Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
The Websocket list looks like this:
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { 8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): *TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found* Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to * sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws*
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com *contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws* path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
*The Websocket list looks like this:*
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { *8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip)* } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
*I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?*
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
The Websocket list looks like this:
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { 8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 wss://98.209.240.245:56291/ -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 wss://134.122.27.49:4443/ (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is supposed to be sent.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): *TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found* Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to * sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws*
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ *contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws* path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
*The Websocket list looks like this:*
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { *8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip)* } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
*I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?*
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hey Daniel,
It returns:
[LOCATION] ru: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss, nh(u): sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws
This matches the output from
kamcmd ws.dump
connections: { 29: wss:98.209.240.245:50453 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 22s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I can grade to 5.3 if you think that’s best.
On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is supposed to be sent.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
The Websocket list looks like this:
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { 8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 wss://98.209.240.245:56291/ -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 wss://134.122.27.49:4443/ (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hello,
did you print the log message just before t_relay()?
Can you also print the tcp and tls connections via rpc? I am not sure if the websocket keeps a separate list of connections, but tcp/tls should have the lists used for routing.
It would be better to upgrade to 5.3, because 5.1 is out of maintenance and if there is still an issue, it is easier to troubleshoot and fix. Then you can backport locally to 5.1, if you have to run that version on specific systems.
Cheers, Daniel
On 16.04.20 05:10, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey Daniel,
It returns:
[LOCATION] ru: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss, *nh(u): sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws*
This matches the output from
kamcmd ws.dump
connections: { 29: wss:*98.209.240.245:50453* -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 22s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I can grade to 5.3 if you think that’s best.
On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is supposed to be sent.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): *TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found* Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to * sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws*
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ *contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws* path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
*The Websocket list looks like this:*
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { *8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip)* } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
*I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?*
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hello,
I upgrade to 5.3 and got the same result. But, I noticed that changing the connection_id in the database to the connection_id of the web socket connection listed by ws.dump made it work.
So, it looks like the socket or the connection_id is not being set when the record is stored by usrloc. I think this is the true issue. Any suggestions where to look?
On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
did you print the log message just before t_relay()?
Can you also print the tcp and tls connections via rpc? I am not sure if the websocket keeps a separate list of connections, but tcp/tls should have the lists used for routing.
It would be better to upgrade to 5.3, because 5.1 is out of maintenance and if there is still an issue, it is easier to troubleshoot and fix. Then you can backport locally to 5.1, if you have to run that version on specific systems.
Cheers, Daniel
On 16.04.20 05:10, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey Daniel,
It returns:
[LOCATION] ru: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss, nh(u): sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws
This matches the output from
kamcmd ws.dump
connections: { 29: wss:98.209.240.245:50453 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 wss://134.122.27.49:4443/ (state: OPEN, last used 22s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I can grade to 5.3 if you think that’s best.
On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is supposed to be sent.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey All,
I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws
*************************** 2. row *************************** id: 124 ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws path: NULL expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 q: -1.00 callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 cseq: 50096 last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
The Websocket list looks like this:
Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { 8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 wss://98.209.240.245:56291/ -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 wss://134.122.27.49:4443/ (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
-Mack
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Here is what one of my registrations look like
id: 148 ruid: uloc-5e999161-1782-1 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:63356;transport=ws path: NULL expires: 2020-04-17 12:30:14 q: -1.00 callid: 73beb50f-65de-a461-be26-187c9aaa53c1 cseq: 48179 last_modified: 2020-04-17 12:26:54 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 socket: NULL methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 18
On Apr 17, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Mack Hendricks mack@dopensource.com wrote:
Hello,
I upgrade to 5.3 and got the same result. But, I noticed that changing the connection_id in the database to the connection_id of the web socket connection listed by ws.dump made it work.
So, it looks like the socket or the connection_id is not being set when the record is stored by usrloc. I think this is the true issue. Any suggestions where to look?
On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
did you print the log message just before t_relay()?
Can you also print the tcp and tls connections via rpc? I am not sure if the websocket keeps a separate list of connections, but tcp/tls should have the lists used for routing.
It would be better to upgrade to 5.3, because 5.1 is out of maintenance and if there is still an issue, it is easier to troubleshoot and fix. Then you can backport locally to 5.1, if you have to run that version on specific systems.
Cheers, Daniel
On 16.04.20 05:10, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey Daniel,
It returns:
[LOCATION] ru: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss, nh(u): sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws
This matches the output from
kamcmd ws.dump
connections: { 29: wss:98.209.240.245:50453 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 wss://134.122.27.49:4443/ (state: OPEN, last used 22s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I can grade to 5.3 if you think that’s best.
On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is supposed to be sent.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or by destination address.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote: > Hey All, > > > > I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client: > > > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): content-length: 651 (651) > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: No error (2/SL) > Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit > > > > Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send the call to sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws > > > *************************** 2. row *************************** > id: 124 > ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 > username: 2000 > domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ > contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss > received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws > path: NULL > expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 > q: -1.00 > callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 > cseq: 50096 > last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 > flags: 0 > cflags: 524352 > user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 > socket: NULL > methods: NULL > instance: NULL > reg_id: 0 > server_id: 0 > connection_id: -1 > keepalive: 1 > partition: 18 > > > The Websocket list looks like this: > > > Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump > { > connections: { > 8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 wss://98.209.240.245:56291/ -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 wss://134.122.27.49:4443/ (state: OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip) > } > info: { > wscounter: 1 > truncated: no > } > } > > > I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas? > > > Thanks in advance > > -Mack > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
That's quite strange, the registrar/usrloc are not related to websocket in storing the connection id, they see it as a tcp/tls connection. I checked on a test server and all tcp/tls contacts have connection id and socket field set.
Do you get any error messages when processing the REGISTER?
If not, give here the parameters you set for registrar and usrloc modules along with all debug messages with debug-3 in cfg when processing the REGISTER (just replace any sensitive data).
Cheers, Daniel
On 17.04.20 14:34, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Here is what one of my registrations look like
id: 148 ruid: uloc-5e999161-1782-1 username: 2000 domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss received: sip:98.209.240.245:63356;transport=ws path: NULL expires: 2020-04-17 12:30:14 q: -1.00 callid: 73beb50f-65de-a461-be26-187c9aaa53c1 cseq: 48179 last_modified: 2020-04-17 12:26:54 flags: 0 cflags: 524352 user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 * socket: NULL* methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 0 server_id: 0 *connection_id: -1* keepalive: 1 partition: 18
On Apr 17, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Mack Hendricks <mack@dopensource.com mailto:mack@dopensource.com> wrote:
Hello,
I upgrade to 5.3 and got the same result. But, I noticed that changing the connection_id in the database to the connection_id of the web socket connection listed by ws.dump made it work.
So, it looks like the socket or the connection_id is not being set when the record is stored by usrloc. I think this is the true issue. Any suggestions where to look?
On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
did you print the log message just before t_relay()?
Can you also print the tcp and tls connections via rpc? I am not sure if the websocket keeps a separate list of connections, but tcp/tls should have the lists used for routing.
It would be better to upgrade to 5.3, because 5.1 is out of maintenance and if there is still an issue, it is easier to troubleshoot and fix. Then you can backport locally to 5.1, if you have to run that version on specific systems.
Cheers, Daniel
On 16.04.20 05:10, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey Daniel,
It returns:
[LOCATION] ru: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss, *nh(u): sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws*
This matches the output from
kamcmd ws.dump
connections: { 29: wss:*98.209.240.245:50453* -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN, last used 22s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }
I can grade to 5.3 if you think that’s best.
On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is supposed to be sent.
Cheers, Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that the connection address and port matches the received address and port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > what version of Kamailio do you use? > > That message is printed when the connection is not found by id > or by destination address. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> >> >> I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket >> client: >> >> >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): >> no multi-part body >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder(): >> content-length: 651 (651) >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder(): >> *TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found* >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]: >> build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add >> branches >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack >> returned error -2 (-2) >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply >> generation delayed >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error >> reply used: No error (2/SL) >> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]: >> exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit >> >> >> >> Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to >> send the call to * sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws* >> >> >> *************************** 2. row *************************** >> id: 124 >> ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92 >> username: 2000 >> domain: ws-test.com http://ws-test.com/ >> *contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid >> mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss >> received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws* >> path: NULL >> expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17 >> q: -1.00 >> callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533 >> cseq: 50096 >> last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57 >> flags: 0 >> cflags: 524352 >> user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04 >> socket: NULL >> methods: NULL >> instance: NULL >> reg_id: 0 >> server_id: 0 >> connection_id: -1 >> keepalive: 1 >> partition: 18 >> >> >> *The Websocket list looks like this:* >> >> >> Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump >> { >> connections: { >> *8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: >> OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip)* >> } >> info: { >> wscounter: 1 >> truncated: no >> } >> } >> >> * >> * >> *I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?* >> * >> * >> * >> * >> Thanks in advance >> >> -Mack >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com > www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Mack Hendricks