I wonder if its caused from a process hanging even, do you do any external scripts, usrloc, or any kind of live db lookups? I do, we're in the process of nuking most of our external scripts because some just plain take too long and tend to hang up SER on a heavy day.. I would be more-so intertested in a module to deal with these 'slow' or runaway processes, just as a precautionary statement even. Of course that may be unneccesary in the eyes of the beholder :-)
Matt
-----Original Message----- From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:03 PM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions
Yes, that is what I'm afraid of. I do all stateful stuff with rr also.
I'm real concerned about this. I just thought that SER would kill off any pending transactions if when the delete_timer expires - so now I assume this is not what the delete_timer does.
I guess I just don't understand what could keep this alive. I've been watching my SER all day it the transaction is still there.
Regards, Paul
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:54:50 -0600, Matt Schulte mschulte@netlogic.net wrote:
Hmm, I get these too after long periods of time. I wonder if there was
a 487 or 408 that never got caught (or never replied to..??). I use all stateful too with rr, if that helps.
Matt-----Original Message----- From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 1:07 PM To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions
Hi All.
Occasionally I see a waiting transaction in "serctl moni". These waiting transactions never seem to get processed because they never disappear.
Can anyone give a hint as to why I might see such a thing?
Regards, Paul
[cycle #: 1773; if constant make sure server lives and fifo is on] Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.1 (i386/linux)) Now: Sat Mar 26 14:03:06 2005 Up Since: Fri Mar 25 21:14:41 2005 Up time: 60505 [sec]
Transaction Statistics Current: 0 (1 waiting) Total: 955 (0 local) Replied localy: 1066 Completion status 6xx: 0, 5xx: 0, 4xx: 301, 3xx: 0,2xx: 656
Stateless Server Statistics 200: 11568 202: 0 2xx: 0 300: 0 301: 0 302: 0 3xx: 0 400: 0 401: 2376 403: 8 404: 464 407: 31 408: 0 483: 0 4xx: 0 500: 0 5xx: 0 6xx: 0 xxx: 4707 failures: 0
UsrLoc Stats Domain Registered Expired 'location' 28 10 'aliases' 4 0
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
No external scripts, but I do use MySQL accounting and auth_db and uri_db. But I wouldn't think that's anything unusual.
I wonder if I can tell from some mysql tools if there is something hung.
Regards, Paul
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:19:35 -0600, Matt Schulte mschulte@netlogic.net wrote:
I wonder if its caused from a process hanging even, do you do any external scripts, usrloc, or any kind of live db lookups? I do, we're in the process of nuking most of our external scripts because some just plain take too long and tend to hang up SER on a heavy day.. I would be more-so intertested in a module to deal with these 'slow' or runaway processes, just as a precautionary statement even. Of course that may be unneccesary in the eyes of the beholder :-)
Matt-----Original Message----- From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:03 PM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions
Yes, that is what I'm afraid of. I do all stateful stuff with rr also.
I'm real concerned about this. I just thought that SER would kill off any pending transactions if when the delete_timer expires - so now I assume this is not what the delete_timer does.
I guess I just don't understand what could keep this alive. I've been watching my SER all day it the transaction is still there.
Regards, Paul
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:54:50 -0600, Matt Schulte mschulte@netlogic.net wrote:
Hmm, I get these too after long periods of time. I wonder if there was
a 487 or 408 that never got caught (or never replied to..??). I use all stateful too with rr, if that helps.
Matt-----Original Message----- From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 1:07 PM To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions
Hi All.
Occasionally I see a waiting transaction in "serctl moni". These waiting transactions never seem to get processed because they never disappear.
Can anyone give a hint as to why I might see such a thing?
Regards, Paul
[cycle #: 1773; if constant make sure server lives and fifo is on] Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.1 (i386/linux)) Now: Sat Mar 26 14:03:06 2005 Up Since: Fri Mar 25 21:14:41 2005 Up time: 60505 [sec]
Transaction Statistics Current: 0 (1 waiting) Total: 955 (0 local) Replied localy: 1066 Completion status 6xx: 0, 5xx: 0, 4xx: 301, 3xx: 0,2xx: 656
Stateless Server Statistics 200: 11568 202: 0 2xx: 0 300: 0 301: 0 302: 0 3xx: 0 400: 0 401: 2376 403: 8 404: 464 407: 31 408: 0 483: 0 4xx: 0 500: 0 5xx: 0 6xx: 0 xxx: 4707 failures: 0
UsrLoc Stats Domain Registered Expired 'location' 28 10 'aliases' 4 0
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Java Rockx wrote:
No external scripts, but I do use MySQL accounting and auth_db and uri_db. But I wouldn't think that's anything unusual.
I wonder if I can tell from some mysql tools if there is something hung.
Could this be a memory leak? I just looked at one of our servers and it shows 605 waiting.
Transaction Statistics Current: 0 (605 waiting) Total: 33826 (1 local)
I would love some feedback from Andrei, Jan, Jiri, Bogdan, Maxim. --- anyone.
This could be a real problem. I'm not even sure how to begin identifying this one.
I'm using ser-0.9.1 checked out of CVS yesterday.
What version are you using?
Regards, Paul
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:59:43 -0500, Andres andres@telesip.net wrote:
Java Rockx wrote:
No external scripts, but I do use MySQL accounting and auth_db and uri_db. But I wouldn't think that's anything unusual.
I wonder if I can tell from some mysql tools if there is something hung.
Could this be a memory leak? I just looked at one of our servers and it shows 605 waiting.
Transaction Statistics Current: 0 (605 waiting) Total: 33826 (1 local)
-- Andres Network Admin http://www.telesip.net
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Java Rockx wrote:
I would love some feedback from Andrei, Jan, Jiri, Bogdan, Maxim. --- anyone.
This could be a real problem. I'm not even sure how to begin identifying this one.
I'm using ser-0.9.1 checked out of CVS yesterday.
What version are you using?
ser-0.9.1 checked out a month ago. I looked at the archives and this question has come up before. Jiri answered it like this:
" It has currently no meaning -- this monitoring information has not been synchronized with change to transaction processing and displays useless value. Ignore it for now.
-jiri "
I guess that sums it up pretty well.
Thanks Andres. I'll sleep better tonight.
Regards, Paul
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:32:33 -0500, Andres andres@telesip.net wrote:
Java Rockx wrote:
I would love some feedback from Andrei, Jan, Jiri, Bogdan, Maxim. --- anyone.
This could be a real problem. I'm not even sure how to begin identifying this one.
I'm using ser-0.9.1 checked out of CVS yesterday.
What version are you using?
ser-0.9.1 checked out a month ago. I looked at the archives and this question has come up before. Jiri answered it like this:
" It has currently no meaning -- this monitoring information has not been synchronized with change to transaction processing and displays useless value. Ignore it for now.
-jiri "
I guess that sums it up pretty well.
-- Andres
-
Andres -
Java Rockx -
Matt Schulte