22 Sep
2006
22 Sep
'06
5:40 p.m.
Hello,
I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
either
rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
or
rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
This works fine.
Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a specific conf ?
thanx
Kostas
23 Sep
23 Sep
12:52 p.m.
Use rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
(If port is specified, DNS SRV is not used, ref. the RFC)
g-)
Kostas Marneris wrote:
Hello,
I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
either
rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
or
rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
This works fine.
Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a specific conf ?
thanx
Kostas
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
1:22 p.m.
or alternatively use rewritehostport but exclude the port number. I had
this problem and the bottom line is you cannot specify the port number
if you want to resolver to try and look for SRV records.
_Steve
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Use rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
(If port is specified, DNS SRV is not used, ref. the RFC)
g-)
Kostas Marneris wrote:
Hello,
I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
either
rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
or
rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
This works fine.
Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a specific
conf ?
thanx
Kostas
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
25 Sep
25 Sep
3:13 p.m.
thanks. This works Ok.
I have one more question :
My DNS SRV config is something like that :
$ORIGIN pstngw.foo.com.
_sip._udp SRV 1 1 5060 pstn1.foo.com.
SRV 1 1 5060 pstn2.foo.com.
I can load balance (50-50) with the above.
But if one of the GWs is down, then SER keeps on doing "load balancing 50-50" ,
so the ~50% of the calls are routed to GW that is down .
Is there a way to have a redundancy setup with DNS SRV only (with 50-50 load balancing) ?
Does this supported by SER's DNS SRV implementation (t_relay() ) ?
Or do I have to handle this issue with the t_on_failure() mechanism ?
thanx.
Kostas
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Use rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
(If port is specified, DNS SRV is not used, ref. the RFC)
g-)
Kostas Marneris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
> either
> rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
> or
> rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
>
> with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
> to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
> This works fine.
>
>
> Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a specific
> conf ?
>
>
> thanx
> Kostas
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
26 Sep
26 Sep
1:13 p.m.
SER's CVS HEAD version has this fetaure...I guess you would have to
use t_on_failure and such...
Samuel
2006/9/25, Kostas Marneris <K.Marneris(a)otenet.gr>gr>:
thanks. This works Ok.
I have one more question :
My DNS SRV config is something like that :
$ORIGIN pstngw.foo.com.
_sip._udp SRV 1 1 5060 pstn1.foo.com.
SRV 1 1 5060 pstn2.foo.com.
I can load balance (50-50) with the above.
But if one of the GWs is down, then SER keeps on doing "load balancing 50-50"
,
so the ~50% of the calls are routed to GW that is down .
Is there a way to have a redundancy setup with DNS SRV only (with 50-50 load balancing)
?
Does this supported by SER's DNS SRV implementation (t_relay() ) ?
Or do I have to handle this issue with the t_on_failure() mechanism ?
thanx.
Kostas
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Use rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
(If port is specified, DNS SRV is not used, ref. the RFC)
g-)
Kostas Marneris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
> either
> rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
> or
> rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
>
> with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
> to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
> This works fine.
>
>
> Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a specific
> conf ?
>
>
> thanx
> Kostas
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
29 Sep
29 Sep
4:59 p.m.
ok thanks .
Is there any way to combine DNS SRV and t_on_failure() ?
With rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com") SER sends DNS SRV queries, so load balance is
Ok.
How I know the first IP that SER sends the INVITE, so I can use the 2nd IP in
failure_route[1] block ?
I mean, something like that :
# --- PSTN Handler ---
...
if (uri =~ "^sip:XXXXXXXXXXXX@") {
rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
t_on_failure("1");
route(1);
break;
};
...
failure_route[1] {
if ((!t_check_status("487")) &&
(!t_check_status("486"))) {
rewritehostport("pstn2.foo.com:5060");
append_branch();
route(1);
break;
};
}
Is there any way to determine that SER tried that IP (pstn1-gw or pstn2-gw),
in order to use the other one ?
regards,
Kostas
samuel wrote:
SER's CVS HEAD version has this fetaure...I guess
you would have to
use t_on_failure and such...
Samuel
2006/9/25, Kostas Marneris <K.Marneris(a)otenet.gr>gr>:
> thanks. This works Ok.
>
> I have one more question :
> My DNS SRV config is something like that :
>
> $ORIGIN pstngw.foo.com.
> _sip._udp SRV 1 1 5060 pstn1.foo.com.
> SRV 1 1 5060 pstn2.foo.com.
>
> I can load balance (50-50) with the above.
>
> But if one of the GWs is down, then SER keeps on doing "load balancing
> 50-50" ,
> so the ~50% of the calls are routed to GW that is down .
>
>
> Is there a way to have a redundancy setup with DNS SRV only (with
> 50-50 load balancing) ?
> Does this supported by SER's DNS SRV implementation (t_relay() ) ?
>
> Or do I have to handle this issue with the t_on_failure() mechanism ?
>
>
> thanx.
> Kostas
>
> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> > Use rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
> > (If port is specified, DNS SRV is not used, ref. the RFC)
> > g-)
> >
> > Kostas Marneris wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
> >> either
> >> rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
> >> or
> >> rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
> >>
> >> with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
> >> to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
> >> This works fine.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a
specific
> >> conf ?
> >>
> >>
> >> thanx
> >> Kostas
> >> _______________________________________________
30 Sep
30 Sep
1:56 p.m.
Hi!
On Sep 29, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Kostas Marneris wrote:
How I know the first IP that SER sends the INVITE, so
I can use the
2nd IP in failure_route[1] block ?
Another approach would be to use the dispatcher module and specify
the IP addresses
on your own instead of using DNS.
Use Call-ID based distribution to set '0' containing the IPs for
gateways A, B, C in that
particular order.
Enable t_on_failure() and there use the same Call-Id based
distribution but with a changed
order of gateways, i.e. popping the first one and appending it to the
end so set '1'
would read B,C,A. That'll make sure for the same Call-ID a call will
always end up
on a different gateway for retries.
Cheers,
Hendrik
--
Hendrik Scholz <hscholz(a)raisdorf.net>
http://www.wormulon.net | http://wishlist.wormulon.net
2 Oct
2 Oct
11:30 a.m.
Kostas Marneris wrote:
ok thanks .
Is there any way to combine DNS SRV and t_on_failure() ?
With rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com") SER sends DNS SRV queries, so load
balance is Ok.
How I know the first IP that SER sends the INVITE, so I can use the 2nd
IP in failure_route[1] block ?
In ser CVS there was DNS cache and SRV failover support added recently.
It will do the failover automatically.
regards
klaus
I mean, something like that :
# --- PSTN Handler ---
...
if (uri =~ "^sip:XXXXXXXXXXXX@") {
rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
t_on_failure("1");
route(1);
break;
};
...
failure_route[1] {
if ((!t_check_status("487")) &&
(!t_check_status("486"))) {
rewritehostport("pstn2.foo.com:5060");
append_branch();
route(1);
break;
};
}
Is there any way to determine that SER tried that IP (pstn1-gw or
pstn2-gw),
in order to use the other one ?
regards,
Kostas
samuel wrote:
SER's CVS HEAD version has this fetaure...I
guess you would have to
use t_on_failure and such...
Samuel
2006/9/25, Kostas Marneris <K.Marneris(a)otenet.gr>gr>:
> thanks. This works Ok.
>
> I have one more question :
> My DNS SRV config is something like that :
>
> $ORIGIN pstngw.foo.com.
> _sip._udp SRV 1 1 5060 pstn1.foo.com.
> SRV 1 1 5060 pstn2.foo.com.
>
> I can load balance (50-50) with the above.
>
> But if one of the GWs is down, then SER keeps on doing "load
> balancing 50-50" ,
> so the ~50% of the calls are routed to GW that is down .
>
>
> Is there a way to have a redundancy setup with DNS SRV only (with
> 50-50 load balancing) ?
> Does this supported by SER's DNS SRV implementation (t_relay() ) ?
>
> Or do I have to handle this issue with the t_on_failure() mechanism ?
>
>
> thanx.
> Kostas
>
> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> > Use rewritehost("pstngw.foo.com");
> > (If port is specified, DNS SRV is not used, ref. the RFC)
> > g-)
> >
> > Kostas Marneris wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I run ser.0.9.6 and I can use
> >> either
> >> rewritehostport("1.2.3.4:5060");
> >> or
> >> rewritehostport("pstngw.foo.com:5060");
> >>
> >> with t_relay() command on INVITE/PSTN handler in order
> >> to route calls to a Cisco PSTN GW.
> >> This works fine.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is "DNS SRV queries" supported on ser.0.9.6 and is there a
specific
> >> conf ?
> >>
> >>
> >> thanx
> >> Kostas
> >> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6439
days inactive
6449
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Hendrik Scholz -
Klaus Darilion -
Kostas Marneris -
samuel -
Steve Blair