746;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
but KA_EDGE do not send this sip msg
to 42.1.7.1:33746 <http://42.1.7.1:33746>, it send
to another nat ip and port(other Linphone's ip and
port behind same NAT layer)
2016-03-14 21:42 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Indeed, the ports are different, that's why
adding received is important in this situation.
While local ip and local port are in most of
the cases also unique for devices behind a nat
router, it is not 100% true, because there can
be many layers of NATs, which can result in
seeing same local ip/port for devices.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:06, 张顺通 wrote:
> source IP is same, But port is different。
> like INVITE
> sip:Linphone_nat_Ip:Linphone_nat_port;tcp;
>
>
> 2016-03-14 18:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin
> Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
>
> Adding received information to Path helps
> to identify properly the connection to be
> used. Because both devices are behind the
> same NAT, practically they show the same
> source IP when they send traffic to server.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/03/16 04:05, 张顺通 wrote:
>> KA_EDGE have two IP，external public IP
>> and internal IP.
>> I add modparam("path",
"use_received", 1)
>> and replace add_path()
>> to add_path_received() in edge server.
>> add modparam("registrar",
>> "path_use_received", 1) in KA_REGISTER
>> server.
>>
>> DB path
>> info <sip:aD15fXXXXXXXXXXXXeEpfqRY=@10.10.10.11
>> <http://10.10.10.11>;lr;ob>
>> -->
<sip:10.10.10.11;lr;received=sip:42.129.1.1:43640%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
>>
>> This kind of situation very little，It is
>> not easy to reappear.
>> Can you tell me why this situation
>> happen? and Why this change can solve the
>> problem?
>>
>> Thanks for Your Time.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-03-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Daniel Tryba
>> <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl
<mailto:d.tryba@pocos.nl>>:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:05:11PM
>> +0800, 张顺通 wrote:
>> > Yes，Use Path in DB. like
>> <sip:XXxXXXXXXXXXX/ogxZg=@10.10.232.29
<http://10.10.232.29>;lr;ob>
>> > KA_REGISTER wile the path info in DB.
>>
>> Should not be a problem if you use
>> the use_received options in
>>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp135216
>> and
>>
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.…
>>
>> (and actually add the source as
>> received on the kamailio edge server).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
>> (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
> <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
> (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
2959
days inactive
2982
days old
19 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
8217020 -
Daniel Tryba -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
张顺通