Jan,
Thanks for the reply. I did change the parameter to 0 and saw the natping
packets being sent out. I did find that cisco in 6.3 Pix code addresses SIP
with NAT/PAT
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_exa
mple09186a00801fc74a.shtml
Im guessing this could be the cause that its not seeing my clients behind
NAT as being behind a NAT.... ?
Thanks,
Harold
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 3:27 AM
To: Harold Workman
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] rtpproxy
Maybe SER does not detect your x-lite as behind NAT. Try to set
ping_nated_only parameter to 0, re-register x-lite and see if it
receives any natping packets (or if ser sends them).
Jan.
On 03-06 12:33, Harold Workman wrote:
Hi,
I am still having some problems with users behind NAT. I am using X-Lite
and
forcing it as Symmetric Firewall. For testing I am
using the
nathelper.cfg
from CVS folder with only additions of mysql. Calling
from X-Lite sound
works
fine. If the X-Lite sits idle for over a minute I am
unable to make a
call to
the X-Lite. I ran ethereal but am not seeing any
packets pertaining to
rtpproxy which should be every 10 seconds. I also read the README for
rtpproxy
and it doesnt look up to date. It says to run
rtpproxy type
rtpproxy -s <proto>:<address>[:<port>] What is the correct way to run
rtpproxy
and is there up to date documentation on rtpproxy? I
added my ser.cfg to
the
email as well...
Thanks for your help in advance
debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)
/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes
*/
listen=64.72.107.4
listen=127.0.0.1
# hostname matching an alias will satisfy the condition uri==myself".
alias=cytelcom.com
alias=64.72.107.4
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
# Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
# mysql.so must be loaded !
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# !! Nathelper
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
# database location
modparam("usrloc", "db_url",
"sql://ser:n0kia12@localhost/ser")
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#
modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#
modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# database location
modparam("auth_db", "db_url",
"sql://ser:n0kia12@localhost/ser")
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# !! Nathelper
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) # Ping interval 10 s
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients
behind
NAT
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len >= max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
# !! Nathelper
# Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is
# executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses
# in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also,
# the received test should, if completed, should check all
# vias for rpesence of received
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
# Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that
# a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is
# a REGISTER
if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) {
log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n");
# This will work only for user agents that support symmetric
# communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is
# smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a
configuration
# option. With Cisco 7960, it is called
NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone
it is
# called "symmetric media" and
"symmetric signalling".
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP
};
force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via
setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
};
};
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
# subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
# use different transport protocol
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
# (in case, it does not work, use the following command
# with proper names and addresses in it)
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("cytelcom.com", "subscriber")) {
www_challenge("cytelcom.com", "0");
break;
};
save("location");
break;
};
lookup("aliases");
if (!uri==myself) {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
};
append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
route(1);
}
route[1]
{
# !! Nathelper
if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" &&
!search("^Route:")){
sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP
addresses");
break;
};
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay
if (isflagset(6)) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
# NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example,
# re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as
# NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies
t_on_reply("1");
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably
# even for UDP2TCP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
# !! Nathelper
onreply_route[1] {
# NATed transaction ?
if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") {
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
# otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not
# know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts)
} else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers