3 Apr
2006
3 Apr
'06
11:20 p.m.
We have a commercial SIP server which currently does our registering,
low cost routing and customer billing. However, it doesn't handle NATed
connections well. To fix this, I wanted to use openser in front of it
for customer connections using mediaproxy/rtpproxy. However, I have a
problem with this setup.
From what I gather, for the proxy to work properly, the
end user need to
be registered with the proxy so that it can do nat pings and keep
the
nat connection alive. But for users to make calls using our commercial
server (which is what we want), they must be registered there. Is it
possible (or even a good idea) to have a user registered on 2 servers at
the same time? How else can we do this?
This is what I want to achieve:
- from the end user perspective, they register and initiate calls only
via the openser proxy. They know nothing of our commercial server.
- calls between users is done on the openser proxy
- calls to external destinations (i.e. PSTN) go via our commercial
server and require that the user is registered there
Is this possible?
Jeff
4 Apr
4 Apr
3:38 a.m.
It seems that what you want is third party registration. I'm pretty sure you
can tell OpenSER to register your users on your other SIP server by
diverting the 'REGISTER' request.
2006/4/4, Jeff Williams <jeffw(a)globaldial.com>om>:
We have a commercial SIP server which currently does our registering,
low cost routing and customer billing. However, it doesn't handle NATed
connections well. To fix this, I wanted to use openser in front of it
for customer connections using mediaproxy/rtpproxy. However, I have a
problem with this setup.
From what I gather, for the proxy to work
properly, the end user need to
be registered with the proxy so that it can do nat
pings and keep the
nat connection alive. But for users to make calls using our commercial
server (which is what we want), they must be registered there. Is it
possible (or even a good idea) to have a user registered on 2 servers at
the same time? How else can we do this?
This is what I want to achieve:
- from the end user perspective, they register and initiate calls only
via the openser proxy. They know nothing of our commercial server.
- calls between users is done on the openser proxy
- calls to external destinations (i.e. PSTN) go via our commercial
server and require that the user is registered there
Is this possible?
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
4:11 a.m.
Simon Morvan wrote:
It seems that what you want is third party
registration. I'm pretty
sure you can tell OpenSER to register your users on your other SIP
server by diverting the 'REGISTER' request.
But does the mediaproxy/rtpproxy work if the REGISTER request is
diverted to a third party?
Jeff
5:08 a.m.
I'm not a mediaproxy/rtpproxy expert but as far as your users are still
registered with OpenSER it should work.
Can someone confirm that?
2006/4/4, Jeff Williams <jeffw(a)globaldial.com>om>:
Simon Morvan wrote:
It seems that what you want is third party
registration. I'm pretty
sure you can tell OpenSER to register your users on your other SIP
server by diverting the 'REGISTER' request.
But does the mediaproxy/rtpproxy work if the REGISTER request is
diverted to a third party?
Jeff
5 Apr
5 Apr
3:35 a.m.
It might not be 100% reliable, but you can use t_replicate in your
openser and, after users are locally register, you can send the
REGISTER to your comercial SIP server.
By unreliability I mean that you can not assure 100% that data in
openser and your comercial server is identical...some REGISTER might
get lost...
Another option you can consider is to look at older threads about high
availability and load balancing. The idea is to have a load balancer
on front of your openser farms. Playing with Path header you can have
a few instances of openser acting as load balancers of your comercial
SIP server. I might be wrong but I think it's not yet finished (what's
not yet done is the NAT pinging....please correct me if I'm wrong).
Hope it helps
Samuel.
2006/4/4, Simon Morvan <garphy(a)gmail.com>om>:
I'm not a mediaproxy/rtpproxy expert but as far as
your users are still
registered with OpenSER it should work.
Can someone confirm that?
2006/4/4, Jeff Williams < jeffw(a)globaldial.com>gt;:
Simon Morvan wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
It seems that what you want is third party
registration. I'm pretty
sure you can tell OpenSER to register your users on your other SIP
server by diverting the 'REGISTER' request.
But does the mediaproxy/rtpproxy work if the REGISTER request is
diverted to a third party?
Jeff
4:24 a.m.
samuel wrote:
It might not be 100% reliable, but you can use
t_replicate in your
openser and, after users are locally register, you can send the
REGISTER to your comercial SIP server.
By unreliability I mean that you can not assure 100% that data in
openser and your comercial server is identical...some REGISTER might
get lost...
This could be possible. However, all of the authencation information in
stored in our commercial server in a Sybase database. Seeing that
openser doens't have a sybase module this makes things very tricky. Not
to mention that I'm not sure how the commercial server crypts/decrypts
passwords.
I was hoping that I could do it in reverse, i.e. only register users
locally if they were able to register on the commercial server. But as
far as I can see this would mean running save("location") in a
onreply_route for a register request where status is 200. But save
doesn't run in onreply_route's and I'm assuming there is a good reason
for it.
Another option you can consider is to look at older
threads about high
availability and load balancing. The idea is to have a load balancer
on front of your openser farms. Playing with Path header you can have
a few instances of openser acting as load balancers of your comercial
SIP server. I might be wrong but I think it's not yet finished (what's
not yet done is the NAT pinging....please correct me if I'm wrong).
This may be the sort of thing I am trying to achieve. I will have a look
for these threads. Thanks.
Jeff
6646
days inactive
6647
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jeff Williams -
samuel -
Simon Morvan