27 Mar
2012
27 Mar
'12
3:14 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf" and "append_hf" one
after the other , twice, issue”, I tried to work with the “append_branch()”
function.
What I need to do is, after I received the invite from the original user,
I use SIP methods to work with the NP server. I subst() the user part, send
the call to the NP server, get the reply, parse it and then subst() back to
the destination and send the call out.
Doing it with “append_branch” seems logical.
I do “append_branch()” before changing the user, get the reply (301),
goes on to failure route after the branch route was called, and from there
I have a problem.
I need to continue my flow without the branch I added. How do I return to
the original on?
I read about the t_drop_replies but didn’t quit understand…..
BR,
Uri
27 Mar
27 Mar
3:36 p.m.
New subject: branches usage
Hi,
try the following:
route {
# Whatever you do in your main-route....
t_on_branch("modify_contact");
# Whatever you do in your main-route, the branch route is
automatically triggered for each branch.
t_relay();
}
branch_route[modify_contact] {
remove_hf("Contact");
append_hf("Contact: sip:whatever@something\r\n");
}
failure_route[failure_from_np] {
# You need to modify the triggered branch_route again, otherwise the
same branch_route will triggered again...
}
Just calling "append_branch" does not help.
Carsten
2012/3/27 Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
--
Meet ng-voice at LinuxTag 2012 in Berlin - May 23rd - 26th, 2012. Save the
date!
Hi,
Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf" and "append_hf" one
after the other , twice, issue”, I tried to work with the “append_branch()”
function.
What I need to do is, after I received the invite from the original user,
I use SIP methods to work with the NP server. I subst() the user part, send
the call to the NP server, get the reply, parse it and then subst() back to
the destination and send the call out.
Doing it with “append_branch” seems logical.
I do “append_branch()” before changing the user, get the reply (301),
goes on to failure route after the branch route was called, and from there I
have a problem.
I need to continue my flow without the branch I added. How do I return to
the original on?
I read about the t_drop_replies but didn’t quit understand…..
BR,
Uri
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
4:46 p.m.
New subject: branches usage
In my case i need to change the header and then send it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and got
the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is sent...
am i wrong?
There are many questions to ask about the branches... when do they work in
a serial manner, when parallel... where can i find it documented best?
Hi,
try the following:
route {
# Whatever you do in your main-route....
t_on_branch("modify_contact");
# Whatever you do in your main-route, the branch route is
automatically triggered for each branch.
t_relay();
}
branch_route[modify_contact] {
remove_hf("Contact");
append_hf("Contact: sip:whatever at
something<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users&…
\r\n");
}
failure_route[failure_from_np] {
# You need to modify the triggered branch_route again, otherwise the
same branch_route will triggered again...
}
Just calling "append_branch" does not help.
Carsten
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi,
Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf" and "append_hf"
one after the other , twice, issue”, I tried to work with the
“append_branch()” function.
What I need to do is, after I received the invite from the original user,
I use SIP methods to work with the NP server. I subst() the user part, send
the call to the NP server, get the reply, parse it and then subst() back to
the destination and send the call out.
Doing it with “append_branch” seems logical.
I do “append_branch()” before changing the user, get the reply (301),
goes on to failure route after the branch route was called, and from there
I have a problem.
I need to continue my flow without the branch I added. How do I return to
the original on?
I read about the t_drop_replies but didn’t quit understand…..
BR,
Uri
4:55 p.m.
New subject: branches usage
Hi Uri,
you're wrong.
"t_on_branch" works before the request is sent out....
The branches work in the manner, you program them in your logic (e.g.
set the timeout for a request, then use failure route for serial
branches). There is no general switch (and i'm not aware of any good
docs regarding this) in order to do serial or parallel branches.
Carsten
2012/3/27 Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com>om>:
In my case i need to change the header and then send
it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and got
the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is sent...
am i wrong?
There are many questions to ask about the branches... when do they work in a
serial manner, when parallel... where can i find it documented best?
Hi,
try the following:
route {
# Whatever you do in your main-route....
t_on_branch("modify_contact");
# Whatever you do in your main-route, the branch route is
automatically triggered for each branch.
t_relay();
}
branch_route[modify_contact] {
remove_hf("Contact");
append_hf("Contact: sip:whatever at something\r\n");
}
failure_route[failure_from_np] {
# You need to modify the triggered branch_route again, otherwise the
same branch_route will triggered again...
}
Just calling "append_branch" does not help.
Carsten
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
--
Meet ng-voice at LinuxTag 2012 in Berlin - May 23rd - 26th, 2012. Save the
date!
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf" and "append_hf" one
after the other , twice, issue”, I tried to work with the “append_branch()”
function.
What I need to do is, after I received the invite from the original user,
I use SIP methods to work with the NP server. I subst() the user part, send
the call to the NP server, get the reply, parse it and then subst() back to
the destination and send the call out.
Doing it with “append_branch” seems logical.
I do “append_branch()” before changing the user, get the reply (301),
goes on to failure route after the branch route was called, and from there I
have a problem.
I need to continue my flow without the branch I added. How do I return to
the original on?
I read about the t_drop_replies but didn’t quit understand…..
BR,
Uri
5:03 p.m.
New subject: branches usage
Are you searching for examples of serial / parallel forking config found in
the TM module documentation ?
Reda
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:55, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote:
Hi Uri,
you're wrong.
"t_on_branch" works before the request is sent out....
The branches work in the manner, you program them in your logic (e.g.
set the timeout for a request, then use failure route for serial
branches). There is no general switch (and i'm not aware of any good
docs regarding this) in order to do serial or parallel branches.
Carsten
2012/3/27 Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
--
Meet ng-voice at LinuxTag 2012 in Berlin - May 23rd - 26th, 2012. Save the
date!
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
In my case i need to change the header and then
send it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and got
the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is
sent...
am i wrong?
There are many questions to ask about the branches... when do they work
in a
serial manner, when parallel... where can i find
it documented best?
Hi,
try the following:
route {
# Whatever you do in your main-route....
t_on_branch("modify_contact");
# Whatever you do in your main-route, the branch route is
automatically triggered for each branch.
t_relay();
}
branch_route[modify_contact] {
remove_hf("Contact");
append_hf("Contact: sip:whatever at something\r\n");
}
failure_route[failure_from_np] {
# You need to modify the triggered branch_route again, otherwise the
same branch_route will triggered again...
}
Just calling "append_branch" does not help.
Carsten
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf" and
"append_hf"
one
>> after the other , twice, issue”, I tried
to work with the
“append_branch()”
>> function.
>>
>> What I need to do is, after I received the invite from the original
user,
>> I use SIP methods to work with the NP
server. I subst() the user part,
send
>> the call to the NP server, get the reply,
parse it and then subst()
back to
>> the destination and send the call out.
>>
>> Doing it with “append_branch” seems logical.
>>
>> I do “append_branch()” before changing the user, get the reply (301),
>> goes on to failure route after the branch route was called, and from
there
I
>> have a problem.
>>
>> I need to continue my flow without the branch I added. How do I return
to
the original on?
I read about the t_drop_replies but didn’t quit understand…..
BR,
Uri
5:22 p.m.
New subject: branches usage
Hi,
On 03/27/2012 04:46 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
In my case i need to change the header and then send
it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and
got the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is
sent... am i wrong?
There are many questions to ask about the branches... when do they work
in a serial manner, when parallel... where can i find it documented best?
Actually it's quite simple. If a request comes in and you modify it in a
normal route (e.g. calling rtpproxy_offer(), uac_replace_from(), adding
additional headers and stuff like that) and you send it out using e.g.
t_relay(), then in a serial scenario when you re-enter via a
failure-route, these changes will still be there (which is not always
what you want).
On the other hand, if you register a branch route via t_on_branch() and
do your changes there instead of prior to calling t_relay(), then these
changes from branch route will be rolled back, and you can do your
changes easily again in the same or another branch route starting with
your original message. This is important for example in serial call
forward scenarios, where the first destination might require an
rtpproxy, but the second doesn't, or when the first destination requires
different custom headers compare to the second.
Basically the same applies to parallel scenarios. If you modify your
message before calling lookup() and you've multiple contacts registered
for your destination, then your changes will apply for all branches
which are created by that. However if you move your modifications to a
branch route, then you can work on your messages individually, depending
on the branch.
Hope this clarifies it a bit.
Andreas
4420
days inactive
4420
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andreas Granig -
Carsten Bock -
Reda Aouad -
Uri Shacked