Hi, all I'm implementing a black list, the control access to the gateway and other control policies and I have a problem with the call forking. In case of a call that generates a parallel forking I want the capability to select if accept or refuse the call for each single contact, but if the first reply that I send to the caller is an error message 4xx, the UA caller shuts down the call. What would I have to do to add my reject (caused by my access control policy) to the call forking administration and so reply an error only if all contacts can not be reachable? I'm trying to implement a solution to reply an error only if all the contacts can not be reachable. To do this thing I need to know the number of contacts that the lookup function has found for the request-uri that is arrived ( Is it possible to know if I have a single contact or a parallel forking?) and, if there are more than one contact associated to the sip uri, how can I go to serve the next contact in list without sending a reply for the destinations that I have to block? Any suggestion?
Thanks Daniele
This is not possible because the config script will be executed for the first branch only, thus you couldn't implement any per-branch policy.
Jan.
On 30-06 10:16, Zappasodi Daniele wrote:
Hi, all I'm implementing a black list, the control access to the gateway and other control policies and I have a problem with the call forking. In case of a call that generates a parallel forking I want the capability to select if accept or refuse the call for each single contact, but if the first reply that I send to the caller is an error message 4xx, the UA caller shuts down the call. What would I have to do to add my reject (caused by my access control policy) to the call forking administration and so reply an error only if all contacts can not be reachable? I'm trying to implement a solution to reply an error only if all the contacts can not be reachable. To do this thing I need to know the number of contacts that the lookup function has found for the request-uri that is arrived ( Is it possible to know if I have a single contact or a parallel forking?) and, if there are more than one contact associated to the sip uri, how can I go to serve the next contact in list without sending a reply for the destinations that I have to block? Any suggestion?
Thanks Daniele
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Jan,
Would cpl script be applied to all branchs, not just the first one?
Richard
--- Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
This is not possible because the config script will be executed for the first branch only, thus you couldn't implement any per-branch policy.
Jan.
On 30-06 10:16, Zappasodi Daniele wrote:
Hi, all I'm implementing a black list, the control access
to the gateway and other
control policies and I have a problem with the
call forking.
In case of a call that generates a parallel
forking I want the capability to
select if accept or refuse the call for each
single contact, but if the
first reply that I send to the caller is an error
message 4xx, the UA caller
shuts down the call. What would I have to do to add my reject (caused
by my access control
policy) to the call forking administration and so
reply an error only if all
contacts can not be reachable? I'm trying to implement a solution to reply an
error only if all the
contacts can not be reachable. To do this thing I need to know the number of
contacts that the lookup
function has found for the request-uri that is
arrived ( Is it possible to
know if I have a single contact or a parallel
forking?) and, if there are
more than one contact associated to the sip uri,
how can I go to serve the
next contact in list without sending a reply for
the destinations that I
have to block? Any suggestion?
Thanks Daniele
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Jan Janak -
Richard -
Zappasodi Daniele