Which Gateways is better.
I want to know which gateways are better.
I am comparing Audiocodes and Mediatrix.
Anyone have any opinions on either one good or bad?
Thanks
Hello Goran,
In my views Audiocodes are much better. I had worked on it, it supports SS7 also. One of the best machine i had ever worked on.But I am not familiar with Mediatrix, never heard of it before.
hope it will be usefull to you.
Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: Goran Donev To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:42 PM Subject: [Serusers] Which is Better!
Which Gateways is better.
I want to know which gateways are better.
I am comparing Audiocodes and Mediatrix.
Anyone have any opinions on either one good or bad?
Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I used analog (11xx) Mediatrix series for a long time, and I am happy with them. I think the answer depends on what you want to do with them.
ac is without problem but expensive mediatrix is good bur hard to configure. welltech is also good and simple. linksys is cheap and good.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Victor Stanescu" victor@gtstelecom.ro Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Which is Better!
I used analog (11xx) Mediatrix series for a long time, and I am happy with them. I think the answer depends on what you want to do with them.
-- Victor
Lokesh Kumar wrote:
Hello Goran,
In my views Audiocodes are much better. I had worked on it, it supports SS7 also. One of the best machine i had ever worked on.But I am not familiar with Mediatrix, never heard of it before.
hope it will be usefull to you.
Regards
----- Original Message ----- *From:* Goran Donev <mailto:gorand@dvvti.com> *To:* serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:42 PM *Subject:* [Serusers] Which is Better! Which Gateways is better. I want to know which gateways are better. I am comparing Audiocodes and Mediatrix. Anyone have any opinions on either one good or bad? Thanks _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
From my experience (a project where a Mediant was involved) I can say that the SIP stack from Audiocodes is not the best I have seen so far (but I have also seen worse once). And they do not provide updates very often. So it can happen that you are faced with your problem for several month until you get a fixed version.
Regards Nils
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 16:42, Goran Donev wrote:
Which Gateways is better.
I want to know which gateways are better.
I am comparing Audiocodes and Mediatrix.
Anyone have any opinions on either one good or bad?
Thanks
I was compiling ser.0.9.4 on a new box and Make spit this at me
tab.o -lfl -ldl -lresolv -o openser /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfl collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [openser] Error 1
I have searched far and wide for what the -lfl switch is for so I could install the package
Thanks,
Eric
libfl is a library used by python, should be found in ex. /usr/lib/libfl.a The library is called Flex.
RedHat: Name : flex Relocations: /usr Version : 2.5.4a Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. Release : 26 Build Date: Sun 23 Jun 2002 05:24:35 PM CEST Install date: Thu 09 Oct 2003 09:24:22 PM CEST Build Host: perf90.perf.redhat.com Group : Development/Tools Source RPM: flex-2.5.4a-26.src.rpm Size : 255124 License: BSD Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 03 Sep 2002 11:13:49 PM CEST, Key ID 219180cddb42a60e Packager : Red Hat, Inc. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla Summary : A tool for creating scanners (text pattern recognizers). Description : The flex program generates scanners. Scanners are programs which can recognize lexical patterns in text. Flex takes pairs of regular expressions and C code as input and generates a C source file as output. The output file is compiled and linked with a library to produce an executable. The executable searches through its input for occurrences of the regular expressions. When a match is found, it executes the corresponding C code.
Flex was designed to work with both Yacc and Bison, and is used by many programs as part of their build process.
g-)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Haskins" eric@rackspeed.net To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:45 PM Subject: [Serusers] ld -lfl ??? Does anyone know what package -lfl is??
I was compiling ser.0.9.4 on a new box and Make spit this at me
tab.o -lfl -ldl -lresolv -o openser /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfl collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [openser] Error 1
I have searched far and wide for what the -lfl switch is for so I could install the package
Thanks,
Eric _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Eric Haskins -
Goran Donev -
Greger V. Teigre -
Hakan YASTI -
Lokesh Kumar -
Nils Ohlmeier -
Victor Stanescu