Thank's Klaus,

now I understand how to use the extra_id_pv parameter... I already use the rtproxy_manage in branch_route to process every branch separately, but I was with difficult to understand how set extra_id_pv to every branch of forking. Your example helped me to eliminate my doubts (I think).

Best Regards

2013/5/3 Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at

Hi!

Disclaimer: I never used the 'b' parameter. comments inside

On 03.05.2013 15:44, Bruno Bresciani wrote:

...

Hi All again,

Somebody can help me about my doubts? I can't get understanding how set extra_id_pv parameter of the rtpproxy module... The documentation show the bellow line:

modparam("rtpproxy", "extra_id_pv", "$avp(extra_id)")

What means value "$avp(extra_id)"? I don't understand how set correctly a value to extra_id_pv parameter, maybe because I can't get understanding the meaning of "$avp(extra_id)".

Best Regards

2013/4/30 Bruno Bresciani <bruno.bresciani@gmail.com <mailto:bruno.bresciani@gmail.**com bruno.bresciani@gmail.com>>

Hi All,

I need forking a call to multiple destinations in paralel on
different network segments, requiring different rtpproxy parameters.
Reading the rtpproxy module documentation I discovered that is
possible by setting the "b" parameter on rtpproxy_manage(),
rtpproxy_offer(), rtpproxy_answer() and rtpproxy_destroy()
functions, but I'm with some doubts...

1. I guess you have to call in rtpproxy_manage in branch_route, to process

every branch separately

2. You need a unique identifier for every branch, e.g. increase a

global/transaction variable every branch_route exectution, or use another unique id, e.g.: $ru$du

3. I guess it should be used this way, eg:

branch_route[1] { $avp(extra_id)="$ru$du"; # should be unique rtpproxy_manage("b");

}

...

I can't understanding how set the extra_id_pv parameter correctly to
use when the "b" parameter is used.

The "b" parameter is supported on rtpproxy version 1.2.1?

I think (I may be wrong) this is transparent to rtpproxy. Usually the call-id is used as unique id. But as multiple branches have the same call-id, you have to extend the callid with some other unique ID. Thus, there is not support needed on rtpproxy side.

regards Klaus