Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 . Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but in case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request: 0(11348) method: <REGISTER> 0(11348) uri: sip:192.168.1.100 0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1 0(11348) end of header reached, state=5 0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(11348) After parse_msg... 0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128 0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc 0(11348) end of header reached, state=29 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256 0(11348) end of header reached, state=9 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37]; uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090] 0(11348) DEBUG: to body [sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090 ] 0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER> 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(11348) found end of header 0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432 0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100] == [192.168.1.100] 0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060 0(11348) check_self: host != me 0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60 0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0 0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0) 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc 0(11348) SER: new transaction fwd'ed 0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
--------------------------------- Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can change it in the phone's settings... Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar vids_cs@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 . Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but in case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request: 0(11348) method: <REGISTER> 0(11348) uri: sip:192.168.1.100 0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1 0(11348) end of header reached, state=5 0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(11348) After parse_msg... 0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128 0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc 0(11348) end of header reached, state=29 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256 0(11348) end of header reached, state=9 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37]; uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090] 0(11348) DEBUG: to body [sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090 ] 0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER> 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(11348) found end of header 0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432 0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100] == [192.168.1.100] 0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060 0(11348) check_self: host != me 0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60 0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0 0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0) 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc 0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed 0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Most softphones allow that. When you are specifying a SIP server, for default (normally) it uses 5060. If you want to alter this port just do the following:
ser_IP_address:port_number
127.0.0.1:5090
Jose Simoes
p.s. this works with X-Lite
On 12/5/05, Andrey Kouprianov andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can change it in the phone's settings... Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar vids_cs@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 . Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but
in
case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request: 0(11348) method: <REGISTER> 0(11348) uri: sip:192.168.1.100 0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1 0(11348) end of header reached, state=5 0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(11348) After parse_msg... 0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128 0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc 0(11348) end of header reached, state=29 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256 0(11348) end of header reached, state=9 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37]; uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090] 0(11348) DEBUG: to body [sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090 ] 0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER> 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(11348) found end of header 0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432 0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100]
==
[192.168.1.100] 0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060 0(11348) check_self: host != me 0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60 0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0 0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0) 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc 0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed 0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Jose. I tried your way but I did not get it registred. I used many ports but couldn't get it registred. I am not using any authentication and when using port 5060 the softphone registres OK. My SER and my softphone (X- lite) are on the same network. Any ideas? Thanks in advance,
Juan Ferrari United World Telecom
_____
From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Voipers Portugal Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 8:48 AM Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Changing Sip Port
Most softphones allow that. When you are specifying a SIP server, for default (normally) it uses 5060. If you want to alter this port just do the following:
ser_IP_address:port_number
127.0.0.1:5090
Jose Simoes
p.s. this works with X-Lite
On 12/5/05, Andrey Kouprianov andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can change it in the phone's settings... Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar vids_cs@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 . Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but in case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request: 0(11348) method: <REGISTER> 0(11348) uri: <sip: 192.168.1.100> 0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1 0(11348) end of header reached, state=5 0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(11348) After parse_msg... 0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128 0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc 0(11348) end of header reached, state=29 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256 0(11348) end of header reached, state=9 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37]; uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090] 0(11348) DEBUG: to body [sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090 ] 0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER> 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(11348) found end of header 0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432 0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100]
==
[192.168.1.100 http://192.168.1.100 ] 0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060 0(11348) check_self: host != me 0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60 0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0 0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0) 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc 0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed 0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
Yahoo! Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Andrey Kouprianov -
Juan -
sagar -
Voipers Portugal