13 Apr
2007
13 Apr
'07
4:02 p.m.
Does anyone else experienced this?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius accounting
is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash. The code
should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the attribute
based on value.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
13 Apr
13 Apr
6:28 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Hi Ovidiu,
there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
could you provide a BT?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Does anyone else experienced this?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius accounting
is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash. The code
should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the attribute
based on value.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
6:37 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Hi Bogdan,
I will get you one on Monday.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
could you provide a BT?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Does anyone else experienced this?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius accounting
is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash. The code
should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the attribute
based on value.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
16 Apr
16 Apr
7:50 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Hi Bogdan,
Here's the backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00190e98 in rc_avpair_assign (vp=0x946e7e8, pval=0x0, len=0) at
avpair.c:77
#1 0x00190fa2 in rc_avpair_new (rh=0x9469eb8, attrid=32, pval=0x0,
len=0, vendorpec=155641832) at avpair.c:118
#2 0x001914dc in rc_avpair_add (rh=0x9469eb8, list=0xbfde7934,
attrid=32, pval=0x0, len=0, vendorpec=0) at avpair.c:36
#3 0x00fbecd0 in acc_rad_request (req=0xb6174490) at acc.c:540
#4 0x00fc1195 in tmcb_func (t=0xb6173658, type=128, ps=0x1678f4) at
acc_logic.c:373
#5 0x00146130 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128, trans=0xb6173658,
req=0xb6174490, rpl=0x81539d8, code=200) at t_hooks.c:205
#6 0x001588a3 in relay_reply (t=0xb6173658, p_msg=0x81539d8,
branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0xbfde7b30) at t_reply.c:1140
#7 0x00159414 in reply_received (p_msg=0x81539d8) at t_reply.c:1373
#8 0x0805d3b6 in forward_reply (msg=0x81539d8) at forward.c:488
#9 0x0807b348 in receive_msg (
buf=0x811ac40 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.10.148;branch=z9hG4bK5448.283b30a3.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.128.65;branch=z9hG4bKdee07386f1ffa07d\r\nFrom: \"Ovidiu Sas\"
<sip:4165863565@10.11.10.148>;tag=6dfe150ab60fa5"..., len=962,
rcv_info=0xbfde7c50) at receive.c:195
#10 0x080a4393 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465
#11 0x08069f66 in main_loop () at main.c:834
#12 0x0806be57 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfde7e34) at main.c:1399
# openser -V
version: openser 1.2.0-notls (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
svnrevision: 2:1987M
@(#) $Id: main.c 1746 2007-03-05 16:06:58Z miconda $
main.c compiled on 09:29:33 Apr 11 2007 with gcc 3.4.4
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I will get you one on Monday.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
could you provide a BT?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Does anyone else experienced this?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius accounting
is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash. The code
should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the attribute
based on value.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
18 Apr
18 Apr
1:20 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Hi Ovidiu,
Thanks for the trace. I took a look through the radiusng lib and the
problem seams to be the RADIUS AVP type issue - that was discussed in a
separate thread - that all extra info is internally generated as strings.
The acc_extra value does not exists, so the (0,0) string is used, but
when the RADIUS AVP is added, as the type is INTEGER, radius string will
try to convert it to write it as integer and it will crash.
So, if you change in the radius dict the type of attribute to string, it
should net crash any more.
On the other hand, openser should be fixed also to be safe in such
cases. The solution will be not to added the RADIUS AVP for the empty
extra_acc values. I will made a fix on trunk - if you could test it, it
will be great.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Here's the backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00190e98 in rc_avpair_assign (vp=0x946e7e8, pval=0x0, len=0) at
avpair.c:77
#1 0x00190fa2 in rc_avpair_new (rh=0x9469eb8, attrid=32, pval=0x0,
len=0, vendorpec=155641832) at avpair.c:118
#2 0x001914dc in rc_avpair_add (rh=0x9469eb8, list=0xbfde7934,
attrid=32, pval=0x0, len=0, vendorpec=0) at avpair.c:36
#3 0x00fbecd0 in acc_rad_request (req=0xb6174490) at acc.c:540
#4 0x00fc1195 in tmcb_func (t=0xb6173658, type=128, ps=0x1678f4) at
acc_logic.c:373
#5 0x00146130 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128, trans=0xb6173658,
req=0xb6174490, rpl=0x81539d8, code=200) at t_hooks.c:205
#6 0x001588a3 in relay_reply (t=0xb6173658, p_msg=0x81539d8,
branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0xbfde7b30) at t_reply.c:1140
#7 0x00159414 in reply_received (p_msg=0x81539d8) at t_reply.c:1373
#8 0x0805d3b6 in forward_reply (msg=0x81539d8) at forward.c:488
#9 0x0807b348 in receive_msg (
buf=0x811ac40 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.10.148;branch=z9hG4bK5448.283b30a3.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.128.65;branch=z9hG4bKdee07386f1ffa07d\r\nFrom: \"Ovidiu Sas\"
<sip:4165863565@10.11.10.148>;tag=6dfe150ab60fa5"..., len=962,
rcv_info=0xbfde7c50) at receive.c:195
#10 0x080a4393 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465
#11 0x08069f66 in main_loop () at main.c:834
#12 0x0806be57 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfde7e34) at main.c:1399
# openser -V
version: openser 1.2.0-notls (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
svnrevision: 2:1987M
@(#) $Id: main.c 1746 2007-03-05 16:06:58Z miconda $
main.c compiled on 09:29:33 Apr 11 2007 with gcc 3.4.4
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I will get you one on Monday.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
could you provide a BT?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Does anyone else experienced this?
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius
accounting
>> is null or not defined, it is causing
openser to crash. The code
>> should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the
attribute
> based
on value.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
5:41 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Hi Bogdan,
The crash doesn't occur anymore and the system behave as expected.
You can backport the fix to 1.2.
I know that we discussed the integer vs. string issue in a separate thread.
Would it be difficult to fix this issue for radius?
If the avp is an integer and the radius attribute is also an integer
one, can we keep the type and push the value with the proper type into
the RADIUS request?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/18/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
Thanks for the trace. I took a look through the radiusng lib and the
problem seams to be the RADIUS AVP type issue - that was discussed in a
separate thread - that all extra info is internally generated as strings.
The acc_extra value does not exists, so the (0,0) string is used, but
when the RADIUS AVP is added, as the type is INTEGER, radius string will
try to convert it to write it as integer and it will crash.
So, if you change in the radius dict the type of attribute to string, it
should net crash any more.
On the other hand, openser should be fixed also to be safe in such
cases. The solution will be not to added the RADIUS AVP for the empty
extra_acc values. I will made a fix on trunk - if you could test it, it
will be great.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Here's the backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00190e98 in rc_avpair_assign (vp=0x946e7e8, pval=0x0, len=0) at
avpair.c:77
#1 0x00190fa2 in rc_avpair_new (rh=0x9469eb8, attrid=32, pval=0x0,
len=0, vendorpec=155641832) at avpair.c:118
#2 0x001914dc in rc_avpair_add (rh=0x9469eb8, list=0xbfde7934,
attrid=32, pval=0x0, len=0, vendorpec=0) at avpair.c:36
#3 0x00fbecd0 in acc_rad_request (req=0xb6174490) at acc.c:540
#4 0x00fc1195 in tmcb_func (t=0xb6173658, type=128, ps=0x1678f4) at
acc_logic.c:373
#5 0x00146130 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128, trans=0xb6173658,
req=0xb6174490, rpl=0x81539d8, code=200) at t_hooks.c:205
#6 0x001588a3 in relay_reply (t=0xb6173658, p_msg=0x81539d8,
branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0xbfde7b30) at t_reply.c:1140
#7 0x00159414 in reply_received (p_msg=0x81539d8) at t_reply.c:1373
#8 0x0805d3b6 in forward_reply (msg=0x81539d8) at forward.c:488
#9 0x0807b348 in receive_msg (
buf=0x811ac40 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.10.148;branch=z9hG4bK5448.283b30a3.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.128.65;branch=z9hG4bKdee07386f1ffa07d\r\nFrom: \"Ovidiu Sas\"
<sip:4165863565@10.11.10.148>;tag=6dfe150ab60fa5"..., len=962,
rcv_info=0xbfde7c50) at receive.c:195
#10 0x080a4393 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465
#11 0x08069f66 in main_loop () at main.c:834
#12 0x0806be57 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfde7e34) at main.c:1399
# openser -V
version: openser 1.2.0-notls (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
svnrevision: 2:1987M
@(#) $Id: main.c 1746 2007-03-05 16:06:58Z miconda $
main.c compiled on 09:29:33 Apr 11 2007 with gcc 3.4.4
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I will get you one on Monday.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
could you provide a BT?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Does anyone else experienced this?
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius
accounting
>> is null or not defined, it is causing
openser to crash. The code
>> should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the
attribute
>> based on value.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ovidiu Sas
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
6:05 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Hi Ovidiu,
I will do the backport to 1.2 and 1.1.
For the integer radius AVP - I do not say it is not possible or
difficult, but I need some time to take a look and make an evaluation.
In the mean while, pleas upload it as feature request.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
The crash doesn't occur anymore and the system behave as expected.
You can backport the fix to 1.2.
I know that we discussed the integer vs. string issue in a separate
thread.
Would it be difficult to fix this issue for radius?
If the avp is an integer and the radius attribute is also an integer
one, can we keep the type and push the value with the proper type into
the RADIUS request?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/18/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
Thanks for the trace. I took a look through the radiusng lib and the
problem seams to be the RADIUS AVP type issue - that was discussed in a
separate thread - that all extra info is internally generated as
strings.
The acc_extra value does not exists, so the (0,0) string is used, but
when the RADIUS AVP is added, as the type is INTEGER, radius string will
try to convert it to write it as integer and it will crash.
So, if you change in the radius dict the type of attribute to string, it
should net crash any more.
On the other hand, openser should be fixed also to be safe in such
cases. The solution will be not to added the RADIUS AVP for the empty
extra_acc values. I will made a fix on trunk - if you could test it, it
will be great.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Here's the backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00190e98 in rc_avpair_assign (vp=0x946e7e8, pval=0x0, len=0) at
avpair.c:77
#1 0x00190fa2 in rc_avpair_new (rh=0x9469eb8, attrid=32, pval=0x0,
len=0, vendorpec=155641832) at avpair.c:118
#2 0x001914dc in rc_avpair_add (rh=0x9469eb8, list=0xbfde7934,
attrid=32, pval=0x0, len=0, vendorpec=0) at avpair.c:36
#3 0x00fbecd0 in acc_rad_request (req=0xb6174490) at acc.c:540
#4 0x00fc1195 in tmcb_func (t=0xb6173658, type=128, ps=0x1678f4) at
acc_logic.c:373
#5 0x00146130 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128, trans=0xb6173658,
req=0xb6174490, rpl=0x81539d8, code=200) at t_hooks.c:205
#6 0x001588a3 in relay_reply (t=0xb6173658, p_msg=0x81539d8,
branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0xbfde7b30) at t_reply.c:1140
#7 0x00159414 in reply_received (p_msg=0x81539d8) at t_reply.c:1373
#8 0x0805d3b6 in forward_reply (msg=0x81539d8) at forward.c:488
#9 0x0807b348 in receive_msg (
buf=0x811ac40 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.10.148;branch=z9hG4bK5448.283b30a3.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.128.65;branch=z9hG4bKdee07386f1ffa07d\r\nFrom: \"Ovidiu Sas\"
<sip:4165863565@10.11.10.148>;tag=6dfe150ab60fa5"..., len=962,
rcv_info=0xbfde7c50) at receive.c:195
#10 0x080a4393 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465
#11 0x08069f66 in main_loop () at main.c:834
#12 0x0806be57 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfde7e34) at main.c:1399
# openser -V
version: openser 1.2.0-notls (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
svnrevision: 2:1987M
@(#) $Id: main.c 1746 2007-03-05 16:06:58Z miconda $
main.c compiled on 09:29:33 Apr 11 2007 with gcc 3.4.4
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I will get you one on Monday.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
> > Hi Ovidiu,
> >
> > there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
> > modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
> >
> > could you provide a BT?
> >
> > regards,
> > bogdan
> >
> > Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> > > Does anyone else experienced this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ovidiu Sas
> > >
> > > On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius
> accounting
> > >> is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash. The
code
>
>> should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the
attribute
> >> based on value.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ovidiu Sas
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel(a)openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
>
>
6:25 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash
Done:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=170300…
Thank you,
Ovidiu
On 4/18/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
I will do the backport to 1.2 and 1.1.
For the integer radius AVP - I do not say it is not possible or
difficult, but I need some time to take a look and make an evaluation.
In the mean while, pleas upload it as feature request.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
The crash doesn't occur anymore and the system behave as expected.
You can backport the fix to 1.2.
I know that we discussed the integer vs. string issue in a separate
thread.
Would it be difficult to fix this issue for radius?
If the avp is an integer and the radius attribute is also an integer
one, can we keep the type and push the value with the proper type into
the RADIUS request?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/18/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
Thanks for the trace. I took a look through the radiusng lib and the
problem seams to be the RADIUS AVP type issue - that was discussed in a
separate thread - that all extra info is internally generated as
strings.
The acc_extra value does not exists, so the (0,0) string is used, but
when the RADIUS AVP is added, as the type is INTEGER, radius string will
try to convert it to write it as integer and it will crash.
So, if you change in the radius dict the type of attribute to string, it
should net crash any more.
On the other hand, openser should be fixed also to be safe in such
cases. The solution will be not to added the RADIUS AVP for the empty
extra_acc values. I will made a fix on trunk - if you could test it, it
will be great.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Here's the backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00190e98 in rc_avpair_assign (vp=0x946e7e8, pval=0x0, len=0) at
avpair.c:77
#1 0x00190fa2 in rc_avpair_new (rh=0x9469eb8, attrid=32, pval=0x0,
len=0, vendorpec=155641832) at avpair.c:118
#2 0x001914dc in rc_avpair_add (rh=0x9469eb8, list=0xbfde7934,
attrid=32, pval=0x0, len=0, vendorpec=0) at avpair.c:36
#3 0x00fbecd0 in acc_rad_request (req=0xb6174490) at acc.c:540
#4 0x00fc1195 in tmcb_func (t=0xb6173658, type=128, ps=0x1678f4) at
acc_logic.c:373
#5 0x00146130 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128, trans=0xb6173658,
req=0xb6174490, rpl=0x81539d8, code=200) at t_hooks.c:205
#6 0x001588a3 in relay_reply (t=0xb6173658, p_msg=0x81539d8,
branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0xbfde7b30) at t_reply.c:1140
#7 0x00159414 in reply_received (p_msg=0x81539d8) at t_reply.c:1373
#8 0x0805d3b6 in forward_reply (msg=0x81539d8) at forward.c:488
#9 0x0807b348 in receive_msg (
buf=0x811ac40 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.10.148;branch=z9hG4bK5448.283b30a3.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.11.128.65;branch=z9hG4bKdee07386f1ffa07d\r\nFrom: \"Ovidiu Sas\"
<sip:4165863565@10.11.10.148>;tag=6dfe150ab60fa5"..., len=962,
rcv_info=0xbfde7c50) at receive.c:195
#10 0x080a4393 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465
#11 0x08069f66 in main_loop () at main.c:834
#12 0x0806be57 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfde7e34) at main.c:1399
# openser -V
version: openser 1.2.0-notls (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
svnrevision: 2:1987M
@(#) $Id: main.c 1746 2007-03-05 16:06:58Z miconda $
main.c compiled on 09:29:33 Apr 11 2007 with gcc 3.4.4
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/13/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I will get you one on Monday.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
> > Hi Ovidiu,
> >
> > there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
> > modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
> >
> > could you provide a BT?
> >
> > regards,
> > bogdan
> >
> > Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> > > Does anyone else experienced this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ovidiu Sas
> > >
> > > On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius
> accounting
> > >> is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash. The
code
> > >> should check if the avp or PV
is null and drop or send the
> attribute
> > >> based on value.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Ovidiu Sas
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devel mailing list
> > > Devel(a)openser.org
> > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > >
> >
> >
>
6373
days inactive
6378
days old
7 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Ovidiu Sas