30 Jun
2005
30 Jun
'05
6:51 a.m.
Is there a way to have multiple sip addresses for one account in
serweb? For example, if a group or business wanted to have one
login/account to view the activity/preferences for all of their sip
addresses.
Thanks!
- Daryl
30 Jun
30 Jun
1:04 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
Hi all,
I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how to do
it. May one of you can help me.
I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to enable
presence service. I have loaded the pa.so module and added the typical lines
to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
if (t_newtran()){
handle_subscription("registrar");
break;
};
};
However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER replies
with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a problem in
parsing the header of the message in SER.
Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously to the
development of my project.l
Thanks in advance.
Victor
6:36 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
I never heard of someone who successfully used the pa module :-(
Which clients do you use? Probably you have to extend the pa module to
support your client.
klaus
Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how to
do it. May one of you can help me.
I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to enable
presence service. I have loaded the pa.so module and added the typical
lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
if (t_newtran()){
handle_subscription("registrar");
break;
};
};
However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously to
the development of my project.l
Thanks in advance.
Victor
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
8:10 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
I use Windows Messenger 4.7 and EyeBeam v1.1. and none have worked at all.
How could I extend the pa module using the SER v0.8.14? Do I take the pa
module from the cvs? Do you know if it is going to work is this version of
SER?
Thanks
Victor
From: Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
To: Victor Huertas Garcia <vhuertas(a)hotmail.com>
CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER
v0.8.14!!!
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:36:32 +0200
I never heard of someone who successfully used the pa module :-(
Which clients do you use? Probably you have to extend the pa module to
support your client.
klaus
Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how to
do it. May one of you can help me.
I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to enable
presence service. I have loaded the pa.so module and added the typical
lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
if (t_newtran()){
handle_subscription("registrar");
break;
};
};
However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously to
the development of my project.l
Thanks in advance.
Victor
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
1 Jul
1 Jul
1:08 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
On 30-06-2005 18:36, Klaus Darilion wrote:
I never heard of someone who successfully used the pa
module :-(
I did. And I know of several people/companies using it. The problem is
that there are so many SIMPLE specifications and drafts that it would
take a really long time to implement it properly. And also it is hard
to do you have no reasonable user agents for testing.
Jan.
Which clients do you use? Probably you have to extend the pa module to
support your client.
klaus
Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how to
do it. May one of you can help me.
I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to enable
presence service. I have loaded the pa.so module and added the typical
lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
if (t_newtran()){
handle_subscription("registrar");
break;
};
};
However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously to
the development of my project.l
Thanks in advance.
Victor
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
8:54 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
Hi Jan!
Can you please name some user agents which are known to work?
regards,
klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
On 30-06-2005 18:36, Klaus Darilion wrote:
I never heard of someone who successfully used the
pa module :-(
I did. And I know of several people/companies using it. The problem is
that there are so many SIMPLE specifications and drafts that it would
take a really long time to implement it properly. And also it is hard
to do you have no reasonable user agents for testing.
Jan.
Which clients do you use? Probably you have to
extend the pa module to
support your client.
klaus
Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how to
do it. May one of you can help me.
I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to enable
presence service. I have loaded the pa.so module and added the typical
lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
if (t_newtran()){
handle_subscription("registrar");
break;
};
};
However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously to
the development of my project.l
Thanks in advance.
Victor
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
9:02 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
Could you tell me some reasonable user agents for testing this feature? I
have Windows Messenger 4.7 and 5.1 and EyeBeam v1.1 (X-ten) with no success
at all? Always the same reply from SER (400 Bad REquest: Error parsing
headers)
Thank you for your answer...
Victor
From: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>
To: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
CC: Victor Huertas Garcia <vhuertas(a)hotmail.com>om>, serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER
v0.8.14!!!
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:08:51 +0200
On 30-06-2005 18:36, Klaus Darilion wrote:
I never heard of someone who successfully used
the pa module :-(
I did. And I know of several people/companies using it. The problem is
that there are so many SIMPLE specifications and drafts that it would
take a really long time to implement it properly. And also it is hard
to do you have no reasonable user agents for testing.
Jan.
Which clients do you use? Probably you have to extend the pa module to
support your client.
klaus
Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how
to
>do it. May one of you can help me.
>
>I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to
enable
>presence service. I have loaded the pa.so
module and added the typical
>lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
>
>if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
> if (t_newtran()){
> handle_subscription("registrar");
> break;
> };
>};
>
>However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
>replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
>problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
>
>Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
>would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously
to
> >the development of my project.l
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >
> >Victor
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
10:49 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
kphone and Eyebeam to some extent.
Jan.
On 01-07-2005 08:54, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Jan!
Can you please name some user agents which are known to work?
regards,
klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
>On 30-06-2005 18:36, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>>I never heard of someone who successfully used the pa module :-(
>
>
> I did. And I know of several people/companies using it. The problem is
> that there are so many SIMPLE specifications and drafts that it would
> take a really long time to implement it properly. And also it is hard
> to do you have no reasonable user agents for testing.
>
> Jan.
>
>
>>Which clients do you use? Probably you have to extend the pa module to
>>support your client.
>>
>>klaus
>>
>>Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how to
>>>do it. May one of you can help me.
>>>
>>>I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to enable
>>>presence service. I have loaded the pa.so module and added the typical
>>>lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in the SER to provide this capability:
>>>
>>>if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
>>> if (t_newtran()){
>>> handle_subscription("registrar");
>>> break;
>>> };
>>>};
>>>
>>>However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
>>>replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
>>>problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
>>>
>>>Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong I
>>>would appreciate it a lot because this problem is affecting seriously to
>>>the development of my project.l
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>Victor
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
11 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER v0.8.14!!!
Hi Jan,
I haven't tested Kphone yet but regarding EyeBeam, it doesn't work.
It would be good to know what software is using these companies you told
us...
Regards
Victor
From: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>
To: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
CC: Victor Huertas Garcia <vhuertas(a)hotmail.com>om>, serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] URGENT!! SUBSCRIBE message handling failure in SER
v0.8.14!!!
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:49:23 +0200
kphone and Eyebeam to some extent.
Jan.
On 01-07-2005 08:54, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Jan!
Can you please name some user agents which are known to work?
regards,
klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
>On 30-06-2005 18:36, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>>I never heard of someone who successfully used the pa module :-(
>
>
> I did. And I know of several people/companies using it. The problem
is
> that there are so many SIMPLE
specifications and drafts that it would
> take a really long time to implement it properly. And also it is hard
> to do you have no reasonable user agents for testing.
>
> Jan.
>
>
>>Which clients do you use? Probably you have to extend the pa module to
>>support your client.
>>
>>klaus
>>
>>Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I have a very urgent problem I should solve ASAP but I don't know how
to
>>>do it. May one of you can help me.
>>>
>>>I am using the stable version of SER v.0.8.14 and I would like to
enable
>>>presence service. I have loaded the
pa.so module and added the
typical
>>>lines to process the SUBSCRIBEs in
the SER to provide this
capability:
>>>
>>>if (method=="SUBSCRIBE"){
>>> if (t_newtran()){
>>> handle_subscription("registrar");
>>> break;
>>> };
>>>};
>>>
>>>However each time the SIP endpoint sends a SUBSCRIBE message the SER
>>>replies with a 400 Bad Request. According to the LOGs there must be a
>>>problem in parsing the header of the message in SER.
>>>
>>>Please, if there is somebody who can give a clue to know what's wrong
I
>>>would appreciate it a lot because
this problem is affecting seriously
to
> >>>the development of my project.l
> >>>
> >>>Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>>Victor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Serusers mailing list
> >>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
12:40 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Instant Messaging User Agent Interoperability problem
Hi all,
I am testing the Instant Message Service with the SER v0.8.14 and I see that
it routes them correctly towards the destination user agent. However, what I
have seen is a tremendous imcompatibility between user agents of different
vendors.
Here just a bit of this:
IM between two Windows Messenger 4.7.
What I see it that the very first MESSAGE in the conversation is sent
towards the SER and it routes it perfectly but the subsequent MESSAGES are
exchange between both Messengers directly!!! It is weird... but this is how
it is working.
IM between Window Messenger 4.7 and EyeBeam v1.1
The EyeBeam always send the MESSAGES towards the SIP proxy and messenger
receive them with no problem. However, when the messenger tries to send a
MESSAGE in the conversation it even doesn't send the packet (I tried to
capture it with Ethereal and no packet was sent at all) and subsequently
tell you that the text message could not be delivered to the destination.
IM between EyeBeam v1.1
No problem at all.
IM involving Windows Messenger 5.1
This version of messenger sends an INVITE to the destination before issuing
the MESSAGE. With EyeBeam is a total disaster and the comunication is not
possible.
My conclusion is that the SER has not implication in such incompatibility at
all and that is a matter of interoperability among vendors and different
implementations of SIMPLE. Do you agree?
Thanks in advance
Victor
1:16 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Instant Messaging User Agent Interoperability problem
Victor Huertas Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
I am testing the Instant Message Service with the SER v0.8.14 and I see
that it routes them correctly towards the destination user agent.
However, what I have seen is a tremendous imcompatibility between user
agents of different vendors.
Here just a bit of this:
IM between two Windows Messenger 4.7.
What I see it that the very first MESSAGE in the conversation is sent
towards the SER and it routes it perfectly but the subsequent MESSAGES
are exchange between both Messengers directly!!! It is weird... but this
is how it is working.
IM between Window Messenger 4.7 and EyeBeam v1.1
The EyeBeam always send the MESSAGES towards the SIP proxy and messenger
receive them with no problem. However, when the messenger tries to send
a MESSAGE in the conversation it even doesn't send the packet (I tried
to capture it with Ethereal and no packet was sent at all) and
subsequently tell you that the text message could not be delivered to
the destination.
IM between EyeBeam v1.1
No problem at all.
IM involving Windows Messenger 5.1
This version of messenger sends an INVITE to the destination before
issuing the MESSAGE. With EyeBeam is a total disaster and the
comunication is not possible.
My conclusion is that the SER has not implication in such
incompatibility at all and that is a matter of interoperability among
vendors and different implementations of SIMPLE. Do you agree?
Correct!
Some notes: WM 4.7 replies with a Contact: header in the 200 OK to
MESSAGE. This is not allowed according to the MESSAGE RFC, but WM uses
this contact for further messages to this user. I think you can bypass
this problem by using record_route.
WM 5.1: You can force WM 5.1 to fall back to "old mode" by catching the
INVITEs in ser and reply with 4xx. But 5.1 wont accept MESSAGE without
prior INVITE :-(
regards,
klaus
6900
days inactive
6901
days old
10 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daryl Sanders -
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion -
Victor Huertas Garcia