25 Jun
2005
25 Jun
'05
7:05 p.m.
Hi all I have been looking at the debugs in order to try to figure out
If I'm doing something wrong at my SER.CFG
I have the following:
UA ----> SER -----> B2BUA -----> SER ------> PSTN-GW
1. The user agent place a call to the SER proxy.
2. SER Proxy receives the call and forwads to B2BUA (VOCAL at the same
server using UDP port 5065)
3. B2BUA receives the calls activates the Billing supervision and Sends
an invite for a new call to the SER.
4. SER receives the call from the B2BUA and rewrite host and port to the
PSTN-GW.
5. PSTN-GW receives the invite from the SER and sends back the ACK.
6. Inmediatly from some reason SER is sending a BYE to the call.
I'm attaching a debug from the SER and my SER.CFG file
Could anybody help me please?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: method: <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: uri: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK-46d68929>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=9
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [42];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>^M ]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to
16
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=316
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: find_first_route: No Route headers found
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: loose_route: There is no Route HF
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 &&
[sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 &&
[sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 &&
[sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 &&
[sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: Hey this request is NOT from B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: FORWARDING TO B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: check_via_address(200.67.33.247, 172.31.253.127, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: Sending: INVITE sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com
SIP/2.0^M Record-Route:
<sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060;nat=yes;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Via:
SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=60425;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-46d68929^M From:
8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>^M Call-ID:
b5fcf1e1-baf4a709(a)172.31.253.127^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Max-Forwards: 16^M Contact:
8183651723 <sip:8183651723@200.67.33.247:60425>^M Expires: 240^M User-Agent:
Linksys/PAP2-2.0.12(LS)^M Content-Length: 316^M Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE,
NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER^M Supported: x-sipura^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M P-hint:
PASANDO POR EL B2BUA^M P-hint: APLICO NAT AL B2BUA^M ^M v=0^M o=- 23012599 23012599 IN IP4
172.31.253.127^M s=-^M c=IN IP4 172.31.253.127^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16458 RTP/AVP 18 0 4 8
100 101^M a=rtpmap:18 G729a/8000^M a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/800
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: orig. len=884, new_len=1105, proto=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: method: <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: uri: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: end of header reached, state=9
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [42];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>^M ]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 16
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=33554432
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=316
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: find_first_route: No Route headers found
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: loose_route: There is no Route HF
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=33554432
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=9 , global msg id=1 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=60
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=21902, isACK=0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DBG: trans=0x4057c048, callback type 1, id 0 entered
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: SER: new INVITE
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x810fe78: SIP/2.0 1...,
shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: _reply_light: finished
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x4057c160
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x4057c170
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: SER: new transaction fwd'ed
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: status: <100>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: reason: <Trying>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=12 global id=2 T start=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967
branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=12 global id=12 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=100, uac[0]=0
local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100,
new_code=100
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[1]: 0x4057c170
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:32 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x4057c160 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: status: <183>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: reason: <Session Progress>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=6 global id=2 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967
branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=6 global id=6 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=100, uac[0]=100
local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100,
new_code=183
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: old size: 752, new size: 698
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:89, new: 35,
rest: 663 msg= SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From:
8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005
13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server:
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M
Content-Type: application/sdp^M Content-Disposition: session;handling=required^M
Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4
200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN
IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x810f708: SIP/2.0 1...,
shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 1
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[1]: 0x4057c170
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=11 global id=0 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967
branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=11 global id=11 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=183, uac[0]=183
local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=183,
new_code=200
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: old size: 886, new size: 832
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:75, new: 21,
rest: 811 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005
13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server:
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK,
PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Contact:
<sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060>^M Record-Route:
<sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M
Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4
200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN
IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: update_totag_set: new totag
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x4057c090
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x8110388: SIP/2.0 2...,
shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 2
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: method: <ACK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: uri: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK-76d2bc25>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK!
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2cbe59e2
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [55];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<ACK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to
16
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: is_preloaded: No
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: find_next_route: No next Route HF found
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: after_strict: No next URI found
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: PASE POR AQUI POR QUE NO SOY CANCEL, INVITE O REGISTER
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: LOOKUP LOCATION PARA CUALQUIER COSA
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:1,tl=0x4057c170 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=2 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967
branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=14 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=200, uac[0]=200
local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=200,
new_code=200
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DBG: t_should_relay_response: 200 INV after final sent
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: old size: 886, new size: 832
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:75, new: 21,
rest: 811 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005
13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server:
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK,
PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Contact:
<sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060>^M Record-Route:
<sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M
Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4
200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN
IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: update_totag_set: totag retransmission
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x8110218: SIP/2.0 2...,
shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 2
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=13 global id=12 T
start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101>
<INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967
branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=13 global id=13 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=200, uac[0]=200
local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=200,
new_code=200
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DBG: t_should_relay_response: 200 INV after final sent
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: old size: 886, new size: 832
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:75, new: 21,
rest: 811 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005
13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server:
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK,
PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Contact:
<sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060>^M Record-Route:
<sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M
Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4
200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN
IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: update_totag_set: totag retransmission
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x81102a8: SIP/2.0 2...,
shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 2
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: method: <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: uri: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2cbe59e2
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [55];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102>
<BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to
16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: is_preloaded: No
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: find_next_route: No next Route HF found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: after_strict: No next URI found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: Hey this request is NOT from B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: FORWARDING TO B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: check_via_address(200.67.33.247, 172.31.253.127, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=33554432
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: check_via_address(200.67.33.247, 172.31.253.127, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: Sending: BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060 SIP/2.0^M
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=0^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=60425;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef^M From:
8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2cbe59e2^M Call-ID:
b5fcf1e1-baf4a709(a)172.31.253.127^M CSeq: 102 BYE^M Max-Forwards: 16^M User-Agent:
Linksys/PAP2-2.0.12(LS)^M Content-Length: 0^M P-hint: finishing call^M P-hint: PASANDO POR
EL B2BUA^M P-hint: APLICO NAT AL B2BUA^M ^M .
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: orig. len=425, new_len=600, proto=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <0>;
state=16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=8 global id=2 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 235, <rport> = <60425>;
state=6
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 234, <received> =
<200.67.33.247>; state=6
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: this is the second via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2cbe59e2
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [55];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102>
<BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: failure to match a transaction
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=8 global id=8 T end=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=2
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: old size: 436, new size: 392
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:60, new: 16,
rest: 376 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=60425;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2cbe59e2^M From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M Call-ID:
b5fcf1e1-baf4a709(a)172.31.253.127^M CSeq: 102 BYE^M Record-Route:
<sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Length: 0^M ^M
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: update_sock_struct_from_via: using 'rport'
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: update_sock_struct_from_via: using 'received'
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: update_sock_struct_from_via: trying SRV lookup
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: reply forwarded to 172.31.253.127:5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: method: <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: uri: <sip:200.94.75.6;lr=on>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102>
<BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to
16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: is_preloaded: No
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.1] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 &&
[200.94.75.1] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: check_self: host != me
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: after_strict: Next hop:
'sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060' is strict router
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: TOI: rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with
'sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060'
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: has_totag: totag found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=15 , global msg id=14 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=60
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=21899, isACK=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DBG: trans=0x40579e98, callback type 1, id 0 entered
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x40579fb0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x40579fc0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: SER: new transaction fwd'ed
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: status: <481>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: reason: <Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bKb855.107310d2.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=13 T
start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60];
uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: to body
[<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102>
<BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21899 label 755054337
branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x40579e98)!
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=14 T end=0x40579e98
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0
local=0 is_invite=0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0,
new_code=481
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: old size: 372, new size: 318
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:108, new: 54,
rest: 264 msg= SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To:
<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Call-ID:
5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M CSeq: 102 BYE^M Content-Length: 0^M ^M
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x40579ee0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x810f708: SIP/2.0 4...,
shmem=0x4057d8d8: SIP/2.0 4
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:51 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0x40579fc0 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:51 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x40579fb0 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x4057c090 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x4057c048 from table
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: delete transaction 0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : done
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x40579ee0 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x40579e98 from table
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: delete transaction 0x40579e98
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : done
#
# $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.25.2.1 2005/02/18 14:30:44 andrei Exp $
#
# simple quick-start config script
#
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=5 # debug level (cmd line: -ddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=no
/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
fork=no
log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)
debug=7
*/
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
listen=200.94.75.6
port=5060
alias=200.94.75.6
alias=sipsrv.conecta-te.com
fifo_mode=0666
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/group.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/group_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mediaproxy.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
# modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("domain", "db_mode", 1)
modparam("usrloc|domain", "db_url",
"mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
#
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# -- Radius Configuration --
modparam("auth_radius", "radius_config",
"/usr/local/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("auth_radius", "service_type", 15)
modparam("group_radius", "radius_config",
"/usr/local/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("group_radius", "use_domain", 0)
# -- nathelper params --
modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable", 1)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 0)
# -- mediaproxy params --
modparam("mediaproxy", "natping_interval", 30)
modparam("mediaproxy", "mediaproxy_socket",
"/var/run/mediaproxy.sock")
modparam("mediaproxy", "sip_asymmetrics",
"/usr/local/etc/ser/sip-clients")
modparam("mediaproxy", "rtp_asymmetrics",
"/usr/local/etc/ser/rtp-clients")
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
#----------------------------------------------
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
#----------------------------------------------
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len > max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
#----------------------------------------------------
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
# subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
# use different transport protocol
#----------------------------------------------------
if (method=="INVITE" && client_nat_test("3")){
record_route_preset("200.94.75.6:5060;nat=yes");
}else if (!method=="REGISTER"){
record_route();
};
#---------------------------------------------
# we tear down the call before entering to loose route
#---------------------------------------------
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call\r\n");
};
#-------------------------------------------------
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
#-------------------------------------------------
if (loose_route()) {
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
# The following lines are added due media proxy
if (has_totag() && (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK")) {
if (client_nat_test("3") || search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")) {
# Mark as NAT'ed
setflag(6);
use_media_proxy();
};
};
# end media session for BYE and CANCEL is done above
# before entering the loose route. no need to call it here
route(1);
break;
};
#----------------------------------------
# processing the most common sip messages
# for all the calls
#----------------------------------------
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
if (uri==myself) {
#---------------------------------
#all the calls from the sip uacs should
#be handled by the b2bua for authorization
#and accounting
#---------------------------------
if (!(src_ip==200.94.75.6 || src_ip==200.94.75.1)and(method=="INVITE" ||
method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")) {
log("Hey this request is NOT from B2BUA\n");
log("Forwarding to B2BUA\n");
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
forward(200.94.75.6,5065);
break;
};
if (method=="CANCEL" || method=="INVITE") {
route(3);
break;
} else if (method=="REGISTER") {
route(2);
break;
};
route(4);
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found");
break;
};
};
route(1);
}
route[1] {
#-------------------------------
# Default SIP message handler
# forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that
# works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP
#------------------------------
t_on_reply("1");
if (!t_relay()) {
if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call no-relay\r\n");
};
sl_reply_error();
};
}
route[2] {
#---------------------------
# "REGISTER" message handler
#---------------------------
sl_send_reply("100", "Trying");
if (!search("^Contact:\ +\*") && client_nat_test("7")) {
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
if (is_from_local() || uri==myself) {
if (!radius_www_authorize("")) {
www_challenge("", "0");
break;
} else if (!check_to()){
sl_send_reply("403", "Username!=To not allowed");
break;
};
if (!save("location")) {
sl_reply_error();
};
} else {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
sl_send_reply("403", "This domain is not served here");
};
}
route[3] {
#--------------------------
#"CANCEL" and "INVITE" message handler
#--------------------------
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
if (method=="INVITE") {
if (!(is_from_local() || uri==myself || is_uri_host_local())) {
sl_send_reply("403", "Relaying is forbidden");
break;
};
} else if (method=="CANCEL") {
route(1);
break;
};
route(4);
if (!lookup("location")) {
if ((uri=~"sip:01[1-9][0-9]+@.*") || (uri=~"sip:00[1-9][0-9]+@.*"))
{
rewritehost("200.94.75.1");
};
} else {
sl_send_reply("404", "User not found");
break;
};
#-------------------------------------
#RTP Proxy handler
#-------------------------------------
if (isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) {
use_media_proxy();
append_hf("P-hint: are you nated?\r\n");
};
route(1);
}
route[4] {
#---------------
#we need to check for the alias
#---------------
lookup("aliases");
if (uri!=myself) {
route(1);
break;
};
}
failure_route[1] {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call on failure\r\n");
}
onreply_route[1] {
if ((isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) &&
(status=~"(180)|(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])")) {
if (client_nat_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
if (!search("^Content-Length:\ +0")) {
use_media_proxy();
append_hf("P-hint: use nat for call\r\n");
};
};
}
26 Jun
26 Jun
6:34 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
Does anybody know if the following behavior is a bug?
UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.67.33.247:61133
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
G4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.67.33.247:61133
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 200.67.33.247:61133 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 200.67.33.247:61133 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.67.33.247:5060 !!!!
The UDP PORT was changed !!!!
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK with
the right UDP PORT
U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 200.67.33.247:61133 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
I'm using
version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
Regards
Alberto Cruz
11:07 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
Hi Alberto!
The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its Via:
header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the via header.
As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport(). Then,
ser will add the port from which it received the message (61133) and
will use this prot for responses.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
Does anybody know if the following behavior is a bug?
UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133*
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
G4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133
*SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:5060
!!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
*The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK with
the right UDP PORT*
U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
I'm using
version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
Regards
Alberto Cruz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5:54 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
So should I have to give the same treatment to method=="CANCEL" as
method=="BYE"?
i.e.:
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Alberto!
The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its Via:
header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the via header.
As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport(). Then,
ser will add the port from which it received the message (61133) and
will use this prot for responses.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
Does anybody know if the following behavior is a
bug?
UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133*
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
G4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133
*SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:5060
!!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
*The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK
with the right UDP PORT*
U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
I'm using
version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
Regards
Alberto Cruz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:15 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
I already tried this sending the BYE to the CANCEL&INVITE route block
but I still have the same behavior.
the "TEAR DOWN" block is ending the MEDIA SESSION and the CALL; isn't it?
Where should I apply the force_rport() command ?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Alberto Cruz wrote:
So should I have to give the same treatment to
method=="CANCEL" as
method=="BYE"?
i.e.:
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Alberto!
The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its Via:
header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the via
header. As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport(). Then,
ser will add the port from which it received the message (61133) and
will use this prot for responses.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
Does anybody know if the following behavior is a
bug?
UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133*
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
G4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133
*SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:5060
!!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
*The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK
with the right UDP PORT*
U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
I'm using
version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
Regards
Alberto Cruz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:30 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
Probably the BYE is processed in the loose_route block.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
I already tried this sending the BYE to the
CANCEL&INVITE route block
but I still have the same behavior.
the "TEAR DOWN" block is ending the MEDIA SESSION and the CALL; isn't it?
Where should I apply the force_rport() command ?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Alberto Cruz wrote:
So should I have to give the same treatment to
method=="CANCEL" as
method=="BYE"?
i.e.:
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Alberto!
The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its Via:
header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the via
header. As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport(). Then,
ser will add the port from which it received the message (61133) and
will use this prot for responses.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
Does anybody know if the following behavior is a
bug?
UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133*
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
G4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133
*SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 101 INVITE.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 101 ACK.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:5060
!!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
*The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK
with the right UDP PORT*
U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
From: 8183651723
<sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
CSeq: 102 BYE.
I'm using
version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
Regards
Alberto Cruz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:42 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
This the section that you are talking about at my ser.cfg:
#---------------------------------------------
# we tear down the call before entering to loose route
#---------------------------------------------
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call\r\n");
};
#-------------------------------------------------
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
#-------------------------------------------------
if (loose_route()) {
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
# The following lines are added due media proxy
if (has_totag() && (method=="INVITE" ||
method=="ACK")) {
if (client_nat_test("3") ||
search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")) {
# Mark as NAT'ed
setflag(6);
use_media_proxy();
};
};
# end media session for BYE and CANCEL is done above
# before entering the loose route. no need to call it here
route(1);
break;
};
So do you suggest I have to add and option for the BYE at the
loose_route to use_media_proxy again?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Probably the BYE is processed in the loose_route
block.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
I already tried this sending the BYE to the
CANCEL&INVITE route block
but I still have the same behavior.
the "TEAR DOWN" block is ending the MEDIA SESSION and the CALL; isn't
it?
Where should I apply the force_rport() command ?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Alberto Cruz wrote:
So should I have to give the same treatment to
method=="CANCEL" as
method=="BYE"?
i.e.:
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Alberto!
The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its Via:
header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the via
header. As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport().
Then, ser will add the port from which it received the message
(61133) and will use this prot for responses.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
> Does anybody know if the following behavior is a bug?
>
> UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 ->
> *200.67.33.247:61133*
> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
>
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
> G4bK-bb14d3a0.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133
> *SIP/2.0 200 OK.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
>
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* ->
> 200.94.75.6:5060
> ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> CSeq: 101 ACK.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
> ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
> Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> CSeq: 101 ACK.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* ->
> 200.94.75.6:5060
> BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
> BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
> Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
> e.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 ->
> *200.67.33.247:5060 !!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>
> *The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK
> with the right UDP PORT*
>
> U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* ->
> 200.94.75.6:5060
> BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
> From: 8183651723
> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>
> I'm using
> version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
> DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> @(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
> main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
>
> and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
>
> I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
>
> Regards
>
> Alberto Cruz
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7:19 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?
Thank you very much Klaus for your help. :-)
I added the following to the loose_route section and now everything is ok
if ((method=="BYE") &&
((client_nat_test("3")||search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")))) {
force_rport();
};
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Alberto Cruz wrote:
This the section that you are talking about at my
ser.cfg:
#---------------------------------------------
# we tear down the call before entering to loose route
#---------------------------------------------
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call\r\n");
};
#-------------------------------------------------
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
#-------------------------------------------------
if (loose_route()) {
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
# The following lines are added due media proxy
if (has_totag() && (method=="INVITE" ||
method=="ACK")) {
if (client_nat_test("3") ||
search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")) {
# Mark as NAT'ed
setflag(6);
use_media_proxy();
};
};
# end media session for BYE and CANCEL is done above
# before entering the loose route. no need to call it here
route(1);
break;
};
So do you suggest I have to add and option for the BYE at the
loose_route to use_media_proxy again?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Probably the BYE is processed in the loose_route
block.
regards,
klaus
Alberto Cruz wrote:
I already tried this sending the BYE to the
CANCEL&INVITE route
block but I still have the same behavior.
the "TEAR DOWN" block is ending the MEDIA SESSION and the CALL;
isn't it?
Where should I apply the force_rport() command ?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Alberto Cruz wrote:
So should I have to give the same treatment to
method=="CANCEL" as
method=="BYE"?
i.e.:
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi Alberto!
>
> The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its
> Via: header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the
> via header. As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
>
> You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport().
> Then, ser will add the port from which it received the message
> (61133) and will use this prot for responses.
>
> regards,
> klaus
>
> Alberto Cruz wrote:
>
>> Does anybody know if the following behavior is a bug?
>>
>> UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 ->
>> *200.67.33.247:61133*
>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
>>
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
>> G4bK-bb14d3a0.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 ->
>> *200.67.33.247:61133
>> *SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0.
>>
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* ->
>> 200.94.75.6:5060
>> ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> CSeq: 101 ACK.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
>> ACK sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>> Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> CSeq: 101 ACK.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* ->
>> 200.94.75.6:5060
>> BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
>> BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>> Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
>> e.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 ->
>> *200.67.33.247:5060 !!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>>
>> *The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200
>> OK with the right UDP PORT*
>>
>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* ->
>> 200.94.75.6:5060
>> BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>> From: 8183651723
>> <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>> To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7(a)172.31.253.127.
>> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>>
>> I'm using
>> version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
>> DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>> @(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
>> main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
>>
>> and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
>>
>> I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Alberto Cruz
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
8:20 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SEMS with Radius and mysql
I note that anyone can help me on ser + radius configuration problem !
My ser work fine with radius server. Accounting is ok.
But there are 2 problem:
Problem 1)
Free Mediaproxy not work with Radius. Is there another?
Problem 2)
SEMS module and SER Status
My ser and (radius+mysql) are on two separate servers.
It's necessary to install mysql also on ser server for know ser-status?
HOW i can call this procedure modparam("voicemail",
"db_url","sql://ser:heslo@dbhost/ser")
in sems configuration file, if mysq is not installed on ser server? (sems is
installed with ser on the same server)
Please help me !
30 Jun
30 Jun
1:41 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SEMS with Radius and mysql
Problem 1)
I have tried SER+MEDIAPROXY sending accounting to a 3rd Party RADIUS
server and it works ok. Maybe you are missing something.
Regards
Alberto Cruz
a cairo wrote:
I note that anyone can help me on ser + radius
configuration problem !
My ser work fine with radius server. Accounting is ok.
But there are 2 problem:
Problem 1)
Free Mediaproxy not work with Radius. Is there another?
Problem 2)
SEMS module and SER Status
My ser and (radius+mysql) are on two separate servers.
It's necessary to install mysql also on ser server for know ser-status?
HOW i can call this procedure modparam("voicemail", "db_url","
sql://ser:heslo@dbhost/ser" <mailto:heslo@dbhost/ser%22>)
in sems configuration file, if mysq is not installed on ser server?
(sems is installed with ser on the same server)
Please help me !
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
3:47 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SEMS with Radius and mysql
I'm tried but it don't work. Documentation specify that radius support is
implemented in commercial version! Can help me?
Thanks
Antonello
-----Original Message-----
From: Alberto Cruz <acruz(a)tekbrain.com>
To: a cairo <a.cairo(a)scsitalia.it>
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:41:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SEMS with Radius and mysql
Problem 1)
I have tried SER+MEDIAPROXY sending accounting to a 3rd Party RADIUS server
and it works ok. Maybe you are missing something.
Regards
Alberto Cruz
a cairo wrote:
I note that anyone can help me on ser + radius configuration problem !
My ser work fine with radius server. Accounting is ok.
But there are 2 problem:
Problem 1)
Free Mediaproxy not work with Radius. Is there another?
Problem 2)
SEMS module and SER Status
My ser and (radius+mysql) are on two separate servers.
It's necessary to install mysql also on ser server for know ser-status?
HOW i can call this procedure modparam("voicemail", "db_url","
sql://ser:heslo@dbhost/ser")
in sems configuration file, if mysq is not installed on ser server? (sems is
installed with ser on the same server)
Please help me !
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6 Jul
6 Jul
8:50 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] PSTN call receives a bye after 5 seconds usingSER+B2BUA+MEDIAPROXY
Hi
the debug is really hard to read, but u seem to be getting 200OK after
the call is in place, and then the BYE, can u run ngrep and pull out
just the call transaction debug
Iqbal
On 6/25/2005, "Alberto Cruz" <acruz(a)tekbrain.com> wrote:
Hi all I have been looking at the debugs in order to
try to figure out
If I'm doing something wrong at my SER.CFG
I have the following:
UA ----> SER -----> B2BUA -----> SER ------> PSTN-GW
1. The user agent place a call to the SER proxy.
2. SER Proxy receives the call and forwads to B2BUA (VOCAL at the same
server using UDP port 5065)
3. B2BUA receives the calls activates the Billing supervision and Sends
an invite for a new call to the SER.
4. SER receives the call from the B2BUA and rewrite host and port to the
PSTN-GW.
5. PSTN-GW receives the invite from the SER and sends back the ACK.
6. Inmediatly from some reason SER is sending a BYE to the call.
I'm attaching a debug from the SER and my SER.CFG file
Could anybody help me please?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
9:34 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] TO header
Hi all,
Some of our pstn providers uses the TO header of an Invite to make a call.
For example I call 00321231231, i need to strip the two leadings 0.
If i don't do the same on the TO header, the providers are unable to forward
the call to pstn.
When i modify the TO header, i have problems for some Uas and also have to
replace the TO header for ACKs and BYEs.
But now, it seems that doesn't work with some user-agents, unhappy to find a
TO header different of the TO the send...
Any good idea?
Olivier
9:52 p.m.
New subject: RE : [Serusers] TO header
Good idea, but in the meanwhile, I need a solution...
Is it Rfc compliant to have 3221231231 in the Invite and 003221231231 in the
TO
Users uses to prefix with 00 for international, and I don't want to disturb
then, I know that if I don't use 00, everytings works well.
Same for local calls, users don't use to prefix the number with
country-code, I then add country code for them.
The pity is that I have to do that in the TO header...
Olivier
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 6 juillet 2005 21:46
À : Olivier Taylor
Cc : serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Objet : [Serusers] TO header
Olivier Taylor writes:
Any good idea?
junk such pstn service providers. they obviously don't have a clue how sip
works.
-- juha
9:55 p.m.
New subject: RE : [Serusers] TO header
The RFC dont care about the To header content. But it is simply not RFC
compliant to change the To header!
Nils
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 21:52, Olivier Taylor wrote:
Good idea, but in the meanwhile, I need a solution...
Is it Rfc compliant to have 3221231231 in the Invite and 003221231231 in
the TO
Users uses to prefix with 00 for international, and I don't want to disturb
then, I know that if I don't use 00, everytings works well.
Same for local calls, users don't use to prefix the number with
country-code, I then add country code for them.
The pity is that I have to do that in the TO header...
Olivier
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 6 juillet 2005 21:46
À : Olivier Taylor
Cc : serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Objet : [Serusers] TO header
Olivier Taylor writes:
Any good idea?
junk such pstn service providers. they obviously don't have a clue how sip
works.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
9:56 p.m.
New subject: RE : [Serusers] TO header
Olivier Taylor writes:
Is it Rfc compliant to have 3221231231 in the Invite
and 003221231231 in the
TO
yes, if is rfc compliant to have in r-uri 3221231231 and in to
sip:foo@bar.com. for example, user could forward calls to
sip:foo@bar.com to 3221231231.
-- juha
11:21 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] TO header
Oliver,
The from/to/callid in the header are the 'key' for the dialog.
None can be changed. You will have to either:
1) use a b2bua to rewrite the from/to tags (try asterisk)
2) remove the 00 from the initial INVITE from your client.
Technically, the PSTN gateway should ignore the To tag and use
the RURI to route the call. I don't think the To tag (or the From tag)
mean anything useful. Who is the PSTN provider? Does the name start
with an 'L'?
WARNING: Most things I say are only half write :-)
-g
On 7/6/05, Olivier Taylor <olivier.taylor(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Some of our pstn providers uses the TO header of an Invite to make a call.
For example I call 00321231231, i need to strip the two leadings 0.
If i don't do the same on the TO header, the providers are unable to forward
the call to pstn.
When i modify the TO header, i have problems for some Uas and also have to
replace the TO header for ACKs and BYEs.
But now, it seems that doesn't work with some user-agents, unhappy to find a
TO header different of the TO the send...
Any good idea?
Olivier
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Greg Fausak
greg(a)thursday.com
7 Jul
7 Jul
1:22 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] TO header
if u can let us know who they are, once thy know enuff people think they
r no good they might change
Iqbal
On 7/6/2005, "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Olivier Taylor writes:
Any good idea?
junk such pstn service providers. they obviously don't have a clue how
sip works.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6894
days inactive
6905
days old
18 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
a cairo -
Alberto Cruz -
Greg Fausak -
Iqbal -
Juha Heinanen -
Klaus Darilion -
Nils Ohlmeier -
Olivier Taylor