Hi Tobias,

not the format is not valid for the RURI.

regards, bogdan

Tobias Lindgren wrote:

Hi all,

after a patch from one of our providers ACKs started to come with R-URI looking like: ACK sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020 SIP/2.0 instead of: ACK sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020 SIP/2.0 like it did before the patch.

The new ACK format gives an error in OpenSER: Jul 6 11:35:55 ser1 /sbin/openser[9634]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 parsed: <<sip> (4) / <sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020> (38) Jul 6 11:35:55 ser1 /sbin/openser[9634]: ERROR: parse_sip_msg_uri: bad uri <sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020> Jul 6 11:35:55 ser1 /sbin/openser[9634]: loose_route: Error while parsing Request URI

Are the new format of the ACKs valid? With the "<>"? If they are valid, the problem lies in OpenSER?

Br, /Tobias

---

Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users