[Users] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

RE: [Users] out of memory

[Serusers] Header Selects

Daniel-Constantin Mierla

12 Mar 2007 12 Mar '07

2:31 p.m.

Hello, version 1.2.0 of OpenSER has been released. It is major release, which means that you get along a lot of new features and improvements to existing ones in old versions. The configuration file and database structure suffered some changers, please read careful release notes to learn how to update. Just to list few of the new features: - SIMPLE Presence support (http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/presence:presence-module) - SNMP (http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/snmpstats.html) - PERL API (http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/perl.html) - JAVA SIP Servlet Application Server (http://wesip.eu) - script variables and transformations (http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/transformations:devel) - DNS failover - IP blacklists - XMPP IM gateway - XMLRPC - SIP session timers - secure federation peering - retransmission timer accuracy - usrloc refurbished for better performances - automatic error handling - AVPs in reply routes Read full release notes at: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/OpenSER-v1.2.x-Release-Notes/ Source tarball can be downloaded from: http://www.openser.org/pub/openser/latest/src/ Or SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=139143&package_id… This is the first release coming out o SVN. Old CVS repository was migrated to SVN, and with these, a few changes apply to get sources from repository. Please read instructions from download page: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/Download/ Migration instructions (although not complete, I'm sure) are available at: http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:1.1.x-to-1.2.x The documentation for modules is posted at: http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/ We would like to thank to all developers and contributors for their work with coding and testing for this new release. Cheers, Daniel

Show replies by date

Klaus Darilion

13 Mar 13 Mar

10:26 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

...

-- Klaus Darilion nic.at

Daniel-Constantin Mierla

10:36 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On 03/13/07 16:26, Klaus Darilion wrote:

...

openser.org/docs has to be updated, indeed, pseudovariables:1.2.x and others were done during the weekend. Thanks for reporting, Cheers, Daniel

...

regards klaus Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Ovidiu Sas

10:44 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Hi, The dialog PV are missing from the 1.2 and devel PV webpage. http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/dialog.html#AEN185 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On 3/13/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:

...

On 03/13/07 16:26, Klaus Darilion wrote:

openser.org/docs has to be updated, indeed, pseudovariables:1.2.x and others were done during the weekend. Thanks for reporting, Cheers, Daniel

regards klaus Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

14 Mar 14 Mar

6:13 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Hi Klaus, this was a collective effort - There was a huge volume of help for testing, troubleshooting and fixing problems, help coming from all over the community. Also we thanks to everybody contributing to openser , disregarding if it is about code, patches, reports, ideas, docs, etc...All this put together made this great result! BTW, we did some tests with OpenSER 1.2.0 and today we will publish the results ;) regards, bogdan Klaus Darilion wrote:

...

wanding wang

28 Mar 28 Mar

1:14 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

While I tried to modify the code, I found it is a big challenge for the newbie to understand the make and build system. Just wondering if anybody is considering use CMake to replace the autotool. KDE4 is now using this user-friendly and cross-system build system, so I assume it will become more popular. Wanding. Everything is possible. Everytime I am thinking. On 3/14/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:

...

congratulations! thanks for the hard work. regards klaus PS: someone should make a snapshot of http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/pseudovariables:devel and name it pseudovariables:1.2.x and update openser.org/docs regards klaus Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > version 1.2.0 of OpenSER has been released. It is major release, > which means that you get along a lot of new features and improvements > to existing ones in old versions. The configuration file and database > structure suffered some changers, please read careful release notes > to learn how to update. > > Just to list few of the new features: > - SIMPLE Presence support > (http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/presence:presence-module) > - SNMP (http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/snmpstats.html) > - PERL API (http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/perl.html) > - JAVA SIP Servlet Application Server (http://wesip.eu) > - script variables and transformations > (http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/transformations:devel) > - DNS failover > - IP blacklists > - XMPP IM gateway > - XMLRPC > - SIP session timers > - secure federation peering > - retransmission timer accuracy > - usrloc refurbished for better performances > - automatic error handling > - AVPs in reply routes > > Read full release notes at: > http://www.openser.org/mos/view/OpenSER-v1.2.x-Release-Notes/ > > Source tarball can be downloaded from: > http://www.openser.org/pub/openser/latest/src/ > Or SourceForge: >

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=139143&package_id…

This is the first release coming out o SVN. Old CVS repository was migrated to SVN, and with these, a few changes apply to get sources from repository. Please read instructions from download page: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/Download/ Migration instructions (although not complete, I'm sure) are available at: http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:1.1.x-to-1.2.x The documentation for modules is posted at: http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/ We would like to thank to all developers and contributors for their work with coding and testing for this new release. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Cesc

29 Mar 29 Mar

7 p.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Hi, Just throwing wild ideas ... but if we moved to autotools (we need to look for a guru ... I agree, more than autotools is auto-chaos) we could easily cross-compile ... And that said, it just comes to mind the chance of cross-compiling with mingw and have a windows openser, just for the non-linux user and expand our borders. It may be a cut down version to start with, but wouldn't it be great? Cesc On 3/28/07, wanding wang <wang.wanding(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/pseudovariables:devel and

> name it pseudovariables: 1.2.x and update openser.org/docs > > regards > klaus > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Hello, >> >> version 1.2.0 of OpenSER has been released. It is major release, >> which means that you get along a lot of new features and improvements >> to existing ones in old versions. The configuration file and database >> structure suffered some changers, please read careful release notes >> to learn how to update. >> >> Just to list few of the new features: >> - SIMPLE Presence support >> (

http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/presence:presence-module)

>> - SNMP

(http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/snmpstats.html)

>> - PERL API (

http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/perl.html)

>> - JAVA SIP Servlet Application Server (http://wesip.eu) >> - script variables and transformations >>

(http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/transformations:devel)

>> - DNS failover >> - IP blacklists >> - XMPP IM gateway >> - XMLRPC >> - SIP session timers >> - secure federation peering >> - retransmission timer accuracy >> - usrloc refurbished for better performances >> - automatic error handling >> - AVPs in reply routes >> >> Read full release notes at: >>

http://www.openser.org/mos/view/OpenSER-v1.2.x-Release-Notes/

>> >> Source tarball can be downloaded from: >> http://www.openser.org/pub/openser/latest/src/ >> Or SourceForge: >>

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=139143&package_id…

>> >> >> This is the first release coming out o SVN. Old CVS repository was >> migrated to SVN, and with these, a few changes apply to get sources >> from repository. Please read instructions from download page: >> http://www.openser.org/mos/view/Download/ >> >> Migration instructions (although not complete, I'm sure) are >> available at: >>

http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:1.1.x-to-1.2.x

The documentation for modules is posted at: http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/ We would like to thank to all developers and contributors for their work with coding and testing for this new release. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Henning Westerholt

30 Mar 30 Mar

4:57 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On Friday 30 March 2007 01:00, Cesc wrote:

...

Hi Cesc, i don't think that it would be so easy to port openser to windows, there are many Unix/ Linux specific thinks specified deep in the code. More easy cross-compiling could be nice. But then we should use cmake instead of autotools, like the KDE project, because this is usable even for non-gurus like me. :-) Cheers, Henning

Cesc

5:30 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On 3/30/07, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:

...

On Friday 30 March 2007 01:00, Cesc wrote:

Hi, Well, never used cmake myself, so can't tell. Autotools is complicated if starting from scratch, but if using existing configs from some other project, the jumpstart is very big. As for the port ... i would expect some difficulties in some parts, like locking, loging and memory mgmnt ... also some database access libraries ... but maybe a simple, very cut-down version, with basic functionality, could be realized ... Just brainstorming ... Cesc

Daniel-Constantin Mierla

5:45 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Hello, On 03/30/07 12:30, Cesc wrote:

...

On 3/30/07, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:

On Friday 30 March 2007 01:00, Cesc wrote:

database should not rise issues. For locking/memory can be used sysv. The module interface should be analyzed. Won't be easy, though... Cheers, Daniel

...

Just brainstorming ... Cesc _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

"C. Bergström"

6:51 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On Friday 30 March 2007 01:00, Cesc wrote:

...

No. Posix based software was in general never intended to run on Windows. More often than not the additional effort isn't worth it and another thing to pull away from core development. This is not even to mention the packaging effort which goes with it as the MS crowd expects binaries. Finding a developer which will solely handle the entire task is difficult and once you open the box someone is stuck with it from there on. Feel free to ignore this as it's just my observation from what I have seen in quite a few projects which this was requested and attempted. Cheers, Christopher

Henning Westerholt

7:04 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On Friday 30 March 2007 12:51, C. Bergström wrote:

...

Just throwing wild ideas ... but if we moved to autotools (we need to look for a guru ... I agree, more than autotools is auto-chaos) we could easily cross-compile ... And that said, it just comes to mind the chance of cross-compiling with mingw and have a windows openser, just for the non-linux user and expand our borders. It may be a cut down version to start with, but wouldn't it be great?

No. Posix based software was in general never intended to run on Windows. More often than not the additional effort isn't worth it and another thing to pull away from core development. [...]

The effort could be quite high, you're right. And i don't think it is right thing to do to port every free software project on the planet to the MS Windows platform, if they want to use e.g. OpenSER, they should use linux or a other unix system. :-) If anybody want to pay a developer for this, then it is another question. But it is also my opionion that this work should not be done from the core development team. Best regards, Henning

Cesc

8:03 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On 3/30/07, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:

...

On Friday 30 March 2007 12:51, C. Bergström wrote:

No. Posix based software was in general never intended to run on Windows. More often than not the additional effort isn't worth it and another thing to pull away from core development. [...]

I agree that this could mean quite some effort, that it need not be directly supported by the core team, but there is a lot of satelite developers who may do that in their "free time", as a hobby. I don't agree in the monolithic version of "only linux" ... running on another platform, being portable, opens a whole new bunch of oportunities to any project ... For one, in my company, we run embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units ... that is work! Cesc

jh＠tutpro.com

8:10 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Cesc writes:

...

For one, in my company, we run embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units ... that is work!

why don't you ask your windows software to be ported to linux? then you would have only one platform to worry about. -- juha

Cesc

8:19 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On 3/30/07, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:

...

Cesc writes:

For one, in my company, we run embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units ... that is work!

why don't you ask your windows software to be ported to linux? then you would have only one platform to worry about. -- juha

:) yes, i know, there is always two faces to a story ... Look, the "my-work" example was just to show that being flexible and open is not bad ... of course it takes more effort; this is like all in life, pros and cons. Basically, going back to the origins of this thread: I think we should not bluntly discard new building ways just because one of the outcomes may be a windows-based openser. Now, if all the porting needed can be done with the current makefiles ... ok then. Cesc

wanding wang

31 Mar 31 Mar

9:25 p.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

So why not try to see the beautiful scene if Openser can run on every kind of server platform? Anyway, Windows Server system will not disappear in the seen future, and what's more, some organizations and companies still seriously rely on Windows, I mean if they found Openser can be integrated into their Enterprise application systems on hand, they will probably be very excited. Even as the common user, I believe our planet is looking forward to a power ,stable and free SIP server, just like Apache HTTP server! In order to fully understand the whole picture of Openser, I try to find some architecture documents, but I failed, who can do me a favor? So I try to figure out the relationship of some key modules as the attachment, any comments will be appreciated. Wanding. Everythig is possible. Everytime I am thinking. On 3/30/07, Cesc <cesc.santa(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

On 3/30/07, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:

Cesc writes:

For one, in my company, we run embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units ... that is work!

why don't you ask your windows software to be ported to linux? then you would have only one platform to worry about. -- juha

jh＠tutpro.com

1 Apr 1 Apr

1:02 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

wanding wang writes:

...

So why not try to see the beautiful scene if Openser can run on every kind of server platform?

because that will eat resources that would otherwise go into development of new features, enhancing performance, fixing bugs, responding to mailing list messages, etc. -- juha

Henning Westerholt

2 Apr 2 Apr

3:50 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On Sunday 01 April 2007 03:25, wanding wang wrote:

...

[windows or not windows..] In order to fully understand the whole picture of Openser, I try to find some architecture documents, but I failed, who can do me a favor?

Hi Wanding, i read the "SIP Express Router v0.8.8 - Developer’s Guide" from iptel.org as introduction into the code/ design. But this is outdated in many areas, like the fifo mechanism. So just read the code. ;-) If there are any newer documents about the design/ internal workings of openser, i would appreciate a pointer to it too. Cheers, Henning

Cesc

30 Mar 30 Mar

8:08 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Hi Daniel, Core team support ... this work would need not be done by the core team, but if in-depth support in the form of inside knowledge was offered, that should be enough to start with ... Once the cross-compile environment is setup and running, to be used by everyone, this would be a job of everyone to maintain. Cesc On 3/30/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:

...

Hello, On 03/30/07 12:30, Cesc wrote:

On 3/30/07, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:

On Friday 30 March 2007 01:00, Cesc wrote:

database should not rise issues. For locking/memory can be used sysv. The module interface should be analyzed. Won't be easy, though... Cheers, Daniel

Just brainstorming ... Cesc _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Henning Westerholt

6:29 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

On Friday 30 March 2007 11:30, Cesc wrote:

...

Well, never used cmake myself, so can't tell. Autotools is complicated if starting from scratch, but if using existing configs from some other project, the jumpstart is very big.

As long as you don't need to change anything with autotools, and you can stay with your copied configuration, then autotools work fine. I follow the KDE project closely, and they made good experiences with cmake after a long period of autotools problems, http://dot.kde.org/1172083974/ . I look a little bit into this, and it seems ok.

...

As for the port ... i would expect some difficulties in some parts, like locking, loging and memory mgmnt ... also some database access libraries ... but maybe a simple, very cut-down version, with basic functionality, could be realized ...

Do you expect a huge interest in a windows port? Henning

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

8:18 a.m.

New subject: [Users] Re: [Business] Re: [Devel] OpenSER v1.2.0 released

Hi Cesc, that is totally true - the key question is actually if we need autotools - the current makefile is self-configuring (autodetection) and so far worked mainly with no problems. So - are there some major problems to push us to autotools?? otherwise, without a guru with free time, it will be something that will make our lives more complicated. regards, Bogdan Cesc wrote:

...

Just throwing wild ideas ... but if we moved to autotools (we need to look for a guru ... I agree, more than autotools is auto-chaos)

6478

days inactive

6499

days old

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

Manage subscription

20 comments

9 participants

tags (0)

participants (9)

"C. Bergström"
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Cesc
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Henning Westerholt
jh＠tutpro.com
Klaus Darilion
Ovidiu Sas
wanding wang