18 Sep
2008
18 Sep
'08
9:22 a.m.
MediaProxy2 uses the Linux kernel for routing packets.So it uses all
the cores and CPUs recognized by the kernel.
Adrian
20 Sep
20 Sep
5:20 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
MediaProxy2 uses the Linux kernel for routing
packets.So it uses all
the cores and CPUs recognized by the kernel.
Not in my testing. Thus far I have only ever seen a single CPU core
get utilized by MediaProxy - with a very few calls being processed
before audio problems and very significant delays start showing themselves.
Jeremy McNamara
5:26 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Would be interesting to get info on your server that you're having
problems with Jeremy.
Linux Distro / Version
Hardware
Conntrack Library Version
Python Version
MediaProxy and OpenSIPS Version
GCC Version
Might be something in there somewhere.
_____________________________
Darren Sessions
dmsessions(a)gmail.com
http://www.darrensessions.com
_____________________________
On Sep 20, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
MediaProxy2 uses the Linux kernel for routing
packets.So it uses all
the cores and CPUs recognized by the kernel.
Not in my testing. Thus far I have only ever seen a single CPU core
get utilized by MediaProxy - with a very few calls being processed
before audio problems and very significant delays start showing
themselves.
Jeremy McNamara
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:42 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Darren Sessions wrote:
Would be interesting to get info on your server that
you're having
problems with Jeremy.
Linux Distro / Version
Hardware
Conntrack Library Version
Python Version
MediaProxy and OpenSIPS Version
GCC Version
Might be something in there somewhere.
The latest CentOS. 64 bit platform. I will need to get back in touch
with that customer for any more specific details, as I don't necessarily
have access to their system any longer. They wanted to use
MediaProxy, so I configured it for them, but ultimately we ended up
using Asterisk for RTP/etc.
Jeremy McNamara
5:55 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
If that's the case, have you even used MediaProxy 2.x in production?
Even 2.0.3 hasn't been out that long.
Just curious why you'd complain and then not be able to offer any
specifics? Not flaming you or anything, just makes it tough to answer
any of your claims or try and reproduce something when we don't have
anything to go on. "Latest CentOS" really doesn't mean anything. With
all the variables involved, there isn't anything specific there that'd
help us try and help you.
Granted, I'm not aware if you've got any other posts regarding this
issue, but if there are it's nothing recent that I can recall.
If you're willing to post your configs, and detailed specs., we can
all try and find out what's going on with your / their setup.
I would be curious to see what's going on.
Cheers,
- Darren
_____________________________
Darren Sessions
dmsessions(a)gmail.com
http://www.darrensessions.com
_____________________________
On Sep 20, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Darren Sessions wrote:
Would be interesting to get info on your server
that you're having
problems with Jeremy.
Linux Distro / Version
Hardware
Conntrack Library Version
Python Version
MediaProxy and OpenSIPS Version
GCC Version
Might be something in there somewhere.
The latest CentOS. 64 bit platform. I will need to get back in touch
with that customer for any more specific details, as I don't
necessarily
have access to their system any longer. They wanted to use
MediaProxy, so I configured it for them, but ultimately we ended up
using Asterisk for RTP/etc.
Jeremy McNamara
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6:22 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Darren Sessions wrote:
If that's the case, have you even used MediaProxy
2.x in production?
Even 2.0.3 hasn't been out that long.
I did this last week when someone contacted me to install
OpenSER+MediaProxy since they have tried and failed. I worked their
configuration into a functional situation. Once they started sending
their calls thru this system, they called me back with complaints about
audio problems.
Mediaproxy app was solid at 100% cpu - in top - running 205 simultaneous
calls.
Since this customer was not paying me for development assistance, I
suggested we move to Asterisk as he stated he also needed to be able to
transcode between codecs and someday wanted their own voicemail solution
- so that situation made sense to use Asterisk.
Just curious why you'd complain and then not be
able to offer any
specifics? Not flaming you or anything, just makes it tough to answer
any of your claims or try and reproduce something when we don't have
anything to go on. "Latest CentOS" really doesn't mean anything. With
all the variables involved, there isn't anything specific there that'd
help us try and help you.
I wasn't asking for help.
If you're willing to post your configs, and
detailed specs., we can
all try and find out what's going on with your / their setup.
I would be curious to see what's going on.
I would have to lab it up - as I said this was for someone looking for a
functional solution, not development or research.
If someone has a compensation plan for development and/or research,
please feel free to contact me.
Jeremy McNamara
8:34 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Well, it's obvious now you've got a negative attitude anyways and
trying to constructively help solve whatever situation you've got
would be pointless.
Cheers,
- Darren
_____________________________
Darren Sessions
dmsessions(a)gmail.com
http://www.darrensessions.com
_____________________________
On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Darren Sessions wrote:
If that's the case, have you even used
MediaProxy 2.x in production?
Even 2.0.3 hasn't been out that long.
I did this last week when someone contacted me to install
OpenSER+MediaProxy since they have tried and failed. I worked their
configuration into a functional situation. Once they started sending
their calls thru this system, they called me back with complaints
about
audio problems.
Mediaproxy app was solid at 100% cpu - in top - running 205
simultaneous
calls.
Since this customer was not paying me for development assistance, I
suggested we move to Asterisk as he stated he also needed to be able
to
transcode between codecs and someday wanted their own voicemail
solution
- so that situation made sense to use Asterisk.
Just curious why you'd complain and then not
be able to offer any
specifics? Not flaming you or anything, just makes it tough to answer
any of your claims or try and reproduce something when we don't have
anything to go on. "Latest CentOS" really doesn't mean anything. With
all the variables involved, there isn't anything specific there
that'd
help us try and help you.
I wasn't asking for help.
If you're willing to post your configs, and
detailed specs., we can
all try and find out what's going on with your / their setup.
I would be curious to see what's going on.
I would have to lab it up - as I said this was for someone looking
for a
functional solution, not development or research.
If someone has a compensation plan for development and/or research,
please feel free to contact me.
Jeremy McNamara
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:34 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Your personal experience with this product was always negative, if I
read though your mailing lists posts in the last years. You never
missed a single opportunity to through some mud at it.
It is such a waste of time to say on the mailing lists the same
negative things all over again, everyone knows your opinions about
this matter.
Why are you so concerned about its performance and keep complaining
about a software that you never liked is a dilema.
Adrian
On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
MediaProxy2 uses the Linux kernel for routing
packets.So it uses
all the cores and CPUs recognized by the kernel.
Not in my testing. Thus far I have only ever seen a single CPU
core get utilized by MediaProxy - with a very few calls being
processed before audio problems and very significant delays start
showing themselves.
Jeremy McNamara
5:52 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.1.0
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
Your personal experience with this product was always
negative, if I
read though your mailing lists posts in the last years. You never
missed a single opportunity to through some mud at it.
It is such a waste of time to say on the mailing lists the same
negative things all over again, everyone knows your opinions about
this matter.
Why are you so concerned about its performance and keep complaining
about a software that you never liked is a dilema.
You are awfully defensive. Just the same, if you examine the mailing
lists you are not receptive to suggestion or constructive criticism, for
whatever reasons....
Also, if I hated MediaProxy so much, why did I make my own tutorial(s)
for others to learn from? http://tinyurl.com/2o96a
I happen to live in a free country and until I get told by a moderator
that my opinions based on real world experiences are no longer wanted on
this mailing list, I will provide my opinion to help others in their
efforts of learning OpenSER/Kamaillio/Whatever its called this week.....
Jeremy McNamara
5721
days inactive
5723
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adrian Georgescu -
Darren Sessions -
Jeremy McNamara