14 Apr
2005
14 Apr
'05
1:18 p.m.
Dear all,
I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
disadvantages:
1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
a new pilepine.
Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
interface?
Thanks,
Martin
14 Apr
14 Apr
2:35 p.m.
Hi Martin,
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
Best regards,
Marian
Martin Rusnak wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
disadvantages:
1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
a new pilepine.
Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
interface?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
2:55 p.m.
Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it exceeded the 40K limit and
is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same functionality
as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as the actual FIFO. For
instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload FIFO command doesn't work.
Regards,
Paul
On 4/14/05, Marian Dumitru <marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro> wrote:
Hi Martin,
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
Best regards,
Marian
Martin Rusnak wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
disadvantages:
1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
a new pilepine.
Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
interface?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
3:26 p.m.
Hi Paul,
I totally agree with you that the exported set of functions is *not* the
same for FIFO, UNIX socket and (you know better) for UDP/TCP socket.
Best regards,
Marian
Java Rockx wrote:
Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it
exceeded the 40K limit
and is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same
functionality as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as
the actual FIFO. For instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload
FIFO command doesn't work.
Regards,
Paul
On 4/14/05, *Marian Dumitru* <marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro
<mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro>> wrote:
Hi Martin,
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
Best regards,
Marian
Martin Rusnak wrote:
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
Dear all,
I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
disadvantages:
1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
a new pilepine.
Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
interface?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
15 Apr
15 Apr
9:37 a.m.
Marian Dumitru writes:
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one.
Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
i tried it and it worked ok for some functions and not for some others.
also, it currently doesn't support an allowed clients file or database
table.
there is something wrong in the design of external access to ser.
an abstraction layer is missing between modules and external access
methods. so each module has to currently support fifo, unix
socket, and also tcp/udp interface.
-- juha
9:43 a.m.
Hi All.
I think the entire ser community would agree that this is not really the
best way to manage external connectivity to ser. It's just a maintenance
nightmare - so an abstraction layer is desperately needed.
I'm also have the opinion that the FIFO needs to be phased out and
completely replaced with a real network server.
Just my $0.02 worth.
Regards,
Paul
On 4/15/05, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Marian Dumitru writes:
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket
one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
i tried it and it worked ok for some functions and not for some others.
also, it currently doesn't support an allowed clients file or database
table.
there is something wrong in the design of external access to ser.
an abstraction layer is missing between modules and external access
methods. so each module has to currently support fifo, unix
socket, and also tcp/udp interface.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
4:16 p.m.
I also found SNMP module in the ser cvs. Perhaps it could be useful for this
purpose. Has anybody ever used it?
Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
I think the entire ser community would agree that this is not really the
best way to manage external connectivity to ser. It's just a maintenance
nightmare - so an abstraction layer is desperately needed.
I'm also have the opinion that the FIFO needs to be phased out and
completely replaced with a real network server.
7098
days inactive
7099
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Java Rockx -
Juha Heinanen -
Marian Dumitru -
Martin Rusnak