18 Jan
2003
18 Jan
'03
2:06 a.m.
This works with my eStara soft phone client:
--------------cut
# route[1], REGISTER block
# REGISTER messages destined for our realm are forwarded here.
# after a successful registration a customer can receive calls.
#
route[1]
{
if(!www_authorize("augustvoice.net", "subscriber"))
{
www_challenge("augustvoice.net", "0");
break;
};
log("here is a register");
if(!save("location"))
{
sl_reply_error();
};
break;
}
---------------uncut
However, when I try to get my Cisco 7960 to authorize it fails. I've appended
the ngrep trace of the failed transaction. The only difference I can see is
that the line argument algorithm=MD5 is in the WWW-Authenticate line.
Do I have to do something special to accept a MD5 password???
---greg
Greg Fausak
ngrep trace:
--------cut
#
U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060
REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT.
CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>.
Expires: 3600.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2313.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net",
nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72", algorithm=MD5.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2262
req_src_ip=216.87.128.66 in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1".
.
#
U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060
REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT.
CSeq: 102 REGISTER.
Authorization: Digest
username="2424377",realm="augustvoice.net",uri="sip:64.90.42.25",response="039cee96c9321217973c4914314fc3ed",nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72",algorithm=MD5.
Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>.
Expires: 3600.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2581.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
CSeq: 102 REGISTER.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net",
nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72", algorithm=MD5.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2263
req_src_ip=216.87.128.66 in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1".
.
18 Jan
18 Jan
10:27 a.m.
I don't have a quick reply to what the problem in your setting could be
-- we haven't encountered any problems with 7960 authentication yet.
Some few suggestions you may want to verify follow. The first few
may sound too trivial, but I just want to be safe not to miss them
-- sometimes strange things happen sometimes when people work too hard :)
- is the password really correct?
- is the route[1] really entered for Cisco messages too?
If that is none of these trivial errors, it may be worth trying if
things change when you use qop/authentication (the second paramterer
of www_authorize changed to "1") and/or replace www_{authorize|challenge}
with proxy_{authorize|challenge}.
Other possible issues might have popped up, if you changed use of plain-text
credentials to hashed credentials -- if that is the case, let me know.
-jiri
At 02:06 AM 1/18/2003, Greg Fausak wrote:
This works with my eStara soft phone client:
--------------cut
# route[1], REGISTER block
# REGISTER messages destined for our realm are forwarded here.
# after a successful registration a customer can receive calls.
#
route[1]
{
if(!www_authorize("augustvoice.net", "subscriber"))
{
www_challenge("augustvoice.net", "0");
break;
};
log("here is a register");
if(!save("location"))
{
sl_reply_error();
};
break;
}
---------------uncut
However, when I try to get my Cisco 7960 to authorize it fails. I've appended
the ngrep trace of the failed transaction. The only difference I can see is
that the line argument algorithm=MD5 is in the WWW-Authenticate line.
Do I have to do something special to accept a MD5 password???
---greg
Greg Fausak
ngrep trace:
--------cut
#
U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060
REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT.
CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>.
Expires: 3600.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2313.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net",
nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72", algorithm=MD5.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2262
req_src_ip=216.87.128.66 in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1".
.
#
U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060
REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT.
CSeq: 102 REGISTER.
Authorization: Digest
username="2424377",realm="augustvoice.net",uri="sip:64.90.42.25",response="039cee96c9321217973c4914314fc3ed",nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72",algorithm=MD5.
Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>.
Expires: 3600.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2581.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
CSeq: 102 REGISTER.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net",
nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72", algorithm=MD5.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2263
req_src_ip=216.87.128.66 in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1".
.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
9:15 p.m.
Whoops,
Sorry to waste you time.
I have rebuilt and repopulated the database so many times,
I forgot to check the obvious.
Yes, I was simply trying to log in as a user that didn't
have a password.
Thanks,
---greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Greg Fausak; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] problem with phone authentication
I don't have a quick reply to what the problem in your
setting could be
-- we haven't encountered any problems with 7960 authentication yet.
Some few suggestions you may want to verify follow. The first few
may sound too trivial, but I just want to be safe not to miss them
-- sometimes strange things happen sometimes when people work
too hard :)
- is the password really correct?
- is the route[1] really entered for Cisco messages too?
If that is none of these trivial errors, it may be worth trying if
things change when you use qop/authentication (the second paramterer
of www_authorize changed to "1") and/or replace
www_{authorize|challenge}
with proxy_{authorize|challenge}.
Other possible issues might have popped up, if you changed
use of plain-text
credentials to hashed credentials -- if that is the case, let me know.
-jiri
At 02:06 AM 1/18/2003, Greg Fausak wrote:
This works with my eStara soft phone client:
--------------cut
# route[1], REGISTER block
# REGISTER messages destined for our realm are forwarded here.
# after a successful registration a customer can receive calls.
#
route[1]
{
if(!www_authorize("augustvoice.net", "subscriber"))
{
www_challenge("augustvoice.net", "0");
break;
};
log("here is a register");
if(!save("location"))
{
sl_reply_error();
};
break;
}
---------------uncut
However, when I try to get my Cisco 7960 to authorize it
fails. I've
appended
the ngrep trace of the failed transaction. The
only
difference I can see is
that the line argument algorithm=MD5 is in the
WWW-Authenticate line.
Do I have to do something special to accept a MD5 password???
---greg
Greg Fausak
ngrep trace:
--------cut
#
U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060
REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT.
CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>.
Expires: 3600.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To:
sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2313.
Call-ID:
003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net",
nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72",
algorithm=MD5.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback
tells: pid=2262
req_src_ip=216.87.128.66
in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1".
.
#
U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060
REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT.
CSeq: 102 REGISTER.
Authorization: Digest
username="2424377",realm="augustvoice.net",uri="sip:64.90.42.2
5",response="039cee96c9321217973c4914314fc3ed",nonce="3e28a43a
000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72",algorithm=MD5.
Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>.
Expires: 3600.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0.
From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25.
To:
sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2581.
Call-ID:
003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101.
CSeq: 102 REGISTER.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net",
nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72",
algorithm=MD5.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback
tells: pid=2263
req_src_ip=216.87.128.66
in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1".
.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
7772
days inactive
7772
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Greg Fausak -
Jiri Kuthan -
lgfausakļ¼ august.net