Umm very strange i used the example.cfg and inside there it has the fix_contact in the registration, and in the client_nat_test and also in te onreply_route. so what is the correct format if this is wrong. Sean > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Georgescu [SMTP:ag@ag-projects.com] > Sent: 06 August 2004 11:55 > To: dave(a)fuuz.com > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy + ser0.8.14 problem > > See http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-August/010420.html > > > > ------- > hi all, > > > > Have been trying to get media proxy to work with 0.8.14 and am not > having a huge amount of joy. Basically the route processing seems to > be > fine, but as soon as ser attempts to actually pass traffic through > media > proxy it crashes out! > > > > > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Request from RFC Private IP > Detected --> mediaproxy flagged > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: VOICEMAIL: VM user detected --> > activating VM Flag > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Caller is NAT'd (destination > offline) --> enable reply processing > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Invite received --> enabling > media proxy > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: child process 3066 exited by a > signal 11 > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: core was not generated > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3186]: INFO: signal 15 received > > Aug 5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3193]: INFO: signal 15 received > > > > (the same is true if the destination is online as well). > > > > I may have a problem with symmetric/asymmetric clients, but I don't > think ser should actually crash like that... does anyone have any > ideas? > > > > > Dave << File: ATT13254.txt >>