Re: [Serusers] Re: [Serdev] rel_0_9_0 release critical bugs/missingthings - sr-users

21 Jun 2005

Undocummented code = non existing code (for almomst everyone except the developer and few
guys reading the devel list, updating the working copy of the CVS, and checking the new
code).....I know it is unpleasant, but two lines with an overview is not asking too
much.....isn't it?

my contribution,

Samuel.

Unclassified.
...
 >> Jan Janak &lt;jan(a)iptel.org&gt; 06/21/05
11:58AM >>> On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
...
  Greger V. Teigre writes:

      Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as
complete as possible now 
 leading up to the release!!  
 nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes.  tm module
 README seems to lack description of several exported functions.

 these both are example of bad iptel.org policy.  no new features should
 be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation
 is updated. 
  Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not
  update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented
  code or having no code ?

    Jan.

_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
serdev(a)lists.iptel.org 
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev