25 Jun
2004
25 Jun
'04
6:56 p.m.
Hi,
The functions;
setflag()
restflag()
isflagset()
Do these functions set a flag identified by the numeric argument, or do
they set one specific flag to the value of the argument?
I'm sure it is the former, but the docs are not that clear to me on this.
Also, if I update the docs, where is the best place for me to submit
changes to? Shall I just email the sgml diffs to the serdev list?
All the best,
-Jev
25 Jun
25 Jun
7:12 p.m.
You're right!
The are several flags (flag 1, flag 2, flag 3, ...) which can be 0 or 1.
regards,
klaus
Jev wrote:
Hi,
The functions;
setflag()
restflag()
isflagset()
Do these functions set a flag identified by the numeric argument, or do
they set one specific flag to the value of the argument?
I'm sure it is the former, but the docs are not that clear to me on this.
Also, if I update the docs, where is the best place for me to submit
changes to? Shall I just email the sgml diffs to the serdev list?
All the best,
-Jev
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
26 Jun
26 Jun
12:14 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bad Config File error if changing for using mysql
Hi,
In ser.cfg I am just uncommenting lines mentioned for using MySql
support and authentication. But when I try to restart SER, it is giving
me bad cfg file error.
What to do??
Also I want to register Ubiquity UA with SER. How to do that???
Rgds-
Vanita Jain
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Jev
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 9:56 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] setflag() clarification
Hi,
The functions;
setflag()
restflag()
isflagset()
Do these functions set a flag identified by the numeric argument, or do
they set one specific flag to the value of the argument?
I'm sure it is the former, but the docs are not that clear to me on
this.
Also, if I update the docs, where is the best place for me to submit
changes to? Shall I just email the sgml diffs to the serdev list?
All the best,
-Jev
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
11:20 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Bad Config File error if changing for using mysql
I would be very helpful to add the "bad" lines to your Email. Anyway, I
guess it is because of a bad parameter: Try mysql:// instead of sql://
Klaus
Vanita Jain wrote:
Hi,
In ser.cfg I am just uncommenting lines mentioned for using MySql
support and authentication. But when I try to restart SER, it is giving
me bad cfg file error.
What to do??
Also I want to register Ubiquity UA with SER. How to do that???
Rgds-
Vanita Jain
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Jev
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 9:56 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] setflag() clarification
Hi,
The functions;
setflag()
restflag()
isflagset()
Do these functions set a flag identified by the numeric argument, or do
they set one specific flag to the value of the argument?
I'm sure it is the former, but the docs are not that clear to me on
this.
Also, if I update the docs, where is the best place for me to submit
changes to? Shall I just email the sgml diffs to the serdev list?
All the best,
-Jev
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
27 Jun
27 Jun
1:22 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
-g
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
10:35 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
Greg,
We experienced similer problems when we tried to parallelly fork calls thru our PSTN
gateway. All the calls had same call-id, and the only difference was the branch-id's
in the via headers of the forked calls. The gateway accepted only the first call and
rejected others. I asked about this in the sipping forum, and was informed that it could
be a bug in the implementation of the UA server (PSTN gateways are UAS). The UAS has to
consider branch-id's for the transactions. AFAIK, for a proxy, it is the combination
of the Call-ID and the tags that uniquely identify the dialog. (Request others to correct
if i am wrong on this). Not sure what exactly is your problem.
Regards,
Greg Fausak <greg(a)addabrand.com> wrote:
I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
-g
Greg Fausak
Girish Gopinath <gr_sh2003(a)yahoo.com>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
11:42 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
On Jun 26, 2004 at 18:22, Greg Fausak <greg(a)addabrand.com> wrote:
I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
What do you mean by non-unique call id? Is it changing during the call?
(the call id is supposed to change for each new call)
Andrei
4:10 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
What I mean is that the call-id is used for multiple dialogs.
It isn't unique for different calls. So, if my UAC makes a call, hangs
up,
then makes another call, both calls have the same call-id, the
ACC accounting is showing that the same call ID is being used over
and over. Is this a UAC bug?
---greg
On Jun 27, 2004, at 4:42 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jun 26, 2004 at 18:22, Greg Fausak
<greg(a)addabrand.com> wrote:
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
What do you mean by non-unique call id? Is it changing during the call?
(the call id is supposed to change for each new call)
Andrei
10:44 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
This should not happen:
Rfc3261: 8.1.1.4
In a new request created by a UAC outside of any dialog, the Call-ID
header field MUST be selected by the UAC as a globally unique
identifier over space and time unless overridden by method-specific
behavior. All SIP UAs must have a means to guarantee that the Call-
ID header fields they produce will not be inadvertently generated by
any other UA.
Maybe your accounting problem can be solved by using not only the
call-id as identifier, but also the to-tag and the from-tag. These
should also change for new dialogs.
regards,
klaus
Greg Fausak wrote:
What I mean is that the call-id is used for multiple
dialogs.
It isn't unique for different calls. So, if my UAC makes a call, hangs up,
then makes another call, both calls have the same call-id, the
ACC accounting is showing that the same call ID is being used over
and over. Is this a UAC bug?
---greg
On Jun 27, 2004, at 4:42 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jun 26, 2004 at 18:22, Greg Fausak
<greg(a)addabrand.com> wrote:
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
What do you mean by non-unique call id? Is it changing during the call?
(the call id is supposed to change for each new call)
Andrei
28 Jun
28 Jun
5:17 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
So, what if a UA generates a non-unique call-id?
shut down the user_id?
Thanks for the hint on the unique key :-)
-g
On Jun 27, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
This should not happen:
Rfc3261: 8.1.1.4
In a new request created by a UAC outside of any dialog, the Call-ID
header field MUST be selected by the UAC as a globally unique
identifier over space and time unless overridden by method-specific
behavior. All SIP UAs must have a means to guarantee that the Call-
ID header fields they produce will not be inadvertently generated by
any other UA.
Maybe your accounting problem can be solved by using not only the
call-id as identifier, but also the to-tag and the from-tag. These
should also change for new dialogs.
regards,
klaus
Greg Fausak wrote:
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
What I mean is that the call-id is used for
multiple dialogs.
It isn't unique for different calls. So, if my UAC makes a call,
hangs up,
then makes another call, both calls have the same call-id, the
ACC accounting is showing that the same call ID is being used over
and over. Is this a UAC bug?
---greg
On Jun 27, 2004, at 4:42 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jun 26, 2004 at 18:22, Greg Fausak
<greg(a)addabrand.com> wrote:
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
What do you mean by non-unique call id? Is it changing during the
call?
(the call id is supposed to change for each new call)
Andrei
7:16 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
The UA is grandstream.
I've just enabled totag/fromtag in the ACC: output, I'll take
a look at that to see if some uniqueness can be derived.
Thanks,
-g
On Jun 28, 2004, at 6:20 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Greg Fausak wrote:
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
So, what if a UA generates a non-unique call-id?
shut down the user_id?
That would be a possibillity. But first I would ask the user to update
his equipment. Which UA is it?
klaus
27 Jun
27 Jun
7:21 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
a guess -- it it grandstream? use from and to tags to make accounting
key unique.
-jiri
At 01:22 AM 6/27/2004, Greg Fausak wrote:
I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
-g
Greg Fausak
www.AddaBrand.com
(US) 469-546-1265
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
11:46 a.m.
On Jun 25, 2004 at 09:56, Jev <jev(a)ecad.org> wrote:
Hi,
The functions;
setflag()
restflag()
isflagset()
Do these functions set a flag identified by the numeric argument, or do
they set one specific flag to the value of the argument?
I'm sure it is the former, but the docs are not that clear to me on this.
Also, if I update the docs, where is the best place for me to submit
changes to? Shall I just email the sgml diffs to the serdev list?
Yes.
Thanks,
Andrei
7268
days inactive
7271
days old
13 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
GR S -
Greg Fausak -
Jev -
Jiri Kuthan -
Klaus Darilion -
Vanita Jain