Hi, that column was added in 3.0.0 and not reflected in siremis. I just committed a patch for it on sourceforge.net svn: http://sourceforge.net/projects/siremis/ Try with it and let me know if all is fine now. I guess the 0 value behavior is something related to lcr module internals, maybe Juha can tell more. Thanks for reporting, Ramona On 09/08/2010 11:55 AM, klaus.lists(a)inode.at wrote: > BTW: > > additionally I found out that in case that all lcr_ids are set to '0' > (as it is by default in table gw!) the MI commands 'lcr_gw_dump' and > 'lcr_lcr_dump' do not bring any result...... > As soon as I change the lcr_ids to '1' (e.g.) all entries with a value > above '0' are visible with the two MI commands..... > > regards > Klaus > > >> Hello list, >> >> does anybody have experience in configuring LCR (gw and lcr table) in >> the SQL database with siremis? >> >> I found a problem that inserting a gateway via the menu "LCR >> Gateways" is not possible without manual adaption in the database. It >> is no problem inserting LCR Rules; the entries are representing all >> columns of the SQL table "lcr". However, when I insert gateways that >> are linked over the so called 'group_id' to the LCR Rules I can not >> find any field in the WebGUI where I can put in a "lcr_id". >> And that is the problem. When insertion of rules and gateways is >> finished in the WebGUI I have to reload the lcr configuration e.g. >> with the MI command "lcr_reload". But this is not possible, because >> kamailio is displaying an error message, which looks like: >> >> 'ERROR: lcr [lcr_mod.c:1280]: gw grp_id<10> of prefix<2910> has no >> gateways' >> >> The reason of this error message is that the lcr_id of the table "gw" >> is set to 0 (hardcoded). So it does not match when the rules are >> inserted with another lcr_id (e.g. 1 instead of 0). >> >> => why is it possible to insert a free lcr_id in the menu "LCR >> Rules" but not in the menu "LCR Gateways"? If only lcr_id '0' is >> supported in general, then this id should be fix in the menu "LCR >> Rules", too. >> >> >> Am I wrong or does anybody else have an opinion to this topic? >> >> regards, >> Klaus >> >> >> >