27 Jun
2007
27 Jun
'07
10:25 p.m.
Hi,
thanks to Ancuta Onofrei, we added today a new transport implementation
for the Management Interface (MI). This is Datagram (via unix and
network sockets) and it completes the migration to MI (after fifo), but
not the last from the transport implementations :).
It is in alpha stage, so more testing is needed.
NOTE that all MI commands are available via datagram interface; also the
syntax of the commands and replies is exactly as for FIFO.
For more info, please see the online documentation:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/mi_datagram.html
or ask on the mailing list.
Any feedback - bugs or improvements - are welcomed.
Also I want to bring in discussion a related subject - dropping the old
unix sockets implementation from the core.
Before doing it I would like to know who is still using it and if there
are any issues with migrating to the new implementation.
Regards,
Bogdan
27 Jun
27 Jun
10:43 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
Also I want to bring in discussion a related subject -
dropping the old
unix sockets implementation from the core.
Before doing it I would like to know who is still using it and if there
are any issues with migrating to the new implementation.
openser/sems communication is currently using unix sockets. openser
send request to sems by t_write_unix(). if the new module works and
behaves the same way as current unix socket implementation, it is ok
with me to drop the old implementation.
-- juha
28 Jun
28 Jun
11:15 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
Hi Juha,
I was expecting SEMS integration to be one of the issues :).
t_write_unix() was not changed at all, but I do not sure what MI
commands SEMS triggers from openser. If you could let me know which are
the functions (most probably from TM), I will take a look at the
compatibility aspect.
regards,
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
Also I want to bring in discussion a related
subject - dropping the old
unix sockets implementation from the core.
Before doing it I would like to know who is still using it and if there
are any issues with migrating to the new implementation.
openser/sems communication is currently using unix sockets. openser
send request to sems by t_write_unix(). if the new module works and
behaves the same way as current unix socket implementation, it is ok
with me to drop the old implementation.
-- juha
11:45 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
t_write_unix() was not changed at all, but I do not
sure what MI
commands SEMS triggers from openser. If you could let me know which are
the functions (most probably from TM), I will take a look at the
compatibility aspect.
sems replies to t_write_unix() call using t_reply on its reply socket.
on the same socket it sends invite/bye/etc. requests using t_uac_dlg
message. this code is all in AmSipDialog.cpp file:
http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/sems/trunk/core/AmSipDialog.cpp?op=file&rev=…
and for sending requests, in its AmSipDialog::sendRequest function.
i have heard rumors that a new sems/ser interface in on the works, but i
don't know details. i'll ask the sems list.
-- juha
11:59 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
For more info, please see the online documentation:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/mi_datagram.html
or ask on the mailing list.
not able to access above url
ram
12:25 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
Hi,
my mistake - it's about the 1.3 version, so the correct uri is:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/mi_datagram.html
thanks and regards,
bogdan
ram wrote:
For more info, please see the online documentation:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/mi_datagram.html
or ask on the mailing list.
not able to access above url
ram
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
12:26 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
On Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007, ram wrote:
For more info, please see the online documentation:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/mi_datagram.html
or ask on the mailing list.
not able to access above url
The right URL is:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/mi_datagram.html
Cheers,
Henning
12:56 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
On 6/28/07, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:
On Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007, ram wrote:
Hi
is this 1.3.X can be used in production ?
ram
For more info, please see the online
documentation:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/mi_datagram.html
or ask on the mailing list.
not able to access above url
The right URL is:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/mi_datagram.html
1:18 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
On Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007, you wrote:
Hi
is this 1.3.X can be used in production ?
No, this is the current development, e.g. svn trunk. 1.3 will be the next
release. For production you should use 1.2.1 or the 1.2 branch in svn.
Cheers,
Henning
6:24 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Re: [OpenSER-Devel] NEW MODULE: Datagram implementation for MI
Hi Juha,
there are 3 MI commands used by SEMS : t_reply, t_uac_cancel, t_uac_dlg,
but only t_reply and t_uac_dlg are effected by the syntax changes.
As it will be difficult to have 2 syntaxes in openser (and as the parser
is a general one with no knowledge about the parsed function), I would
suggest to generate a patch for SEMS to will ensure the compatibility
with openser new interface - on a first look, the changes are minor and
I will happy to assist in building the patch.
regards,
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
t_write_unix() was not changed at all, but I do
not sure what MI
commands SEMS triggers from openser. If you could let me know which are
the functions (most probably from TM), I will take a look at the
compatibility aspect.
sems replies to t_write_unix() call using t_reply on its reply socket.
on the same socket it sends invite/bye/etc. requests using t_uac_dlg
message. this code is all in AmSipDialog.cpp file:
http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/sems/trunk/core/AmSipDialog.cpp?op=file&rev=…
and for sending requests, in its AmSipDialog::sendRequest function.
i have heard rumors that a new sems/ser interface in on the works, but i
don't know details. i'll ask the sems list.
-- juha
6359
days inactive
6360
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Henning Westerholt -
jh＠tutpro.com -
ram