7 Apr
2005
7 Apr
'05
8:21 a.m.
Your right, I must have been tired when I thought it was working. This doesn't work
unless there's something that has to be done with branches additionally
-----Original Message-----
From: Tina [mailto:kramarv@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:55 PM
To: Evan "Borgström
Cc: Greger V. Teigre; Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] still no help - usrloc synchronization - bug in replication?
Unfortunately this does not work. It sends the message to the ser2 2 times and won't
send to ser4....(see below)
if (isflagset(...)) {
rewritehostport("192.168.25.139:5060");
append_branch();
t_replicate("192.168.25.115","5060");
log(1, "replicated to 139 n 115===\n");
};
===========192.168.25.113:5060 -> 192.168.25.103:5060
REGISTER sip:192.168.25.103 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.25.113:5060;rport;b
ranch=z9hG4bK0D463F2A700A45A6BB50ADC7E5DFAE71..From: matuka <sip:tuka@192.168.25.
103>;tag=1369320418..To: matuka <sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>..Contact:
"matuka" <sip
:tuka@192.168.25.113:5060>..Call-ID: 5E3468B20AF142938FC6D5069BC203D6(a)192.168.25.
103..CSeq: 50582 REGISTER..Expires: 60..Max-Forwards: 70..User-Agent: X-Lite rele
ase 1103m..Content-Length: 0....
#
T 192.168.25.103:23 -> 192.168.25.113:2469 [AP]
4(2829) REGISTER++++fixing contact and port....Fix contact: Insert buf - sip:tuk
a@192.168.25.113:5060..
#
U 192.168.25.103:5060 -> 192.168.25.113:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.25.113:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0D4
63F2A700A45A6BB50ADC7E5DFAE71..From: matuka
<sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>;tag=1369320
418..To: matuka
<sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>;tag=5607c0bdebf2a92111742e4bf83280c3.c1
3f..Call-ID: 5E3468B20AF142938FC6D5069BC203D6@192.168.25.103..CSeq: 50582 REGISTE
R..Contact: <sip:tuka@192.168.25.113:5060>;q=0.00;expires=60..Content-Length:
0..
Warning: 392 192.168.25.103:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2829 req_src_ip=192.
168.25.113 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:192.168.25.103 out_uri=sip:192.168.25.103
via_cnt==1"....
#
U 192.168.25.103:5060 -> 192.168.25.115:5060
REGISTER sip:192.168.25.139:5060 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.25.103;branch=
z9hG4bK2a77.fafffe65.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.25.113:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9
hG4bK0D463F2A700A45A6BB50ADC7E5DFAE71..From: matuka
<sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>;tag
=1369320418..To: matuka <sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>..Contact: "matuka"
<sip:tuka@19
2.168.25.113:5060>..Call-ID: 5E3468B20AF142938FC6D5069BC203D6@192.168.25.103..CSe
q: 50582 REGISTER..Expires: 60..Max-Forwards: 69..User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103
m..Content-Length: 0....
#
U 192.168.25.103:5060 -> 192.168.25.115:5060
REGISTER sip:192.168.25.139:5060 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.25.103;branch=
z9hG4bK2a77.fafffe65.1..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.25.113:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9
hG4bK0D463F2A700A45A6BB50ADC7E5DFAE71..From: matuka
<sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>;tag
=1369320418..To: matuka <sip:tuka@192.168.25.103>..Contact: "matuka"
<sip:tuka@19
2.168.25.113:5060>..Call-ID: 5E3468B20AF142938FC6D5069BC203D6@192.168.25.103..CSe
q: 50582 REGISTER..Expires: 60..Max-Forwards: 69..User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103
m..Content-Length: 0....
Evan Borgström <evan.borgstrom(a)ca.mci.com> wrote:
It's just the way that t_register works, if you call t_relay_to more
than once the same error will occur... It's quite messy, you probably
have to use append_branch like;
save("location");
rewritehostport("ser2.domain.com:5060");
append_branch();
rewritehostport("ser3.domain.com:5060");
append_branch();
t_replicate("ser4.domain.com:5060");
I haven't tested this but the logic should work since the t_replicate
function just calls t_relay_to. Also, you'll probably want to use
save_noreply() on the hosts processing the replicated register messages
otherwise the host replicating the register will spew errors. Like I
said, messy.
You could probably do it more elegantly using avpops similar to the
trusted ip example in the docs.
-Evan
Tina wrote:
Yep, it didn't help
*/REGISTER++++fixing contact and port/*
*/Fix contact: Insert buf - sip:tuka@192.168.25.113:5060
6(1305) ERROR: t_newtran: transaction already in process 0x28361068
/*
*/"Greger V. Teigre" /* wrote:
The error means that t_newtran has been run while an
existing transaction is still in the workings. Have you tried
moving your save() to *before* the t_replicate()?
g-)
---- Original Message ----
From: Tina
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org ; greger(a)teigre.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 05:00 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] still no help - usrloc synchronization
_____
Do you Yahoo!?
Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=27808/*http://personals.yahoo.com>
Thanks a lot, gentelmens!
I have jumped to the same conclusion. The only thing I am worried -
t_replicate() creates aditional SIP traffic between sers. And I also
get some strange error with each REGISTER:
1(712) ERROR: t_newtran: transaction already in process 0x28336768
Don't have any idea what I am doing wrong....
Below is my ser.cfg snippet.
As far as you see I am using mediaproxy package to solve NAT issues.
I always force relay, cause I had nathelper problems with
UAC1->ser->NAT->UAC2 configuration.
I am going to test new mediaproxy release.
BRs,
Tina
< BR>> ============================
. . .
# ------------------------- request routing logic
-------------------
# main routing logic
route{
#-------------------------------------------------------
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
#-------------------------------------------------------????????????????????
# loose-route processing
if (loose_route()) {
route(8); #--go to mediaproxy processing
break;
};
...
if (method=="REGISTER") {
#------Replicate to the peers
#---Ser 1
if (!src_ip==192.168.25.103)
t_replicate("192.168.25.103","5060");
#---Ser 2
if (!src_ip==192.168.25.115)
t_replicate("192.168.25.115","5060");
save ("location");
break;
};
#-----------------------------------------------INVITE
if (method=="INVITE") {
log (1, "INVITE: Radius Accounting\n");
t_on_failure("4"); #---voice mail
use_media_proxy();
t_on_reply("5"); #--mediaproxy
};
#--------------------------------------------------BYE
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
log (1, "BYE or CANCEL: Radius Accounting\n");
};
#---------------------------------------------------
if (!lookup("location") && !lookup("aliases")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
#-------------------------------------------------------
failure_route[4]{
if (t_check_status("408|486")){
append_hf("P-hint: Rewrited to VM");
rewritehostport("192.168.25.116:5060");
append_branch();
t_relay();
break;
};
}
#---------------------------------------------------------
onreply_route[5]{
if (status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]" && !search("^Content-Length:\
0")) {
if ( (!(src_ip=="SERVER1"))
&& (!(src_ip=="SERVER2"))
&& (!(src_ip=="SERVER3")) ){
if ( search("c=IN IP4 192.168.*")||search("c=IN IP4
10.*")||search("c=IN IP4 172.16.*") ) {
fix_contact();
};
};
use_media_proxy();
}
}
===================================================
Matt Schulte wrote:
I'm starting to lean this direction, using t_replicate and all. I
could
never get usrloc (db mode) to function properly.. t_replicate is a
dirty
but very effective workaround.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 1:33 AM
To: kramarv(a)yahoo.com
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] still no help - usrloc synchronization
Have a look at this thread:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-January/014669.html
g-)
Java Rockx wrote:
more.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Tina,
& gt;
I thought I saw you post the other day that you
did not want to use
t_replicate(), however, this is probably your best bet to getting
this
> to work, IMHO.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> On Apr 1, 2005 4:08 PM, Tina wrote:>>
>> Hi, please help me, I'm stuck with it!!!!!
>> I am trying to set up several sers with a shared MySQL database for
>> location service.
>>
>> I set in each ser.cfg:
>>
>> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
>> modparam("usrloc",
>> "db_url","sql://ser:heslo@192.168.25.163/ser")
>>
>> and the servers are not synchronized.
>> The I set
>> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
>>
>>
>> made UAC (Xlite) register to one of the servers.
>> ; I see it via usrloc, but there is no record in "location" mySQL
>> table....So others do not see the client and I'm unable to make
>> calls....
>>
>>
>> Please help how to work with usrloc and mySQL...
>>
> Tina,
>> software engineer
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn
7135
days inactive
7135
days old
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Matt Schulte