Hello,
I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority.
By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 2
After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060 ;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060 ;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } }
The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)")
And the code which should do the displatch is the following:
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } }
With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively.
Thanks a lot, Cristian
Hello,
can you sent pcap or ngrep output with all sip messages of such case exposing the issue you have?
Cheers, Daniel
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin < cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority.
By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 2
After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060; transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060; transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } }
The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)")
And the code which should do the displatch is the following:
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } }With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively.
Thanks a lot, Cristian
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Daniel,
I attached a pcap trace. It contains several SIP messages, but please check the INVITEs from 10.224.74.36 (Kamailio) to 10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51.
Thanks for you support, Cristian
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
can you sent pcap or ngrep output with all sip messages of such case exposing the issue you have?
Cheers, Daniel
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin < cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority.
By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 2
After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060 ;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060 ;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } }
The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)")
And the code which should do the displatch is the following:
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } }With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively.
Thanks a lot, Cristian
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Daniel,
Did you got the chance to look at the trace attached? I still not managed to figure out why failover is not working in my Kamailio configuration..
Thank you, Cristian
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Cristi Constantin < cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I attached a pcap trace. It contains several SIP messages, but please check the INVITEs from 10.224.74.36 (Kamailio) to 10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51.
Thanks for you support, Cristian
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
can you sent pcap or ngrep output with all sip messages of such case exposing the issue you have?
Cheers, Daniel
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin < cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority.
By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060;transport=sctp 9 2
After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060 ;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060 ;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } }
The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)")
And the code which should do the displatch is the following:
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } }With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively.
Thanks a lot, Cristian
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
I was traveling during the past two weeks and didn't have the time to look properly at it. Hopefully today or tomorrow I will get to it.
Cheers, Daniel
On 29.05.17 23:14, Cristi Constantin wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Did you got the chance to look at the trace attached? I still not managed to figure out why failover is not working in my Kamailio configuration..
Thank you, Cristian
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel, I attached a pcap trace. It contains several SIP messages, but please check the INVITEs from 10.224.74.36 (Kamailio) to 10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51 <http://10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51>. Thanks for you support, Cristian On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, can you sent pcap or ngrep output with all sip messages of such case exposing the issue you have? Cheers, Daniel On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com <mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority. By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060 <http://10.126.54.51:5060>;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060 <http://10.126.55.51:5060>;transport=sctp 9 2 After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060 <http://10.126.55.51:5060>;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060 <http://10.126.54.51:5060>;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } } The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)") And the code which should do the displatch is the following: if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } } With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively. Thanks a lot, Cristian _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
That's great. Thanks a lot.
Best regards, Cristian
On 5/30/17, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was traveling during the past two weeks and didn't have the time to look properly at it. Hopefully today or tomorrow I will get to it.
Cheers, Daniel
On 29.05.17 23:14, Cristi Constantin wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Did you got the chance to look at the trace attached? I still not managed to figure out why failover is not working in my Kamailio configuration..
Thank you, Cristian
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel, I attached a pcap trace. It contains several SIP messages, but please check the INVITEs from 10.224.74.36 (Kamailio) to 10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51 <http://10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51>. Thanks for you support, Cristian On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, can you sent pcap or ngrep output with all sip messages of such case exposing the issue you have? Cheers, Daniel On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com <mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority. By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060 <http://10.126.54.51:5060>;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060 <http://10.126.55.51:5060>;transport=sctp 9 2 After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060 <http://10.126.55.51:5060>;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060 <http://10.126.54.51:5060>;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } } The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)") And the code which should do the displatch is the following: if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } } With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively. Thanks a lot, Cristian _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-usershttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
I looked at the code and all seems ok there -- the first destination is selected to be used first.
Can you print $(avp(AVP_DST)[*]) after ds_select_dst(...)? Like:
xlog("selected destinations: $(avp(AVP_DST)[*])\n");
Send the log message after doing three test calls.
Cheers, Daniel
On 30.05.17 13:18, Cristi Constantin wrote:
That's great. Thanks a lot.
Best regards, Cristian
On 5/30/17, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was traveling during the past two weeks and didn't have the time to look properly at it. Hopefully today or tomorrow I will get to it.
Cheers, Daniel
On 29.05.17 23:14, Cristi Constantin wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Did you got the chance to look at the trace attached? I still not managed to figure out why failover is not working in my Kamailio configuration..
Thank you, Cristian
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel, I attached a pcap trace. It contains several SIP messages, but please check the INVITEs from 10.224.74.36 (Kamailio) to 10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51 <http://10.126.54.51/10.126.55.51>. Thanks for you support, Cristian On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, can you sent pcap or ngrep output with all sip messages of such case exposing the issue you have? Cheers, Daniel On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com <mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, I have an issue with the behavior of ds_select_dst() method in case of using algorithm 8 (dispatch based on priority). In case both destinations are available, they are used alternatively, instead of always using the one with the highest priority. By searching through the mailing list I found that the lower the priority number, the higher the priority (1 is first, 2 is second, etc.). Based on this, I set the following in dispatcher.list: 7 sip:10.126.54.51:5060 <http://10.126.54.51:5060>;transport=sctp 9 1 7 sip:10.126.55.51:5060 <http://10.126.55.51:5060>;transport=sctp 9 2 After running "kamcmd dispatcher.reload" and "kamcmd dispatcher.list", I have the confirmation that the priorities are correctly set: SET: { ID: 7 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.55.51:5060 <http://10.126.55.51:5060>;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 2 } DEST: { URI: sip:10.126.54.51:5060 <http://10.126.54.51:5060>;transport=sctp FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 1 } } } The dispatcher settings from kamailio.cfg is the following: modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@sdp-t-lb2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(AVP_SOCK)") And the code which should do the displatch is the following: if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } } With the settings above, I was expecting to always have the messages delivered to 10.126.54.51. Instead, they are dispathed to 10.126.54.51 and 10.126.55.51 alternatively. Thanks a lot, Cristian _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-usershttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
Hello all,
just recently discover Kamailio and trying to improve my asterisk boxes with it. Just want a simple thing to start:
- load balancing
- distributed states ( for bliking lamps only )
can you guys point me some directions where to start?
thank you
On Thursday 01 June 2017 16:45:15 Luís Torres wrote:
Hello all,
just recently discover Kamailio and trying to improve my asterisk boxes with it. Just want a simple thing to start:
- load balancing
Um, load balancing what?
SIP registrations? Dial plan / call setup? Audio / call flow?
- distributed states ( for bliking lamps only )
Which version of Asterisk are you starting from?
Antony.
Hi Antony,
For begining is only to balance the Sip Regs between the two Asterisk 13.14.0 boxes cause Im sharing the diaplan through dundi. But I want to have BLF between the phones random registered .
thank you
Em 2017-06-01 16:50, Antony Stone escreveu:
On
Thursday 01 June 2017 16:45:15 Luís Torres wrote:
Hello all, just
recently discover Kamailio and trying to improve my asterisk boxes with it. Just want a simple thing to start: - load balancing
Um, load
balancing what?
SIP registrations? Dial plan / call setup?
Audio / call flow?
- distributed states ( for bliking lamps only
)
Which version of Asterisk are you starting from?
Antony.
*For begining is only to balance the Sip Regs between the two Asterisk 13.14.0 boxes*
Check out kamailio dispatcher module: https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html
Thanks :) manage to put it loadbalancing
And presence server to share phone states like BLF, is it possible?
Em 2017-06-01 19:40, Mititelu Stefan escreveu:
For begining is only to balance the Sip
Regs between the two Asterisk 13.14.0 boxes
Check out kamailio
dispatcher module: https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html [2]
Kamailio (SER) -
Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users [1]
Links: ------ [1] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users [2] https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html
Hello,
look at presence_dialoginfo and pua_dialoginfo modules.
Cheers, Daniel
On 05.06.17 16:04, Luís Torres wrote:
Thanks :) manage to put it loadbalancing
And presence server to share phone states like BLF, is it possible?
Em 2017-06-01 19:40, Mititelu Stefan escreveu:
/For begining is only to balance the Sip Regs between the two Asterisk 13.14.0 boxes /
Check out kamailio dispatcher module: https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin cristi.constantin@gmail.com wrote:
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } }
I might be off, but what exactly is this line good for?
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) {
As I understand the documentation, you are checking whether the request URI of your packet is in the dispatcher set for group 7. But unless you modify $ru somewhere above this snippet to match one of the entries of your dispatcher set 7, this if statement should never evaluate to "true", so the ds_select_dst("7", "8") is never evaluated.
Maybe your call gets dispatched by some other part of your main route?
Regards, Sebastian
Hello Sebastian, Daniel,
Please excuse me for the late response, I had few days off.
You are right, Sebastian. After adding several log messages, I figured out the messages were dispatched in other part of the routing code. The problem is fixed now and the dispatcher failover mechanism is working as expected.
Thank you very much, Cristian
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Sebastian Damm damm@sipgate.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin cristi.constantin@gmail.com wrote:
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { remove_hf("Route"); if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } }I might be off, but what exactly is this line good for?
if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) {As I understand the documentation, you are checking whether the request URI of your packet is in the dispatcher set for group 7. But unless you modify $ru somewhere above this snippet to match one of the entries of your dispatcher set 7, this if statement should never evaluate to "true", so the ds_select_dst("7", "8") is never evaluated.
Maybe your call gets dispatched by some other part of your main route?
Regards, Sebastian
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
ok, good that it was sorted out and nothing broken inside dispatcher module...
Cheers, Daniel
On 07.06.17 07:50, Cristi Constantin wrote:
Hello Sebastian, Daniel,
Please excuse me for the late response, I had few days off.
You are right, Sebastian. After adding several log messages, I figured out the messages were dispatched in other part of the routing code. The problem is fixed now and the dispatcher failover mechanism is working as expected.
Thank you very much, Cristian
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Sebastian Damm <damm@sipgate.de mailto:damm@sipgate.de> wrote:
Hi, On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Cristi Constantin <cristi.constantin@gmail.com <mailto:cristi.constantin@gmail.com>> wrote: > if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { > remove_hf("Route"); > if(!ds_select_dst("7", "8")) { > send_reply("404", "No destination"); > exit; > } > } I might be off, but what exactly is this line good for? > if (ds_is_from_list(7, 3, "$ru")) { As I understand the documentation, you are checking whether the request URI of your packet is in the dispatcher set for group 7. But unless you modify $ru somewhere above this snippet to match one of the entries of your dispatcher set 7, this if statement should never evaluate to "true", so the ds_select_dst("7", "8") is never evaluated. Maybe your call gets dispatched by some other part of your main route? Regards, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Antony Stone -
Cristi Constantin -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Luís Torres -
Mititelu Stefan -
Sebastian Damm