22 Mar
2006
22 Mar
'06
11:22 a.m.
Hi all,
I am trying to implement the following scenario:
Whenever a NATed client calls to user at public IP or whenever a user at public IP calls
a NATed client, I dont want to use mediaproxy. the fix_nated_sdp function does the job.
But when both the caller and callee are behind nat, only then mediaproxy should be used.
Can someone please help me in defining a condition which will return true if both the
caller and callee are nated.
I tried a lot, but my conditions allow calls from NATed client to public IP clients to
use mediaproxy which I dont want.
Please help me in this regard, as I want to minimise the use of mediaproxy as much as
possible.
Thanks in advance,
jayesh
---------------------------------
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
23 Mar
23 Mar
4:35 p.m.
Hi,
this is a topic largely discussed in the past - a google on the archive
will give you a lot of info.
shortly, you have to you avp_check() to compare the src_ip of the INVITE
with the destination of it (dst_uri). See the avpops and the pseudo
variables docs.
regards,
bogdan
Jayesh Nambiar wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to implement the following scenario:
Whenever a NATed client calls to user at public IP or whenever a user
at public IP calls a NATed client, I dont want to use mediaproxy. the
fix_nated_sdp function does the job.
But when both the caller and callee are behind nat, only then
mediaproxy should be used. Can someone please help me in defining a
condition which will return true if both the caller and callee are nated.
I tried a lot, but my conditions allow calls from NATed client to
public IP clients to use mediaproxy which I dont want.
Please help me in this regard, as I want to minimise the use of
mediaproxy as much as possible.
Thanks in advance,
jayesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/in/mailcricket/*http://in.sports.yahoo.com/cricket/>
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/in/mailmobilemessenger/*http://in.mobile.yahoo.com/new/messenger/>
Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
24 Mar
24 Mar
6:10 a.m.
Hi Bogdan,
the solution you gave was to detect if caller and callee are behind same NAT, I just
wanted to detect if caller and calee are behind "NAT". Can you help me in
defining condition for this.
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi,
this is a topic largely discussed in the past - a google on the archive
will give you a lot of info.
shortly, you have to you avp_check() to compare the src_ip of the INVITE
with the destination of it (dst_uri). See the avpops and the pseudo
variables docs.
regards,
bogdan
Jayesh Nambiar wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to implement the following scenario:
Whenever a NATed client calls to user at public IP or whenever a user
at public IP calls a NATed client, I dont want to use mediaproxy. the
fix_nated_sdp function does the job.
But when both the caller and callee are behind nat, only then
mediaproxy should be used. Can someone please help me in defining a
condition which will return true if both the caller and callee are nated.
I tried a lot, but my conditions allow calls from NATed client to
public IP clients to use mediaproxy which I dont want.
Please help me in this regard, as I want to minimise the use of
mediaproxy as much as possible.
Thanks in advance,
jayesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile
Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
---------------------------------
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
10:27 a.m.
Hi,
in this case, you may see if the caller is behind the nat by using
nat_uac_test() function; to see if the callee is register from behind a
nat ,after doing lookup("location"), test the NAT flag of register (note
that at registration time - save() - you have to set this flag -if
nated- to be saved into location table).
regards,
bogdan
Jayesh Nambiar wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
the solution you gave was to detect if caller and callee are behind
*same NAT*, I just wanted to detect if caller and calee are behind
"NAT". Can you help me in defining condition for this.
*/Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro>/* wrote:
Hi,
this is a topic largely discussed in the past - a google on the
archive
will give you a lot of info.
shortly, you have to you avp_check() to compare the src_ip of the
INVITE
with the destination of it (dst_uri). See the avpops and the pseudo
variables docs.
regards,
bogdan
Jayesh Nambiar wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to implement the following scenario:
Whenever a NATed client calls to user at public IP or whenever a
user
at public IP calls a NATed client, I dont want to
use
mediaproxy. the
fix_nated_sdp function does the job.
But when both the caller and callee are behind nat, only then
mediaproxy should be used. Can someone please help me in defining a
condition which will return true if both the caller and callee
are nated.
I tried a lot, but my conditions allow calls from
NATed client to
public IP clients to use mediaproxy which I dont want.
Please help me in this regard, as I want to minimise the use of
mediaproxy as much as possible.
Thanks in advance,
jayesh
6876
days inactive
6878
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Jayesh Nambiar